| Author |
BCA on the Fed Replies |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7642 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
BCA believes that deflationary headlines will continue to dominate in the next 12 to 24 months - and as a result, the Fed and other central banks will cut policy rates much further:
http://www.bankcreditanalyst.com/public/story.asp?pre=PRE-20081117.GIF
JP Morgan now going on the record asserting that the Fed will cut the Fed Funds rate all the way to zero, with a promise to hold it there for a sustained period of time in order to bring down Treasury yields in the three to five year timeframe. The market has been pricing in that scenario over the last couple of weeks:
http://www.ustreas.gov/offices/domestic-finance/debt-management/interest-rate/yield.shtml
It is now time for the Fed and the GSEs to ramp up their purchases of GSE mortgage-backed securities. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7642 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree - BCA is only considering consumers' balance sheets and credit spreads at "market prices," whatever that is.
My sense is that the Fed will cut by 25 bps at the December 16th meeting and then cut by 25 bps again at the January 28, 2009 meeting. At a Fed Funds rate of 0.50% to 0.75%, it becomes problematic for money market funds to cover their costs and still give a positive yield to their investors (especially those that cater to retail investors as the average retail money market fund has an expense ratio of 0.55%). At a FFR of below 0.50%, we could see widespread liquidation of money market funds as it is no longer profitable for institutions to manage them. Such a scenario is counter-productive as money market funds provide substantial liquidity to the commercial paper and the asset-backed markets.
Once the FFR falls to 0.50%, and assuming this (along with the recent recaps of the banking sector and potentially the insurance sector in the coming days) is not sufficient to turn around the credit/equity markets, I expect to see the Fed to operate in longer-maturities of the Treasury market:
http://www.federalreserve.gov/BOARDDOCS/SPEECHES/2002/20021121/default.htm
I also expect the GSEs to ramp up their purchases in the GSE mortgage-backed securities market and for a permanent increase in the agency conforming limit to $729,750 (now set to expire in December 2009). Finally, I am assuming that another round of "fiscal stimulus" is inevitable at this point.
From an international perspective (again, assuming the credit/equity markets do not turn around), I expect the Federal Reserve to create larger swap lines to Australia, New Zealand, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, the UK, Switzerland, the Euro Zone, and Canada:
http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20080924a.htm
We should also see larger swap lines to South Korea, Singapore, Mexico, and Brazil:
http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20081029b.htm
As India is now forced to cut rates, I also expect the Fed to create a swap line with the Reserve Bank of India should the Indian Rupee come under attack, as that is the one remaining 800-pound gorilla in the room (the Fed is going to ignore Russia).
If the swap lines aren't sufficient (which I seriously doubt), then the Fed will most probably intervene in the foreign debt market by purchasing the sovereign debt of other developed countries, as well as the sovereign debt of Korea, Mexico, Brazil, Singapore, and India. This will help bring down sovereign spreads all across the world (and importantly, the large EM markets) and flood the world with USD-denominated liquidity. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 7530 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wonder how they determine that the economy is "in far worse shape" than then? Corporates are much better...this far into it (long before December) cause, ironically, they had credit. That leaves the consumer.... but now, we have an "energy policy" --and, for all the inadequacies, we have a world consumer.
And then there was the "new world order." 1 percent FF is a milestone for sure. No doubt most of the Fed did not want the Greenspan echo. Savings culture is not antithetical to spending culture. _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7642 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BCA asserts that the Fed may have to resort to "Quantitative Easing" later next year:
http://www.bankcreditanalyst.com/public/story.asp?pre=PRE-20081030.GIF
| Quote: | | The fed funds rate may well hit zero in the next six months given the profound weakening in the economic outlook. Eventually, the Fed might be forced to print money. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7642 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.bankcreditanalyst.com/public/story.asp?pre=PRE-20080130.GIF
| Quote: | | Critically, the FOMC statement retained the open-ended commitment to provide more interest rate relief if necessary, which will reassure jittery investors. Fed Governor Mishkin highlighted again recently the importance of easing early and aggressively in the face of a major negative shock, such as a housing recession. The market is currently discounting a slightly negative real fed funds rate in one year (i.e. 2% nominal rate less underlying inflation of slightly more than 2%), which is not overly aggressive in our view given the economic and financial risks. The speed of rate cuts will depend crucially on payrolls and the evolution of credit market tensions. Another jump in the unemployment rate and/or a spreading of credit market dislocation would spark further aggressive Fed action. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 7530 Location: Sunny California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7642 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Hard to say what the "hawks" will do. They can sound as hawkish as they want - as long as we are under normal market conditions. In times of crisis, Bernanke will rein them in and be the sole voice of the Fed - which I believe he will do tomorrow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 7530 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, I was more interested in people's impressions of FED actions. I suspect whatever they do, as long as they do something will be taken positively within a week or so. Probably more important for the markets to see some follow-on by BOE and ECB statements (perfect opportunity for Sarkosy and Merkel to intercede with the Unions).
I would say there's a more hawkish tone with the rotation. The two Democrat (?) unfilled posts may tilt this back. If we skirt the Recession look for them to tighten things up in a hurry. Better than to play the (rate) of ease would be to sell the Dec. 08 eurodollar (you already have the natural advantage of the inverse curve).
There is a risk 50bpts will be taken as a sign of weakness (thus co-ordination). From the Broker:
| Quote: | | Debt prices will be a function of the Fed’s decision. The [bond]market remains vulnerable to a sell off if the Fed is aggressive. Additionally, as the plans for the monolines and the fiscal stimulus materialize and signs of economic recovery start to appear, debt futures will be pressured. The risk to this outlook is that the market interprets the Fed’s aggressiveness as their recognition of economic distress and a poor non-farms. Look out for a rebound after a sell-the-fact due to this interpretation. An ease less that 50bps will be bullish for fixed income futures as the market will be exceedingly disappointed. Major flattening risks also exist in the presence of a gradual ease. Flattening will present an opportunity to reenter the curve steepener. There is support in the 2/10 steepener at 124bps. |
_________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7642 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I am still long - don't intend to change my positions before or after the meeting, just yet. Will revisit tomorrow evening. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
diesel Moderator


Joined: 05 Oct 2006 Posts: 409 Location: Australia & New Zealand
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I sold some of my SP500 Emini futures at the close today and rotated those profits into a short position on the Euro. Other than that I am long the dow, select tech stocks + Jap small caps. Should be interesting tommorow! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nodoodahs Moderator


Joined: 06 May 2005 Posts: 1863 Location: TX
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Haven't changed in a couple of weeks. Next revisit for the personal portfolio is 2nd W/E in Feb.
Long the BRI out of BRIC, Steel and Clean Energy, Euro and long Ts, Gold, Oil, and Soft Commods. Full house, 100%. _________________ He was wearing my Harvard tie. Can you believe it? My Harvard tie. Like oh, sure, HE went to Harvard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 7530 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Somehow I think they'll do what they've done before: they will make us feel it. Given they don't like intra-meeting cuts...which may be a reason not to. There are now four new voting members, with two dedicated hawks. Gold making all-time highs. Real Funds Rate out 2years is lower than it ever got in 0'1. And they will be better able to game the jobs numbers after. Bank index is over 90...maybe time to spring something innovative. Something with the SIV assets (a la the Russian central bank ) or RMBS CDOs. They could also go .50 at the Fiscal annnouncement.... But .50 does show they were'nt fooled by Jerome.
We owed' alot to BA and housing today. I'm staying short euro and aussie and trim my financials into the meeting--in other words, still long; hedging tomorrow.
Anybody else? _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7642 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
More easing still needed - and given the Fed's actions so far, the BCA doubts that it will disappoint:
http://www.bankcreditanalyst.com/public/story.asp?pre=PRE-20080129.GIF
| Quote: | | We doubt that the central bank will disappoint. Bernanke and the core decision-makers on the FOMC have clearly shifted into the “we’ll do whatever it takes” camp to prevent a further financial meltdown and a nasty recession. The decision between 25 or 50 basis points is a tough call but regardless, the statement will sound extremely dovish. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7642 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7642 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Please log in to view without the ad banners |
 |
|