 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Bill Miller |
dash Veteran Poster

Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 472
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:43 am Post subject: Bill Miller |
|
|
| Quote: | The situation today is more complicated. Stocks are cheap in relation to bonds, in my
opinion, and U.S. stocks, especially the U.S. mega-caps that were so expensive in 1999, appear
particularly attractive on a long-term basis. The popular winners of today remain, as they have
for several years: energy, materials, commodity-related companies, China, India, emerging
markets, and non-U.S. generally. In the first quarter, materials was the best sector, but anything
hard asset or infrastructure related did pretty well.
We benefited particularly fromour large holdings in steel stocks, which rose over 30% in the
quarter. Our also large homebuilder position, on the other hand, declined by about the same
percentage. You may be surprised (but you should not be) that we are more cautious near-term
on our steel position, but increasingly optimistic about the builders.
The news flow on steel is great, and will likely get even better in the second quarter, as
margins expand due to the pricing umbrella provided to the integrated companies such as
United States Steel Corp., by the increase in scrap prices and the resultant price increases
instituted by market leader Nucor.
The news flow on builders is terrible, what with the subprime collapse, foreclosures soaring,
home prices falling, and the companies mostly losing money.No housing bubble now! But the
builders trade around book value, and some, like our holdings Beazer Homes USA Inc. and
MeritageHomes Corp., well below book value. Buying builders around book value or below has
historically been a prescription for excess returns for anyone willing to look out a couple of
years. But whenever they reach book value, investors don’t want them because they are looking
out the next few months or so, and are fearful of what new bad news may occur.
In general, you should expect us to be selling what people like, and buying what they hate.
This is not done naively, it is just that mostly what people like is expensive, and what they don’t
like is cheap, and buying the cheap asset and selling the expensive one seems logical, except
when you actually do it.
One of the new things we have been doing, which may seem at odds with that, is some
private equity deals. We bought a position in a fund called AP Alternative Assets, a funding
vehicle created by Apollo, one of the largest and most accomplished private equity firms. Since
The Investment Commentary is not a part of the Quarterly Report to Shareholders.
the investment, Apollo has given us the opportunity to invest alongside them in some of their
deals. You will hear more about these investments in future letters.
iv Investment Commentary |
http://www.leggmason.com/funds/ourfunds/rts/Opportunity_Trust_3-31-07.pdf
There are also a lot of fantastic insights of a more general nature in the annual report. A must read:
http://www.leggmason.com/funds/ourfunds/rts/Value_Trust_3-31-07.pdf |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Author |
Bill Miller Replies |
nodoodahs Moderator

Joined: 06 May 2005 Posts: 2229
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Every time I think about yachts, I flash back to the Goldi Hawn movie "Overboard" where Edward Herrman is watching "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous" and drooling over the "top ten most luxurious yachts" _________________ I haven’t seen a beatin’ like that since somebody stuck a banana in my pants and turned a monkey loose. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Odysseus Senior Poster

Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Posts: 109 Location: Dallas/Moscow
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aha. Perhaps I have discovered the REAL reason for Bill Miller's implosion these last 4 years.
Sitting in the 'gentlemen's smoker' this morning I was thumbing through the latest issue of "International Yachts Magazine.' They obviously have me confused for someone who has money. Probably FIDO sold them my name.
Anyway, there are a lot of Feadship Yachts featured. As an aside, this issue bulks up at 349 pages. Reminded me of an old Sears Roebuck catalog. This mag may become one of my leading economic indicators Lot of yachts for sale
Looking at the history of Feadship, they provide a chronology of the yachts they have built and the owners.
Ole Bill took delivery of the 'UTOPIA', a 71.6 meter yacht direct from the Dutch shipyard in 2004!
Obviously the vessel was mis-named. It should have been called 'SISYPHUS!!!'
Regards, _________________ Psychic with Alzheimers. I can predict what I will forget. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 13138 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, talk about a "six-sgima" event! When sorrows come.....
But Miller's right: the powers that be are denying him mark to market--even if that's a grave marker. --And that is a lesson for all of us.
This is not a once-in-a-decade event. It will be a long time before we see 2005 again. _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rubedo Veteran Poster

Joined: 16 Sep 2007 Posts: 168
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2 more of Miller's holdings have imploded this week, Lehman and AIG. If you're keeping score, Miller also owned Countrywide, Bear Stearns, and Freddie Mac. Not once has he admitted he was wrong on any of these.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/investing/bal-bz.millerfreddie13sep13,0,2043495.story
Bill Miller, chairman of Legg Mason Capital Management, who bought more Freddie Mac shares this summer to become the company's largest shareholder, yesterday criticized the U.S. government's takeover of Freddie and Fannie Mae.
"Most troubling to the market is having private companies seized when they're in compliance with all published capital requirements," Miller said in a conference call yesterday with clients, Bloomberg News reported.
Legg declined to provide a transcript of the call because Miller's call was intended for clients only, according to a company spokeswoman, who confirmed the comments.
Miller's Baltimore-based subsidiary and its affiliate was the largest shareholder of Freddie Mac with a 12 percent stake as of July 31, according to regulatory filings.
Miller's biggest fund, the $9.14 billion Value Trust, held 17.7 million shares of Freddie Mac as of June 30, according to regulatory filings. He also bought 20 million shares for the $4.34 billion Opportunity Trust during July and August, according to regulatory filings. Both funds are down 31 percent this year, compared with the 14 percent drop for the S&P 500. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
diesel Moderator


Joined: 05 Oct 2006 Posts: 703 Location: Australia & New Zealand
|
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mtvk wrote: | As regard to Jeremy Grantham.
His projections are common sense based. His theory always been
"reversion to mean". He is saying now, in the next 7 years the
high quality blue chip US stocks will outperform all asset categories. |
His Malthusian views are one heck of a reversion to norm. Id take the techno optimist views over his any day. The trend is your friend. _________________ “I was once Snow White, but I drifted” – Mae West |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 13138 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Miller's biggest holdings in "safe" GSEs--he wanted to be long housing it would have been better to double-up on the dreaded homebuilders. So much is lost through "hedging" one's bets. That's a lesson for any market condition.  _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mtvk Veteran Poster

Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Posts: 242
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As regard to Jeremy Grantham:
He was extremely bullish on REITs and Emerging markets in 2002.
He is not a "perma bear" as told by the so called wall street liers.
His projections are common sense based. His theory always been
"reversion to mean". He is saying now, in the next 7 years the
high quality blue chip US stocks will outperform all asset categories.
Wall street pumpers who keep calling him as "perma bear"
like telling every one to keep buying all the time US equities.
They never ever mention about how diversified the portfolio has to be
so that you reduce risk from individual stocks, managers, asset class,
timing etc., at the same time have a good return with all the time
to spend in other things in life. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Odysseus Senior Poster

Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Posts: 109 Location: Dallas/Moscow
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I cannot link but there is an excellent discussion by Jim Grant in his August 8th issue that contrasts Bill Miller and Grantham.
The jist was that Miller is a really smart guy in Bull markets and Grantham is a really smart guy in all markets.
He chides Grantham for a speech he gave on CNBC in 1998 when he said he expected the S&P to return a negative 1.3% through 2008. The actual number is zero. Grantham was too negative! _________________ Psychic with Alzheimers. I can predict what I will forget. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 9723 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Massachusetts state pension fund dumps Miller and three other active managers in the domestic equity allocation. Also signals that they will ultimately shift all US equity strategies into pure indexing strategies:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aSr4yMDi4uBA&refer=home
| Quote: | | "We've determined that active managers add no value over long periods of time,'' Michael Travaglini, director of the Massachusetts Pension Reserve, said in an interview. |
I think what he meant was domestic long-only large cap equity strategies. If no manager can add value, then it doesn't make sense for them to shift their funds into hedge funds, where the fees (and thus the hurdles) are much, much higher. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 9723 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I doubt they will kick Bill Miller out of running Legg Mason Value Trust. Legg runs several other fund families, such as Royce, Western Asset, Brandywine, etc. Total assets under management are about $950 billion.
The Legg Mason brand name funds run about $100 billion (in mutual funds, separate accounts, commingled funds, etc) and Bill Miller is their biggest brand name by far (although one can probably count Rob Hagstrom as well). A recovery relative to the S&P 500 this year is probably off the table (it is now down about 35% YTD and trailing the S&P 500 by nearly 19%) but if Miller can put in a solid year in 2009, then they can probably start selling him again:
http://quicktake.morningstar.com/FundNet/TotalReturns.aspx?Country=USA&Symbol=LMNVX
It is all about gathering assets and I don't know if anyone else at Legg Mason can take on that role. The days of the "star manager" are definitely numbered. How many fund managers at Fidelity, American Funds, or Dodge & Cox can you name? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 13138 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
He put on the hedge-fund hat in Yahoo (after faling the same in CFC). If he could have pulled it off.... _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
diesel Moderator


Joined: 05 Oct 2006 Posts: 703 Location: Australia & New Zealand
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is Bill Miller Toast?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/04/AR2008070401108.html
| Quote: | Right and wrong times. Miller likes financial, technology and Internet stocks. And he typically holds some retail, media and health-care stocks, too. However, he hates most commodity businesses, including oil and copper. Those sector biases were perfect for the markets of the 1990s but have hurt results since oil prices started to spike three years ago. It makes sense that Miller did well in low-inflation environments and has fared poorly in today's world, with financial stocks in crisis and natural resources very precious.
|
_________________ “I was once Snow White, but I drifted” – Mae West |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 9723 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 9723 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Odysseus,
The fund's mantra has drifted between pure value or growth at a reasonable price.
Not quite sure I get your drift. The institutional world drives investment trends and fads but they are subjected to many self-imposed and obviously reaction constraints. In terms of the hedge fund, it is also driven by quarterly and annual performance numbers, and measurements on style drift. Short-term focus can be somewhat bad at mutual funds as well but nowhere near as bad.
best regards,
Henry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Odysseus Senior Poster

Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Posts: 109 Location: Dallas/Moscow
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Henry,
So institutional money is the dumb money? Not taking issue here. I just want to know who to bet against.
I've never followed Bill Miller so I don't want to step on anyone's toes but his top holdings are Amazon, Yahoo, Ebay, Sears and Fannie Mae? He is a value investor?
The poor guy probably learned to read a balance sheet at ITT Tech. Wait a minute, Fannie's balance sheet is at the Fed. That should make it as sound as the dollar.
Sorry. Just got back from the dentist! _________________ Psychic with Alzheimers. I can predict what I will forget. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Please log in to view without the ad banners |
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|