MarketThoughts.com Home Page
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  StatisticsStatistics   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

British Banking/Housing
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> The Europe Board
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author British Banking/Housing
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16929
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 10:20 am    Post subject: British Banking/Housing Reply with quote

From the broker:

Looking at the UK Housing Market
With the problems brewing in the UK banking system, some are questioning the stability of the British financial structure and furthermore the possibility of on going rate hikes. Going forward, the situation in the housing market will remain instrumental in determining future monetary policy.



UK home prices remain at their all time highs. According to the BBC, the average cost of a home is Stg.210,578, up 9.25% from last year. Furthermore, the Rightmove Asking Price index hit all time highs in August. Though these gains have been consistent, they have been decelerating. The Y/Y growth rate in the Nationwide House Prices index has fallen off its 2003 highs. The graph below exhibits the trend since 1992.

Nationwide House Prices: Monthly 1992-2007



While the index did pick up some steam at the end of 2006, there has been some recent consolidation around 9.5%. The pick-up in housing prices was a function of the growing business in innovative mortgage products. According to a Halifax press release distributed in 2001, “UK borrowers benefit from having a wide choice of mortgage products, including variable rate loans, discounted, fixed, tracker, capped, and 'cap and collar' mortgages. In contrast, over two thirds of mortgages in Europe are fixed rate loans.” It is estimated that from 2002-2005 over ¼ of the loans made were adjustable. Lower loan standards and a diverse array of mortgage products encouraged aggressive lending. Loans for house purchases increased to Stg. 9.192B in July of 2007 from Stg. 3.431B in January of 2000. The data on mortgage approvals also expresses how the changes in lending standards encouraged the boom in the real estate sector. Approvals surged from 1.7B in mid 2001 to 6B by December of 2006. The changing housing climate in the UK however has since depressed approvals to under $4B.
UK borrowers will soon face the consequences of these loose standards. By the end of the year, 800K mortgage will be subject to re-set to significantly higher rates. The fixed mortgage average has risen from 3.99% in 2003 to 5.71 by July of 2007. Going forward, the market is left to grapple with the UK’s ability to digest these higher rates. The higher mortgage rates and resets will create major financial obstacles in the UK. One of the main indications of the continued deteriorating housing market is the large value of home equity withdrawals. The chart below shows the relationship between the per quarter value of home equity withdrawals.





According to this chart home equity withdrawals have stayed robust. Though there was a precipitous decline in the metric from 2004-2005, the most recent spike could likely be due to the rebound in home prices. The increasing value of home equities withdrawals suggests that the consumer is becoming overleveraged. Considering the upward trend interest rates, credit for the individual may face unmanageable levels. The growth in income in relationship to HEW argues for a contraction in the UK economy. According to the Bank of England data used in the above graphic, yearly income growth is approaching negative levels. Notice on the graph that in the later portion of the data set declines in income growth correlate with expansions in home equity withdrawals. This in mind, it is arguable that falling income levels forced consumers to borrow on their homes to fund purchases. Looking back to home prices, low income growth coupled with high mortgage rates suggests and affordability problem in addition to an over-leveraged housing market.
These statements in mind, it is unlikely that the BOE will hike at their next meeting. Though money supply growth and inflation do argue for the continuation of the tightening cycle, the BOE will recognize the deflationary pressures and economic stresses extending from the housing market.[/code]
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> The Europe Board
Author British Banking/Housing Replies
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16929
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FSA liquidity standards:

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Policy/Policy/2009/09_16.shtml

Wherein we find that incipient notion from the market itself that it is its own worst enemy:

Quote:
8.14 In CP08/22 we proposed that firms should be required to turn over their liquidity buffers regularly in private markets. By this we meant that firms would regularly need to generate liquidity from their liquidity buffers through sale or repo.We received few comments on this proposal, but the feedback received was not supportive of the approach. For example, one respondent said:

Testing the market … may be dangerous, sending the wrong signal to other market participants. … [F]irms who are seldom active in markets should only be required to research market prices periodically rather than actually executing trades.

8.15 We believe that the respondent’s concern over the existence of a turnover requirement justifies the need for such a provision. If generating liquidity from a firm’s buffer gives negative signals about its financial health it cannot serve the purpose for which it is designed. If a firm regularly and randomly turns over its liquid asset buffer the signalling effect will be reduced, as the markets will not be able to link the act of accessing the repo markets with signs of stress. We will continue with this approach.

_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11723
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

UK housing prices rose for a second straight month, but by less than expected:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&sid=aMsgy3Wn6vJ0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16929
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

HSBC's "headline" 1.99% mortage with 40% down:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1242039208&play=1
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16929
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The "v" in london property:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aKkxmq34nT3E
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16929
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 7:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The RBS shadow over Lloyds attempt to "seize the day" with yet another rights offering....but this time to get out of the govt's hair. A bridge too far?

http://tinyurl.com/mcsx5q
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16929
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Bank of England's Royal Bank of Scotland shuffle: no good times for two years.

http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/RBS/638965803x0x311888/6ee47880-aa6d-4b61-aea5-26a4c3240a6e/070809_1.pdf


From UBS:

RBS H1 underlying loss of £3.4bn versus UBS expectation of £2.5bn
Before the gain of £3.8bn on repurchased debt, RBS generated a loss before tax of
some £3.4bn. The group has reorganised itself into core and non-core divisions
with the former generating a profit of £6.2bn with the latter realising a loss of
£9.7bn. GBM was the main driver of both, generating £4.9bn of PBT within the
core division but also negative revenues of £4.2bn and a significant share of total
impairment charges of £5.3bn in non-core.
Disclosure excellent and clear targets too
RBS has provided comprehensive disclosure on core and non-core divisions both
in terms of income and key exposures. There is significant overlap between the
non-core division and the APS assets with the company indicating that 40% of
non-core assets and 56% of non-core risk assets will be covered by the APS.
Targets have been provided back towards profitability and normalised earnings
which are framed in terms of 2013 delivery.
BE:
Margins and credit challenges
Margins declined to 1.65% in Q2 from 1.78% in Q1 and 2.07% for 2008. We
expect the rate of attrition to decline from here. Overall impairment charges were
£7.5bn of which c.70% relate to charges in respect of assets in the APS.
Valuation
We will review our estimates and price target following the analyst meeting later
today but would not be surprised to see the stock to retrench after its recent run.
We see trough tangible book value at 43p by end 2011. Our 40p price target is this
trough value discounted back a year.


Other than RIO, which did not get done, this may have been "Last Great Deal"

Quote:
Acquisition of ABN AMRO
On 17 October 2007, RFS Holdings B.V. ('RFS Holdings'), a company jointly owned by The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (‘RBS’), Fortis Bank Nederland (Holding) N.V. ('Fortis') and Banco Santander S.A. ('Santander') (together, the 'Consortium Members'), completed the acquisition of ABN AMRO Holding N.V. ('ABN AMRO').
RFS Holdings is implementing an orderly separation of the business units of ABN AMRO with RBS retaining the following ABN AMRO business units:
• Continuing businesses of Business Unit North America;
• Business Unit Global Clients and wholesale clients in the Netherlands
(including former Dutch wholesale clients) and Latin America (excluding Brazil);
• Business Unit Asia (excluding Saudi Hollandi); and
• Business Unit Europe (excluding Antonveneta).
Certain other assets will continue to be shared by the Consortium Members.
On 3 October 2008, the State of the Netherlands acquired Fortis Bank Nederland (Holding) N.V. including Fortis' participation in RFS Holdings that represents the acquired activities of ABN AMRO.
The separation of platforms shared between RBS and its Dutch state-owned partner has been completed and the Group is now on track, subject to legal process and regulatory approvals, for the legal separation of the constituent parts of ABN AMRO by the end of the year. From that point RBS will cease to consolidate the Dutch state's interest in RBS Group statutory accounts.
Pro forma results
Pro forma results have been prepared that include only those business units of ABN AMRO that will be retained by RBS. The financial review and divisional performance and discussion of risk and capital management in this Company Announcement focus on the pro forma results. The basis of preparation of the pro forma results is detailed on page 72.
Statutory results
RFS Holdings is jointly owned by the Consortium Members. It is controlled by RBS and is therefore fully consolidated in its statutory financial statements. The interests of the State of the Netherlands and Santander in RFS Holdings are included in minority interests.

_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16929
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 7:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thinking the unthinkable, LLoyds standing on its own feet:

http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2009/08/06/65671/lloyds-out-of-the-frying-pan-and-out-of-the-aps/
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16929
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"What if" housing has bottomed translated into Lloyds, courtesy, casanove (from alphaville):

Our estimates are based on falling house prices this year and next. Yet halfway through the year, house price indices are slightly higher. If the low point in house prices has passed it would reduce our estimates for risk assets and, more importantly, for mortgage loan impairment. Cumulatively over three years to 2011E, the lower loss given default would add £3bn to pre tax profits and some 7p to book value by December 2011E. Arguably conditions that are consistent with stable house prices would result in a lower default rate across retail loan books giving a further benefit to earnings, capital and book value.
Our view remains that house prices will decline but near term news flow may support a more optimistic outlook, of which, on our estimates, Lloyds is the major beneficiary in the sector. If the share price rises we would regard it as an opportunity to sell the shares.
NH:
Furthermore, a scenario in which house prices stabilise would suggest a more benign economic picture; for example unemployment might not rise through 2010E as we assume. Therefore under the scenario of stable house prices, the likelihood is that the probability of default would be lower also across the loan books, particularly retail, than we have in our estimates. We have a further £10bn of impairment arising over the three years to 2011E from retail unsecured loans.
NH:
We leave our estimates unchanged. Mortgage supply will remain constrained as the banking system reduces its reliance on wholesale funding, while the prospect of a rising tax take to service government borrowing adds further pressure to the outlook for arrears from a consumer sector with record levels of debt.

_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16929
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Goldman on British Banks:

Structural changes positive for LT returns
The UK banking sector is going through
unprecedented change. The market appears to
view these changes as unambiguously negative
given that the UK banks currently trade at less
than 1x tangible book versus historical averages
of above 3x. Our view is more constructive: we
see a strong relationship between market share
concentration and long-term returns, and expect
some of the reduced ROE following de-leveraging
to be offset over time through higher ROA.
NH:
Credit costs key driver of ROE; risk
transformation through GAPS
The key driver of valuation is ROE, and the key
cyclical driver of ROE is cost of credit. We have
taken a closer look at the credit risk remaining on
the banks’ balance sheets after taking the
Government’s Asset Protection Scheme (GAPS)
into account. We conclude that Lloyds is likely to
have below-sector-average credit losses by 2011,
and that normalized medium-term losses will be
below 0.5% of loans, suggesting an ROE of 20%+
after 2011.
NH:
Asset/liability repricing; pain now, gain later
We have attempted to model the repricing of
assets and liabilities for the three domestic UK
banks. We expect Lloyds’ and RBS’s net interest
income to decline by an average 12% in 2009 and
4%-6% in 2010, and to turn positive in 2011.
NH:
Lloyds onto Conviction Buy (from Neutral)
Lloyds is trading at 0.8x our estimated trough
reported tangible book value of 87p, vs. a 2011E
ROTE of 16%, making it the least expensive large
cap bank in Europe. This is despite our view that:
(1) it has the highest credit buffers in relation to
vulnerable assets in Europe thanks to GAPS; (2) it
will report above-average ROTE by 2011; and (3)
its market share – the highest of any bank in the
G7 – should allow its returns to recover to sectorleading
levels over the long term. We upgrade
Lloyds to Buy and add it to our Conviction List
and UK Relative Value List.

Reinstating on Barclays as Neutral
We have removed the Not Rated designation from
Barclays and have a Neutral rating on the shares.

Implications
In our view, Barclays is well positioned to navigate through the headwinds that UK banks are currently facing. We regard Barclays’ capital levels as sufficient and, importantly, we expect the bank to remain profitable throughout this economic downturn. We also believe that its efforts to remain independent of government ownership give it increased freedom to act fully commercially.
NH:
Looking ahead, we expect the integration of the Lehman Brothers US operations and the related ambitious target of building Barclays Capital into a world-leading investment bank to be the key focus for Barclays. We estimate that this will contribute 43% of group gross operating profits from 2009 through to 2011. At the recent Barclays Capital investor day, management identified £5 bn of potential incremental revenue streams that could be achieved over the coming years through Lehman Brothers’ US operations alone.
NH:
While we are encouraged by the early signs of a successful integration, we remain concerned about near-term earnings dilution from the sale of Barclays Global Investors, as we expect this to reduce underlying ROE and
long-term growth. In addition, we believe Barclays is likely to return to normalized returns at a later stage in the cycle than its UK peers, as it has opted out of participating in the Government’s Asset Protection Scheme.

_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11723
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

UK financial firms projected to cut another 13,000 jobs in the 3rd quarter:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aBygw2Bz1wXY
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16929
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Luxury home prices in London rose in Q2 for the first time since September 2007. Prices were up 4.3% q/q, but down 11.5% y/y
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16929
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LLoyds selloff on placement not quite complete. (Yet another) Chance to buy one of the premiere banking institutions (and its indirect link to BOE) at 4X earnings. I think the idea that earnings streams will guide as insolvency issues quickly fade is right. I like selling puts to buy in.

Here's the DB positive outlook, again courtesy alphaville:

Quote:
Margin and loan losses, regulatory risk now; cheap earnings later
With bank solvency mostly dealt with, we believe the equity market will continue
to base bank valuations on post-crisis earnings. On this basis see LBG as cheap,
trading at 4.3x fully recovered EPS of 15.6p. Short term, there’s risk of
underperformance as significant weakness in interest margin and loan losses is
made obvious with 1H09 results on 5 Aug 09. However, not wanting to attempt to
finesse investment timing and miss the value opportunity, we upgrade to Buy
from Sell and increase our target price to 100p from 35p beforehand.
NH:
Expect weak trading in the short term
We expect LBG to post extremely weak 1H09 earnings driven by sharply lower
interest margins and elevated loan losses. Tangible NAV will fall materially from
124p as these losses, and those we forecast for 2009 and 2010 are reported.
Regulatory risk is substantial with the EU yet to sign off on government capital
injections and the APS, and likely in our view to impose behavioural limits and
potentially asset sales too. But, we believe the group is capable of 9p of postcrisis
earnings whilst interest rates remain low, rising to 15p as net interest
margins recover as loans reprice to wider spreads, deposit spreads improve and
wholesale repricing completes. This sees the bank currently trading at 4.3x
recovered earnings and 0.6x our trough TNAV estimate – attractive, short term
risks notwithstanding, in our view.
NH:
Valuation – Better the further out we look
We value LBG on the basis of our estimate of post-crisis earnings for the group,
having previously valued the business on a discount to underlying tangible NAV
basis on fears over the solvency of the bank. Given rebuilt capital ratios and
government reinsurance of a substantial portion of the loan book we believe an
earnings-based approach is warranted. Our 100p target price is based on a fair
multiple of 6.5x fully recovered EPS of 16p. This target price is broadly in line with
our estimate of trough stated tangible NAV per share. See page 9 for detail.
NH:
Risks – Plenty in the short term
Key downside risks relate to regulatory rulings (lack of APS approval or forced sale
of substantial portion of earnings base to qualify for EU approval), margin decline
(low interest rates plus cost of renewing and extending wholesale funding duration
amount to £2-3bn p.a.) and loan impairments (we forecast £19bn of loan losses in
2009, 4.3x normalised level). We expect short term trading will be weaker than the
market expects which may weaken confidence in the post-crisis earnings power.

_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!


Last edited by rffrydr on Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:23 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16929
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2009 10:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Credit Suisse Outlook gives little benefit to the economy:

Quote:

Impairment and investment banking were certainly interesting elements of last
week.s IMS statements, but for us margins stole the show. In our research
Funding, liquidity and Government guarantees, 7th April 2009, we discussed the
likely medium term pressure on margins through lower rates and new liquidity
regulations but the Q1 numbers highlighted just how current this issue is.
In that research we concluded that liquidity proposals and other regulatory
changes could significantly hold back ROE and we stand by this view. Indeed,
using history as a guide, we think sustainable returns could hover around COE.
In the old days, when wholesale was less prevalent and more assets were tied
up in Government bonds, loan to deposit ratios were much lower and ROE
around 10% was common place. Long-run data from the FDIC highlights this
well, but we also look at Lloyds (as our UK example) in this research. Here we
believe average ROTE was sub 10% in every decade between 1920 and 1980.
PM:
The recent rally is understandable but with the sector on 1.5 times PV 2011E
TNAV, we think 15% ROTE is now priced in. Not only does history advise us to
be cautious, but this would require banks to earn the same profit as in 2007,
adjusting for .normalised. impairment. We are not comfortable with this given
liquidity costs and the likely de-leveraging of the system. We believe the most
structurally challenged bank is LBG (Underperform) and our target price is 65p
(from 45p). Our RBS target price is 30p (from 25p) and so we downgrade to
Underperform. Our favourite bank remains Barclays although with a new target
price of 285p (from 170p) we see limited upside and downgrade to Neutral.
PM:
and here’s a little bit more on the liquidity buffer
PM:
Ourselves, we see two principal strands to new liquidity requirements.
1. FSA stress tests will determine the stock of Government securities to be held by
banks as a liquidity buffer. The stickier the funding base, the smaller the buffer. Over
time, the ratio of Government bonds to total assets has fallen markedly and is now
likely to rise. This creates a negative carry versus associated funding;
PM:
2. Lord Turner suggested the introduction of minimum .core funding ratios., like capital ratios but setting a minimum amount of deposits and very long term wholesale funding which banks should hold. This will force banks to boost deposit bases and sharply extend the duration of wholesale funding.
PM:
The starting base for UK domestic banks is not good, in our view.

1. We believe the sector (Barclays, LBG and RBS) holds around £150bn of high quality Government bonds representing a historically low 5% of the asset base. Another
£150-250bn of bond holdings is not out of the question, in our view;

2. The sector.s loan to deposit ratio is 150%. Another £650bn of deposits would be
required to bring this to 100%, i.e. full self-funding;

3. There is another £600bn of wholesale funding covering non-loan portfolio assets;

4. Around £700bn of the total £1.2trn of wholesale funding is < 3 month maturity and we suspect at least half of this is < 1 month;
PM:
Asset duration at the UK banks has extended and today over 60% of UK lending is mortgages with typical average maturity over 15 years. At a product level, the
redemption rate is higher but from a system level it is the length of time the mortgage
stays in the system that should determine liquidity requirements.
We therefore believe there is a very difficult transition period ahead for UK banks and
hence a period of potentially intense liability margin pressure. Assessing the precise impact of this is impossible as we don.t know exactly what the regulator wants, or how much appetite . and at what cost . there will be for long-term wholesale funds.


Alphaville May 12
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11723
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 10:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Housing in the UK starts to stabilize:

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/05/11/business/business-uk-britain-rics.html?_r=1
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16929
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

All the rest seems so civilized:

http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=BARC.L#chart1:symbol=barc.l;range=6m;compare=mt;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=on;source=undefined
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Please log in to view without the ad banners
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> The Europe Board All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 3 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB