Business Week on INTC vs. AMD

[HenryTo]

Let's see if Intel can pull another rabbit out of the hat:

http://yahoo.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_48/b3910050_mz011.htm

Historically, Intel has nearly always been able to deliver when they're backed into a corner - but whatever the case may be, this intense competition between Intel and AMD can only be good for businesses and consumers (unless you were an Intel investor, of course).

[HenryTo]

Intel trying to put the final nail into the coffin for AMD here - as it readies price cuts on its quad core server and desktop parts set for July:

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=7293

[HenryTo]

A review - for the most, just a tiny evolutionary step. No need to upgrade, unless the "Turbo Memory" component performs better-than-expected going forward.

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=2985&p=9

[HenryTo]

A new generation of Intel laptops is being officially launched today:

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=7220

[sonoop]

as far as i'm concerned, AMD is toast. INTC would give up.

[diesel]

Its always refreshing to read Ed Stroligo's comments on these sorts of things.

Source: http://www.overclockers.com/tips01144/

"ATI said in front of 150+ journalists that the R600XT won't be able to compete with the Geforce 8800 GTX. The dream is dead and Radeon HD 2900 XT won't be able to catch up with the six month old Geforce 8800 GTX.

"ATI said that R600XT, Radeon HD 2900XT has about the same performance as the 8800 GTS. Radeon HD 2900 XTX won't be launched in mid may and will be delayed to Q3 2007."

You fly 150 press people to Tunisia to say that?

And yes, they're not going to be on time, either.

AMD paid over five billion dollars for this?

And not a word about Barcelona.

In contrast, we see this about Intel.

"However, industry sources recently told TG Daily that a whole bunch of non disclosure agreements (NDAs) for the pre-release and distribution of 45 nm processors are already in place and carry a July 15 expiration date. “Pre-release”, of course, does not mean that Intel will launch the processor at this time; however, we received confirmation from our sources that initial sample shipments of Penryn are scheduled to begin late in Q2 and early Q3. We also expect the NDAs also to apply to the press, which means that first real-world Penryn benchmarks are likely to be published on July 15."

I don't think this means you're going to be to buy a Penryn July 16, but you'll probably know all about them July 16, just in time for people to decide between them and the K10s. If that's too long a wait, take a look at XTremesystems.org occasionally, starting maybe a month from now.

Now AMD could have beaten Intel to the punch by months by making some K10 machines freely available to those temporary Tunisians, and give them something better to write than "Our video cards are going to suck."

And if they did that, the financial people, God forbid, might actually like that, and maybe be more willing to buy your $2 billion issue, and maybe think twice about downgrading your debt from junk to "this may turn into trash."

And maybe it's just echoes of Good Friday in my head, but when I read that AMD planned to webcast its annual shareholder meeting, my first thought was cries of "Crucify, crucify" from the crowd.

OK, "Crucify" isn't going to happen, and I'm not recommending it, but imagine somebody yelling, "Bulldung" during the meeting, and someone recording it. That ought to be popular on YouTube.

There is no, repeat, no legitimate business reason for AMD to withhold this kind of information if they have the real deal. This has nothing to do with satisfying geek curiosity; it has everything to do with the financial health of the company.

No adequately aware (and relatively sane) person can draw any other conclusion from AMD's actions up to this point than to conclude that, for whatever reason, clock speeds, bugs, yields, other problems with process technology or design or something, K10s aren't the real deal at the moment.

Because if that isn't the case, if AMD does have the goods ready, doing what they've been doing would be so insane that every major exec should be sued and fired.

[HenryTo]

Another disappointment for AMD - this time on the graphics side:

http://www.dailytech.com/ATI+Radeon+HD+2900+XTX+Doomed+from+the+Start/article7052.htm

[HenryTo]

The onslaught from Intel continues, as they cut prices yet again:

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=7006

[HenryTo]

A good summary of AMD's latest earnings conference call:

http://www.betanews.com/article/AMD_to_Restructure_May_Outsource_More_to_IBM_Chartered/1177035785

[rffrydr]

Cutthroat defense:

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/intel-amd-reports-show-direction/story.aspx?guid=%7B0EF1DCF6%2D765C%2D4AD0%2DA020%2D1F5505BA6E29%7D
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!

[HenryTo]

A speed bump in the INTC desktop lineup and a good benchmarking study on INTC and AMD's current desktop processors:

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=2963

[HenryTo]

Dramatic drops on both AMD and INTC desktop processors later this month.

http://www.crn.com.au/story.aspx?CIID=76969&src=site-marq

Notebook cuts aren't in the pipeline yet, however. Given recent pricing patterns, my guess is that notebook processor price cuts probably won't happen until July at the earliest.

[HenryTo]

Intel reveals more details of its upcoming processors:

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=2955

[HenryTo]

CPU roadmap of both INTC and AMD on cnet.com:

http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-3086_7-6715793-1.html?tag=prmo1

[HenryTo]

More Intel price cuts on the way on their desktop processors. Same with Xeon as well - although that isn't mentioned in this article:

http://www.dailytech.com/Aggressive+Intel+Quadcore+Price+Cuts+Before+Barcelona/article6488.htm

And here is some benchmark information. This is the most recent I can find. Please see successive pages for more benchmarks:

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=2866&p=10

[HenryTo]

I need to go back to refresh my memory on the benchmarks... will report back later this week.

Best regards,

Henry