MarketThoughts.com Home Page
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  StatisticsStatistics   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CAPITAL vs LABOR
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 6351
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 6:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

East and West, "being rich has never been so expensive":

http://investorsinsight.com/otb.aspx
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 6876
Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Now, it is Harley's turn. In our CFA LA Annual Forecast Dinner, Paul McCulley made an interesting point last night. That is, the growth of real wages have more or less tracked the growth of productivity over time. Over the last five years, however, real wage growth has lagged, and while he still thinks corporate profit margins will be relatively high going forward, he also believes that real wages will do some catching up over the next few years.

We're not talking about raising the minimum wage (this will do nothing to reduce poverty and will actually increase inflation, which will incidentally hurt the middle class). We're talking about anyone that is within the lower to upper middle class.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Union Strikes Harley-Davidson Pa. Plant
Friday February 2, 10:21 am ET
By Martha Raffaele, Associated Press Writer
Union Strikes Harley-Davidson Plant in York, Pa.

YORK, Pa. (AP) -- Nearly 2,800 union workers walked off the job Friday at Harley-Davidson Inc.'s largest manufacturing plant, with small groups quietly picketing each entrance of the York facility.
The workers said they were prepared to stay on the picket lines for as long as it took to win a better contract than a company proposal they overwhelmingly rejected two days ago.

"There's no sense in doing this if we're not going to stick together," said Nevin Bechtel, 59, who works in the plant's painting department. "If we regress now, we've lost everything we're struggling for, and the company will think they've won."

More than 50 workers gathered as the strike began at midnight, said Tom Boger, a union representative for the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Local 175. Fifty members at a time were scheduled to picket throughout the day in three-hour shifts.

The company installed cement barricades to block access to all gates, even empty parking lots, Boger said.

The union voted Wednesday to authorize a strike after rejecting the company's contract offer, which would have reduced pay rates for new hires, required employees to pay part of their health insurance premiums and forced pension concessions.

In anticipation of the walkout, the company shut down production at the plant on Thursday.

"We are obviously disappointed by the union's decision," Fred Gates, general manager of Harley-Davidson's York operations, said Thursday. "The proposed contract was structured to help manage future costs that could be detrimental to our business over the long term."

But union members said they felt management's proposal would be a backward step.

"If they had kept the contract the way it is, everyone would have been fine with it," said Lucey Mrozinski, 43, a welding machine operator on the picket line.

Bechtel said the proposed two-tier wage system would hurt morale.

"We'll still keep building first-rate bikes, but when the second-rate people take over, what are we going to build then? Second-rate bikes," he said.

Russell Aldinger, 46, a mechanical assembler who said he had worked at the plant for 10 years, said he thought the company could afford to make a better offer.

"This company is very profitable, and for us to have to take concessions when we were earning the money that we were ... I feel it's ridiculous," he said.

The company said its proposal included annual wage increases of 4 percent over three years. But part of the increase depended on the union's agreeing to contribute toward health insurance coverage. Unionized employees currently pay no premium. It also would have doubled the company's 401(k) retirement plan contributions.

Boger said the union was prepared to return to negotiations.

"We'll wait for the company to call us," he said.

The facility employs more than 3,200 union and nonunion workers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 6351
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
"We'll still keep building first-rate bikes, but when the second-rate people take over, what are we going to build then? Second-rate bikes,"

_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 6351
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A little color-commentary in light of current events as only the Brits can provide:

“For the majority of homeowners, they are now ‘lobster potted' for the rest of their lives in the 21st Century's version of the Victorian treadmill. Welcome to modern debt-controlled serfdom, where if you lose your job, either through retrenchment or illness, you lose your home. It has become a veritable Sword of Damocles, or a stick with which to beat recalcitrant labor into a bloody pulp, should they ever prove restless or disobedient. The ruthless and faceless plutocrats who benefit vastly from this dreadful scheme must be laughing on their return to a status of demagogic power which is the modern equivalent of Roman or Medieval Aristocracy at its exploitative worst….

The mortgage weapon forms an integral part of the armory of the so-called New World Order (NWO) as it seeks to accumulate wealth and power to control people by stealth.”

--Economist Nigel Maund
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 6351
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

....And Old School in the Here and Now:

http://www.mineweb.net/whats_new/621638.htm

This in the context of commodity boom.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 6351
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's all here in the microcosm of one biography: the restrained pride felt by Mexico in their "Mr. Big" is giving way to disgruntlment that thier country has become a factory town.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-slim9mar09,1,3488330.story

Moral: the "global" perspective still predominates. Reaction in the air. The fight, if it comes, will be over the telephone.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 6351
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 7:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kerkorian offer put Labor front and center...on the chopping block.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aXNxmo65UTO4

PE confronting the legacy costs in Autos will set stage for another wave of equity takevoers if sucessful--or become a political spark a la TXU and turn the tide back. At 89 years old this'll be quite a swan song.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 6876
Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

At the same time, the high-tech industry is running short of qualified workers:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
India High-Tech Industry Out of Workers
Saturday April 7, 12:13 am ET
By Tim Sullivan, Associated Press Writer
The Trouble With Success: India's High-Tech World Searches Frantically for More Workers

MYSORE, India (AP) -- At the heart of the sprawling corporate campus, in a hilltop building overlooking the immaculately shorn lawns, the sports fields and the hypermodern theater complex, young engineers crowd into a classroom. They are India's best and brightest, with stellar grades that launched them into a high-tech industry growing at more than 25 percent annually. And their topic of the day? Basic telephone skills.

"Hello?" one young man says nervously, holding his hand to his ear like a phone. "Hello? I'd like to leave a message for Number 17. Can I do that?"

Nearly two decades into India's phenomenal growth as an international center for high technology, the industry has a problem: It's running out of workers.

There may be a lot of potential -- Indian schools churn out 400,000 new engineers, the core of the high-tech industry, every year -- but as few as 100,000 are actually ready to join the job world, experts say.

Instead, graduates are leaving universities that are mired in theory classes, and sometimes so poorly funded they don't have computer labs. Even students from the best colleges can be dulled by cram schools and left without the most basic communication skills, according to industry leaders.

So the country's voracious high-tech companies, desperate for ever-increasing numbers of staffers to fill their ranks, have to go hunting.

"The problem is not a shortage of people," said Mohandas Pai, human resources chief for Infosys Technologies, the software giant that built and runs the Mysore campus for its new employees. "It's a shortage of trained people."

From the outside, this nation of 1.03 billion, with its immense English-speaking population, may appear to have a bottomless supply of cheap workers with enough education to claim more outsourced Western jobs.

But things look far different in India, where technology companies are spending hundreds of millions of dollars in a frantic attempt to ensure their profit-making machine keeps producing.

"This is really the Achilles heel of the industry," said James Friedman, an analyst with Susquehanna Financial Group, an investment firm based in Bala Cynwyd, Pa., who has studied the issue.

"When we first started covering the industry, in 2000, there were maybe 50,000 jobs and 500,000 applicants," he said. Now there are perhaps 180,000 annual openings, but only between 100,000 and 200,000 qualified candidates.

For now, industry is keeping up, but only barely. A powerful trade group, the National Association of Software Services Companies, or NASSCOM, estimates a potential shortfall of 500,000 technology professionals by 2010.

On the most basic level, it's a problem of success. The high-tech industry is expanding so fast that the population can't keep up with the demand for high-end workers.

Tata Consultancy Services, for instance, India's largest software company, hires around 3,000 people a month. The consulting firm Accenture plans to hire 8,000 in the next six months and IBM says it will bring on more than 50,000 additional people in India by 2010.

A shortage means something feared here: higher wages.

Much of India's success rests on the fact that its legions of software programmers work for far less than those in the West -- often for one-fourth the salary. If industry can't find enough workers to keep wages low, the companies that look to India for things like software development will turn to competitors, from Poland to the Philippines, and the entire industry could stumble.

The responses range from private "finishing schools" polishing the computer skills of new graduates to multimillion-dollar partnerships spanning business, government and higher education. The biggest companies have built elaborate training centers. The Mysore campus, for instance, was little more than scrub-filled fields when Infosys, India's second-largest software firm, based in the nearby technology hub of Bangalore, began building here in earnest three years ago.

In America, the campus would be nothing unusual. But in India -- with its electricity outages, poverty and mountains of garbage -- the walled-in corporate fantasyland, watched over by armed guards, is anything but normal.

It has 120 faculty members, more than 80 buildings, 2,350 hostel rooms and a 500,000-square-foot education complex. There's a movie complex built inside a geodesic dome. An army of workers sweeps the already-spotless streets and trims the already-perfect lawns.

Month by month, it's getting bigger. Today, some 4,500 students at a time attend the 16-week course for new employees. By September, there will be space for 13,000.

Infosys spent $350 million on the campus, and will spend $140 million this year on training, said Pai, the human resources chief.

"This is the enormous cost we have to pay to ensure we have enough people," he said.

They're not the only ones.

IBM's technical skills programs reached well over 100,000 Indians last year, from children to university professors. At Tata Consultancy Services, measures range from a talent search as far afield as Uruguay to having executives teach university classes -- all designed simply to make people employable.

Most industry leaders believe these investments will pay off, and India will remain competitive. But most are also guarded in their optimism.

"We should be able to get through this year, but if we don't get things like finishing schools into place we'll see an actual shortage," said Kiran Karnik, the NASSCOM chairman.

Much of the problem is rooted in a deeply flawed school system.

As India's economy blossomed over 15 years, spawning a middle class desperate to push their children further up the economic ladder, the higher education system grew dramatically. The number of engineering colleges, for instance, has nearly tripled.

But the problems have simply grown worse.

India has technical institutes that seldom have electricity, and colleges with no computers. There are universities where professors seldom show up. Textbooks can be decades old.

Even at the best schools -- and the government-run Indian Institutes of Technology are among the world's most competitive, with top-level professors and elaborate facilities -- there are problems.

The brutal competition to get into these universities means ambitious students can spend a year or more in private cram schools, giving up everything to study full-time for the entrance exams.

Instruction is by rote learning, and only test scores count.

"Everything else is forgotten: the capacity to think, to write, to be logical, to get along with people," Pai said. The result is smart, well-educated people who can have trouble with such professional basics as working on a team or good phone manners.

"The focus," he said, "is cram, cram, cram, cram."

Things are different at the Infosys campus.

"The premier concern in college was to get maximum marks," said Sanjay Joshi, a 22-year-old engineer midway through Infosys' training course. "Here, the focus is totally on learning."

Much of that learning is technical, mostly focusing on programming. But "soft skills" classes, as they're called, also include such things as e-mail etiquette and problem-solving.

Then there are off-hours. The average age on campus is 22 and for some of them it's their first time away from home. There's a soccer field, a cricket field, a swimming pool with a juice bar, a bowling alley and a gym. There are racks of bicycles to ride.

You could drown in politeness. "Ride Carefully" a sign warns bicyclists at a gentle curve in the road; "Enjoy your visit," a passing student tells a visitor.

Everywhere, there are well-groomed, well-mannered young people.

On a recent morning, students filed into a large classroom for a programming course.

By 8:45 a.m. -- 15 minutes before class began -- the room was nearly full. Row after row of students sat quietly, waiting for the teacher.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 6351
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 7:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks like therre is another story here: not being able to utilize what India already has. Culture provides a background woven of interconnected links that business discounts. Like the computerized ID systems finding faces in the clouds Indian schools seemed to have missed the basics.


"Sociability:" Push any aspect of human development to the exclusion of others and oops.... you don't have "people;" therefore, employees anymore. Clearly it's not just a matter of being "nice." It a matter of working with other people.

Call it "inflation" but that these dramatically rising costs occur precisely in the area of abundance, labor in the case of India should not be surprising for those whom "nothing is obvious."
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 6351
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Airlines in the pink--almost.

They want 350 LAX to Chicago; 1250 to Frankfurt, clearly the capacity problem and economy are in sync. (overpaid) Labor's concessions made it happen and "get" squat:

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-airlines14apr14,1,5540724.story?ctrack=1&cset=true
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 6351
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 7:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
"Your Mercedes wasn't enough, you brats. Your golden necklaces weren't enough you snobs. Your trust funds wasn't enough. Your vodka and cognac wasn't enough. All your debaucheries weren't enough. Those weren't enough to fulfill your hedonistic needs. You had everything.''


--Cho Seung-Hui
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 6351
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2007 4:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Dialectic: Thesis X Antithesis = Synthesis


"If you're not in the game, you're really going to get really screwed," says Leo Gerard, president of the 850,000-member union, which represents workers in chemicals, paper, aluminum and several other industries in addition to steel.

Quote:
PITTSBURGH -- As Brazilian steel giant CSN maneuvered last year to merge with Wheeling-Pittsburgh Corp., the two companies paid little heed to opposition from the United Steelworkers union.

That was a mistake.

The USW wanted what it considered a more union-friendly bidder than CSN, and found one in Chicago upstart Esmark Inc. Executives of Esmark promised that if they got hold of Wheeling-Pitt, there would be no union layoffs there. The union threw its weight behind Esmark, which then mounted a fierce proxy fight to oust the Wheeling-Pitt board. In November, it won handily.

"We turned the entire board over in one day -- little old Steelworkers and little old Esmark," says Ron Bloom, the steel union's point man in the battle.

At a time when organized labor at times seems a feeble anachronism, the USW is exercising plenty of power, by playing for keeps with the capitalists. Its strategy, rather than simply to pound the table for higher pay or threaten strikes, is to block takeovers, take sides in bidding wars and fight for board seats.

The union also muscles its way to the negotiating table in bankruptcies, billing itself as a "creditor" whose claims are workers' lost wages and benefits. In its most sophisticated tactic, it cuts deals with private-equity players and other financiers. "If you're not in the game, you're really going to get really screwed," says Leo Gerard, president of the 850,000-member union, which represents workers in chemicals, paper, aluminum and several other industries in addition to steel.

Many labor chiefs remain hostile to Wall Street types sailing in to buy struggling companies. "We see them simply as a group of wealthy people that control a group of other wealthy people's money, and buy low, throw a lot of people out of work, and sell high," says Buzz Hargrove, president of the Canadian Auto Workers union.

Another reason other unions haven't adopted the USW strategy, some say, is that their industries didn't face the kind of crippling damage that pushed the steel union to try a new approach. But the USW's tactics may become more common as unions recognize they must deal with the Wall Street crowd, which as a result of investments now indirectly controls thousands of union jobs.

From his office in USW's Pittsburgh office tower, Mr. Bloom straddles the worlds of New York private money, corporate executive suites and Midwest union halls. In the Wheeling-Pitt case he dealt with entrepreneurs who run Esmark as well as with Franklin Mutual Advisers LLC, a big mutual-fund firm that owns 70% of Esmark's shares. In return for Esmark's no-layoff promise, the union agreed not to oppose its wish to import steel slabs to Wheeling-Pitt mills if Esmark manages to acquire the company, as it hopes to do this summer. The union customarily opposes such imports.

Both inside and outside the USW, Mr. Bloom is known as a financially savvy negotiator -- a 52-year-old with a tendency (like his boss) to spout profanities. Mr. Bloom attended Harvard Business School, where he gravitated to populist business cases and was keenly interested in employee buyouts. After 10 years at investment banks, among them Lazard, he became special assistant to the USW president in 1996.

Some USW members think Messrs. Bloom and Gerard are too cozy with the moneymen. Lee Siskie, a 64-year-old retiree who worked at an Ohio mill now operated by Republic Engineered Products Inc., says a 2002 deal between the USW and financiers kept the mill open, but his benefits were slashed during the bankruptcy proceedings. Mr. Siskie figures the union "should be working with people that know more about the steel business than the investment business," not people who "want to make a quick hit and get the hell out."

Mr. Bloom says that dealing with financial buyers of steel assets, people like New York's Wilbur Ross, "is just business." Indeed, he says, in contrast to traditional steel executives, who sometimes want unions "in their place," talking to private-equity types is refreshing: "They don't take cultural offense to anything. They just deal with power."

USW leaders first began to change their approach in the 1980s, when American steel was decimated by foreign competition, overcapacity and high costs. The many resulting bankruptcies cost tens of thousands of jobs. Instead of confronting management with traditional demands, the steel union decided its best hope for preserving jobs and benefits was to back good companies that could make money. It began trying to pick winners and losers, often diving into restructuring battles.

The reason the USW can sway such battles traces largely to contract provisions called successorship clauses. In the case of most unions, such clauses merely require the acquirer of a plant covered by a collective-bargaining agreement to adhere to it.

USW agreements often go further: Many state that a successor company and the union must agree on a new labor contract before a plant is sold. This provision, which the Steelworkers negotiated in most of their steel-industry contracts beginning in the mid-1980s, effectively gives the union an approval right on the sale of a steel plant.

For the USW, a watershed event came in 2001. Mr. Ross was poking around LTV Steel during its second trip to bankruptcy court, with its mills closed. Mr. Ross recalls telling the union there was value in LTV, but it would need wholesale restructuring, including a labor overhaul.

He discovered that Messrs. Bloom and Gerard were open to radical change. The union was willing to embrace a leaner operating structure, altered work rules and new rules on incentive bonuses if it got what it wanted from a new owner of LTV.

Mr. Ross agreed that if he acquired LTV and it became profitable as part of his International Steel Group, a portion of the profit would go into a trust for retired steelworkers' benefits. The USW has worked with a number of companies to set up such trusts, designed to restore part of the retiree benefits that bankruptcies sometimes wipe out.

The USW says it agreed with Mr. Ross that if he reopened the mills, they could operate with 30% fewer union jobs; it says management ranks were reduced by at least twice as much. Mr. Ross then obtained control of LTV and reopened the operations, and the work force ratified a new labor agreement.

"It was a pretty radical change in the way steel was made. Without those [changes], I would never have bought LTV," Mr. Ross says. Referring to the USW's Messrs. Bloom and Gerard, Mr. Ross says, "These guys are very straight shooters."

Also in 2001, Bethlehem Steel filed for bankruptcy reorganization -- again drawing Mr. Ross's attention. Mr. Bloom began negotiations with him a second time. "So now we say to Wilbur, 'OK, we'll support you. We'll shield you from all other bidders . . . so you can get it real cheap.'" In return, he asked that "real money" be put into the retiree-benefit trust. He says he told Mr. Ross: "You get to put LTV and Bethlehem together -- you've now just created by the stroke of a pen the largest steel company in America."

Mr. Ross acquired several more steel companies, eventually selling them for $4.5 billion (and a $300 million personal profit) to Mittal Steel Co., the giant London company founded by Indian-born billionaire Lakshmi Mittal. Remaining USW members benefited and so did retirees, as hundreds of millions of dollars poured into the benefits trust. Meanwhile, the American steel industry caught another break, as the global commodities boom has improved its fortunes in recent years.

The USW has sometimes given up its right to approve the sale of a steel company in exchange for benefits for its membership. The union struck such a deal with aluminum company Ormet Corp. last year after a rocky negotiation with a private-equity firm that controls Ormet. The deal brought the union members supplemental unemployment benefits and left the private-equity group, MatlinPatterson Global Advisors LLC, free to sell Ormet when it chooses to.

"Private-equity guys buy companies and sell them five to seven years later, and they need exit" strategies, says Mr. Bloom. "We get that."

Of the USW's dozens of negotiations in recent years, few show its power better than the struggle over Wheeling-Pittsburgh.

That company was long considered a weak player and candidate for a merger. In 2005, its board retained an investment bank and weighed possible partners, Esmark among them. It selected Brazil's CSN -- formally Companhia Siderurgica Nacional SA -- striking a partnership deal that left Wheeling-Pitt management in place. A former director of Wheeling-Pitt, Clark Ogle, says, "We felt it was prudent to have a partner. CSN seemed to be the most logical end."

The union didn't agree. Mr. Bloom says there was nothing "inherently wrong" with CSN, a strong, low-cost producer. But as he and Mr. Gerard analyzed the planned deal, they concluded that too much of its benefit would flow to CSN and not enough to American workers.

Mr. Bloom was rebuffed when he took his objections to Wheeling-Pitt management. In the middle of last year, the USW played its trump card. It invoked a successorship clause it had earlier negotiated with Wheeling-Pitt, an especially potent clause that covered the entire company and would be triggered in the event of any change of control. The union announced it would oppose Wheeling-Pitt's merger plan with CSN.

"What we're best at is stopping things," says Mr. Bloom.

The USW informed Wheeling-Pitt that it was throwing its support behind Esmark, a company Wheeling-Pitt had rebuffed.

Esmark was founded in 2003 by James and Craig Bouchard, brothers whose parents both worked in the industry. The brothers built Esmark by acquiring 10 steel-distribution businesses. They named it after a former Chicago consumer-products conglomerate they admired, with the approval of the executive who had built that business.

A merger with Wheeling-Pitt would create a company that combined steelmaking with distribution. "We liked the vision," says Mr. Bloom, who adds that Esmark had a reputation for good labor relations.

The USW leaders also were familiar with Esmark's financial backers -- principally Franklin Mutual Advisers -- because Franklin had backed Mr. Ross's steel deals. Franklin was prepared to finance a merger of Esmark and Wheeling-Pitt by putting up as much as $200 million. Michael Embler, chief investment officer at Franklin's Mutual Series Funds, says, "Instead of us versus them, the Steelworkers think, 'How do we make this industry competitive?'"

The USW and the Bouchards bargained over terms of the union's support for an Esmark run at Wheeling-Pitt. The Esmark executives agreed not to lay off union members but pressed, in return, for the right to import steel slabs from Ukraine. To Esmark and its financial backers, this was a way to keep the mill running full tilt and thus more productively. The sides eventually struck that deal.

Although the union was able to block CSN, an alternative deal for Wheeling-Pitt could be mounted only by a steel company such as Esmark with the money and energy to try to wrest control. In July 2006, Esmark decided to wage a proxy battle to oust the Wheeling-Pitt board that had rejected it. Lobbying shareholders, Esmark CEO James Bouchard told a wire-service interviewer that support for the existing Wheeling-Pitt board "is a vote to keep the failed management team in place and guarantees continued conflict with the USW." Mr. Ogle, the former Wheeling-Pitt board member, says Wheeling-Pitt's operations were improving and there was a "breath of fresh air and hope" at the company.

In the November shareholder vote, the Esmark side won about 69% backing for its slate of directors. That included the support of a retiree-benefits trust that held 15% of Wheeling-Pitt shares. The USW says that while it didn't control those votes, it had made its views widely known.

The Bouchards at Esmark then replaced Wheeling-Pitt's board with their own slate, including two USW representatives. This laid the groundwork for a proposed merger between Esmark and Wheeling-Pitt this summer.

Esmark was well aware that when the USW is opposed to a steel company's actions, it can make its views known through moves that get the attention of institutional investors, such as vitriolic news releases or hints of future strikes. "It is suicide to try to buy a steel company without the union support," says Mr. Bouchard.

It's a lesson CSN learned too late. "We didn't get in on the side of the union at the start, so they became our enemies," says a CSN executive, Luiz Ernesto Migliora, who was not involved in CSN's Wheeling-Pitt bid. He says the Brazilian company remains interested in buying American steel assets, but next time, "I would never try anything without going to the union first."

The union may soon play matchmaker again. Mittal intends to sell a big mill in Sparrows Point, Md., that could fetch $2 billion. At least five bidders are expected, among them both CSN and Esmark. Once again, the union says it has veto power over the sale because of a successorship clause in its labor contract.

"Is it fair to say that we open the game oriented toward Esmark? Yes, of course it is," says the USW's Mr. Bloom. But, he adds, "the door is not shut. It can't be shut. We have an obligation to these members."

_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 6351
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2007 7:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

AFL-CIO challenges Blackstone's IPO:

http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/05/16/why-blackstone-is-or-isnt-an-investment-company/
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 6351
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 3:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

They're talking the talk on CNBC:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=338862878&play=1
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 6351
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2007 10:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

An interesting expression of same:

Quote:
As the divorce rate plummets at the top of American society and rises at the bottom, the widening “marriage gap” is breeding inequality


As the divorce rate plummets at the top of American society and rises at the bottom, the widening “marriage gap” is breeding inequality
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Please log in to view without the ad banners
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


|Low Interest Credit Card|Web Design|Design Help - Print VS. Web|Payday Loans|Debt Relief Plan| Powered by phpBB