MarketThoughts.com Home Page
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  StatisticsStatistics   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Cramer's Got My Number
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Cramer's Got My Number
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16932
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:33 pm    Post subject: Cramer's Got My Number Reply with quote

Well here's the Madman once again: couldn't help reprint 'cause now he's talking to--at--me. Is this really the "secret consensus"?

Quote:
Sometimes it just hits you. You will be reading an article about some fund manager somewhere who sounds perfectly intelligent and you will spot it, the holy grail of the moment -- THE CONSENSUS. I won't mention the fellow's name -- it is unimportant -- because he's good at his job, but the thoughts he is currently expounding sound like many others I hear, to wit:

Oil prices will fall to $80 a barrel.
The dollar will rise when the Fed stops cutting rates.
GDP growth in China will slow.

First, let me just say that those events would be bullish for every domestic company in our universe, including the financials, and we would have a miracle bull market where less than 20% of the market -- ag/mineral/oil and gas/infra --collapses and fully 80% of the market can rally (I am including the health care stocks because, somehow, they have been seen to become hostage to the weak federal government, and in this scenario I don't see the federal government as worried about cutting back spending).

So, as someone who has to talk about stocks all of the time and has an innate bias -- because I am not a hedge fund operator -- for stocks to go higher, I want this scenario to play out.

But let's take a look at it, because it is what I think the vast majority secretly believes in, and when you get a week where oil falls hard (albeit from really high levels) and the dollar rallies it seems like everyone believes in it out loud and the consensus pops out of the closet.

First, oil. Once again the consensus REFUSES to take into account how little oil is being discovered and how much is being pumped. We just sent oil man xxx Cheney over to Saudi Arabia in an attempt, no doubt, to get them to pump more. Believe me, they want to pump more too. It doesn't matter. Iraq is supposedly more pacified, and while all we hear about is the inevitable stealing of all the money coming from the fields -- typical of the incompetence and corruption that is endlessly worth banking on -- they are pumping more than they have and it doesn't matter. No areas right now are out of commission because of natural disasters or terrorism. Still doesn't matter. The hedge funds have had to unwind their 30-to-1 leveraged hoarding of oil and it STILL doesn't matter.

So what if a few million more people carpool. So what if we keep taking our food supply and shoving it into our tank. It doesn't matter. Don't you think that Exxon (XOM - commentary - Cramer's Take), Chevron (CVX - commentary - Cramer's Take), Conoco (COP - commentary - Cramer's Take), BP (BP - commentary - Cramer's Take) and Royal Dutch (RDS.A - commentary - Cramer's Take) are pumping all they can, because no one believes oil is sustainable at these prices save perhaps Jim Mulva from Conoco?

That's why I think the $80 is a fantasy. It's just too bullish for everything but oil. You believe it? Go buy AMR (AMR - commentary - Cramer's Take). Your money.

Next, the dollar. I think the dollar will rise when the economy gets stronger, but I think the issue with the dollar is how many we print and how little we save and how little we tax and how much we spend both as people and as a nation. Look around at the countries with strong currencies and you will see good growth and self-control, which under this administration has become a joke. I know I can barely contain my contempt for their decision to debase the dollar. They figure no one goes away, I guess.

This is the inevitable result of a plan to dismantle the federal government by starving it: you can't dismantle it and you can't starve it, you just get someone else to pay for it and they are pretty fed up with paying, knowing that there's a lot more supply ahead. I think the dollar will rally when we get some self-control or when we are so cheap that the Europeans come and snatch up our assets with their euros and that -- something I have been completely wrong on because I guess I, too, have been too bullish on the dollar -- hasn't happened yet. Or, the dollar will rally when we get a new administration that isn't as contemptible around the world, and that is viewed as having some self-control. Oh, an aside ... boy, are we hated.

Finally, GDP growth in China. Here's one we have been hearing about for about 10 years. I think there will be a cyclicality to China's growth. The fact that more than half the people in the country have cell phones means, let's say, that there are fewer people who need cell phones than two years ago. That's the kind of undefeatable logic that always prevails.

I point out that what people are really implying is that China will have a bust to go with its boom, which presumes the kind of bust that happened even as this country expanded across the continent. Moments got out of control but it was a really bad bet to believe that there wasn't, at any one time, secular noninflationary growth in this country for more than 100 years. That feels like China to me.

So, while I am a guy who likes a consensus, I see all of the takeaways of this consensus -- short Schlumberger (SLB - commentary - Cramer's Take) and XOM, sell Deere (DE - commentary - Cramer's Take) and Chevron, Halliburton (HAL - commentary - Cramer's Take) and Fluor (FLR - commentary - Cramer's Take) and Bunge (BG - commentary - Cramer's Take) -- having some short-term power to them. I understand the propensity to roll back gold -- the logical extension of a strong dollar.

But I simply don't see the structural side of this bull case -- more oil supply, a better administration, the end of industrialization of China -- playing out in a way that you can do anything but make a trade on it.

The investment side of the anti-consensus just seems a better bet to me.

_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary
Author Cramer's Got My Number Replies
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11734
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

By the way, that study by Ritholtz is hardly scientific. If one truly wants to gauge newspaper headlines, then any study should be thorough and consistent, such as what BCA has done:

http://www.bankcreditanalyst.com/public/story.asp?pre=PRE-20080311.GIF

Newspaper headlines aside, there are many much more credible statistics showing that most are still bearish on the stock market, as I previously mentioned in my commentaries, such as:

* 10th consecutive month of domestic equity mutual fund outflows. The previous record was 8 consecutive months, right after the October 1987 crash.

* Historically low readings in the ISE Sentiment Index.

* Historically lows readings on the CBOE equity put/call ratio.

* Record amount (both absolutely and as a percentage of domestic equity market cap) of money market mutual funds, or "investable cash sitting on the sidelines."

* Significant amount of reallocation from domestic equities into international equities, fixed income, and alternative investments over the last few years by institutional investors, namely DB pension funds, endowments, and foundations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11734
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Using sentiment as an indicator is only a part of it. Like I mentioned, the mainstream media was still very bullish on the USD earlier this year - this was one reason why I decided not to go long the USD at that time.

If one believes that sentiment should not be used for the USD, then you can hardly use it for gold either. Incidentally, the HGNSI (I subscribe to this) also declined dramatically during the summer 2006 correction - topping out at 51.8% on May 12, 2006 (when gold closed at $725 an ounce), and then plunging to a mere 8.93% on May 18th, when gold closed at $693.50 an ounce. A day later, gold plunged to $651.50. The correction wouldn't end until June 20th, when gold closed at $567.00, and once the HGNSI hit 1.8%.

Sentiment is the most reliable at extemes - and with the HGNSI still at 11.5% as of tonight, I still wouldn't bet on gold at this point.


Last edited by HenryTo on Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:38 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Rubedo
Veteran Poster
Veteran Poster


Joined: 16 Sep 2007
Posts: 168

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Incidentally, it seems to me that contrarian investing doesn't work with the dollar.

BTW, according to Hulbert's latest article, it's consistent with thestreet.com's polls where everyone is jumping off the gold bandwagon.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/mark-hulbert-contrarians-continue-bullish/story.aspx?guid=%7B1987E425%2D4997%2D4A1D%2DBCB3%2D1A6D99E48255%7D&dist=hplatest

ANNANDALE, Va. (MarketWatch) -- The evidence continues to mount that gold's spectacular plunge in the past week was a mere correction in an ongoing bull market.
Chart of 38099902
Just take what happened on Tuesday, when gold bullion jumped by more than $16 an ounce. Far from becoming more bullish, the average gold-timing newsletter tracked by the Hulbert Financial Digest reacted by becoming markedly more bearish.
That's a very good sign, according to contrarian analysis, because it suggests that there is a substantial wall of worry out there for the bull market to climb.
Consider the latest readings of the Hulbert Gold Newsletter Sentiment Index (HGNSI), which reflects the average recommended exposure to the gold market among a subset of short-term gold timing newsletters tracked by the Hulbert Financial Digest. The HGNSI ended the day Tuesday at 11.5%.
That represents a decline of 23 percentage points for the day alone. And it is 54 percentage points below where this sentiment index stood as recently as last Tuesday, one week ago.
In fact, the last time the HGNSI was as low as it is today was at the end of this past November, when gold bullion (38099902:
38099902
News, chart, profile, more
Last:

Delayed quote data
Add to portfolio
Analyst
Create alert
Insider
Discuss
Financials
Sponsored by:
38099902, , ) was trading for around $785 an ounce, or about $150 an ounce less than where it is today.
In other words, the past week's correction has so spooked investors that they are just as bearish today as they were when bullion was a whole lot lower.
Rapid retreats to the exits are not usually seen at major market tops. At such times, according to followers of contrarian analysis, the typical reaction is to treat any pullback as a buying opportunity. Far from believing that the decline is the beginning of the end, advisers tend to consider it to be the pause that refreshes.
Perhaps the best illustration of this contrarian pattern in recent times is what happened to sentiment among stock market timers at the top of the market in March 2000, just as the Internet bubble was bursting. In the wake of the market's first 10% decline off its all-time high, the average short-term stock market timer tracked by the Hulbert Financial Digest was more bullish than he was at the top.
Now that's stubborn bullishness.
And it's anything but what we're seeing now in the gold market.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rubedo
Veteran Poster
Veteran Poster


Joined: 16 Sep 2007
Posts: 168

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you want to know about the "Cramer Consensus", just look at his website, thestreet.com's weekly poll. For most of the year, bullish sentiment was very low in the 20 and 30%, similar to other polls like the AAII. However, last week, it shot up to around 45%. And before last week, people were very bullish on gold. It was the number one voted sector in terms of bullishness. But after last week's plunge, people jumped off the bandwagon and voted it number one in terms of which sector they were most bearish on. And I've noticed tons of new articles talking about the commodity bubble bursting.

In terms of nobody is bullish the dollar, I've heard this over and over the past few years that everyone is bearish on the dollar. If you would've went long the dollar everytime you heard that "everyone was bearish on the dollar", you would've lost alot money over the years.

In terms of pessimism on the stock markets, below is from Ritholtz.

http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/03/bottom-callers.html

Bottom Callers Run Rampant
Monday, March 24, 2008 | 11:45 AM
in Markets | Psychology/Sentiment | Trading

Last week, I questioned the conventional wisdom which claimed that there was Not Enough Bullish Sentiment?

It seemed that there were plenty of Bulls who looked at the 15% pullback in the S&P500 as an ordinary dip-buying opportunity.

In a moderate recession, an 85 day, 15% drop would likely be insufficient to reflect the changes in both growth and earnings -- much less a deeper, more protracted recession.

The counter-argument is that the Fed has flooded so much cash onto the system, the recession no longer would matters.

Looking from a sentiment perspective, its hard to say that the we've seen the sort of fear that typically accompanies a lasting market bottom. There's still plenty of speculative juice around. Consider these headlines from over weekend:

• Barron's: Are You Ready for Dow 20,000 (this year!)
• Vince Farrell on We've Seen Our Bottom
• Barron's cover story: Hitting Bottom? Several Banks and Brokerages Are Ready to Pop Up for Air
• Jim Cramer on An End to the Bear Market? and why this is A Turning Point
• Insiders, at Least, See Reason to Smile
• Just about anything at Forbes.


The closest thing to an admonition of caution was Barron's Technical columnist, Michael Kahn, who called this The Market Bottom That Wasn't.

That doesn't mean we can't see a decent bounce here -- there's lots of liquidity, and as we saw last week, the market stopped going down on bad news. That's usually good for a 5-10-15% counter trend rally. We saw that begin last week.

But Dow 20,000 this year? I highly doubt it . .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11734
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Joe,

Sentiment is also very bearish on the USD - not to mention its oversold condition relative to its 200-day moving average.

From a fundamental standpoint, I expect the Euro Zone and the UK to start cutting earnestly later this year. The leading indicators in these two regions have been "performing" worse than the US leading indicators. I also expect the Euro Zone's trade balance to deteriorate as capital spending in China grows slowly this year. The Euro Zone has been benefiting hugely from heavy machinery buying from China - but going forward, the Chinese - at some point - will start competing with the Euro Zone in this area as well. U.S. exports in high technology, meanwhile, would still be untouchable at least for the next decade.

Best regards,

Henry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
joe0528
Junior Poster
Junior Poster


Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 24

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Henry,

What are the reasons you are bullish on USD now except you talked about the less dovish statement from Fed in their last meeting?

Bests,
Joe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11734
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am still not seeing any dollar bulls here - especially after this morning's move:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601101&sid=a73blAJuPsp4&refer=japan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
diesel
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 793
Location: Australia & New Zealand

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

rffrydr wrote:

Anybody have a sense of this, "Cramer Consensus"? One thing I think we can safely say that with 500up; 300down; 200up...there is no "trading consensus."


From what I see, there just isnt the consensus out there Cramer is talking of. The commodity community thinks this is just a correction to shake out the speculative longs, retail investors I know who were bullish through the recent correction are now gun shy and to top it all off (you'll love this rffrydr) my kids chocolate money is now denominated in euros rather than dollars!
_________________
All cats are gray in the dark.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16932
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes...a deeply repressed secret if anything like me. I got burned then; but options have allowed me the space to get that back on the last 3+ deviation move. But Madman Cramer is talking about equities--with the dollar, oil, financials as a backstory. And I can't remember seeing any of this last week--it was head for the hills with BSC and LEH burning in background, and even Goldman set to fall. It was all Fed trashing the dollar and hard assets uber alles.

Anybody have a sense of this, "Cramer Consensus"? One thing I think we can safely say that with 500up; 300down; 200up...there is no "trading consensus."
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11734
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

With regards to the USD, many analysts (you could've watched them on Bloomberg Video) were opening a rebound of the Dollar Index in the beginning of the year, right before the latest plunge ending March 18th. You don't see many of them now. They may be wishing for the USD to rise back up but I doubt many of them are taking a long position on the USD.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Please log in to view without the ad banners
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Page 9 of 9

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB