 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7213 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 2:50 am Post subject: Fannie (FNM) and Freddie (FRE) |
|
|
Both stocks bounced substantially since Friday afternoon and will most probably lead the next housing bull cycle, however muted it is (actually, the more muted the better, as long as the pipeline is growing). Now that the jumbo loan market is starting to freeze up as well, senators and regulators alike are entertaining the though of easing the caps of both quasi-government companies.
Following is courtesy of the WSJ:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Big Fans for Fannie, Freddie Some Lawmakers See
One-Time Pariah Firms As Subprime Salvation
By JAMES R. HAGERTY
August 8, 2007; Page C1
The mortgage-market meltdown isn't over, but it already has produced two clear winners: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the nation's biggest investors in home loans.
Until recently, politicians in Washington were arguing about how best to rein in the two giant government-sponsored companies, both recovering from accounting scandals and lapses in financial controls. Now, as worry about the housing market trumps accounting scruples, the political debate has shifted to whether Fannie and Freddie need to grow even bigger to buy more loans and calm mortgage investors.
Sen. Christopher Dodd (D., Conn.), chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, yesterday called on the companies' regulator to consider raising the caps placed last year on the amount of mortgages and related securities Fannie and Freddie can hold, as a way of ensuring that plenty of money is available to fund mortgage loans.
Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) also called for higher caps. Both Fannie and Freddie are pushing for the same move. A spokeswoman for their regulator, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, or Ofheo, said the agency will respond to the senators shortly.
Fannie's shares gained 3.1% to close at $64.43 on the New York Stock Exchange yesterday, while Freddie was up 2.7% to $61.64.
The two stocks have held steady over the past month amid anxiety over mortgage defaults, while shares of Countrywide Financial Corp., the nation's largest home-mortgage lender, have fallen 27%.
Fannie and Freddie are benefiting because investors are still happy to buy the mortgage securities they create, backed by loans purchased from lenders scattered across the country. The two companies collect fees for guaranteeing the interest and principal payments on the loans backing those securities. Although Fannie and Freddie are private-sector companies, they were created by Congress to funnel money into housing, and investors assume that Congress would bail them out in a crisis.
Sticking With Uncle Sam
With loan defaults rising and house prices falling, investors now are shunning, at least temporarily, mortgage securities packaged by Wall Street firms and others that don't have any implied backing from Uncle Sam. That makes it hard for lenders to find buyers for loans that can't be sold to Fannie and Freddie. Regulations prevent them from buying loans of more than $417,000 on single-family homes, and they have stricter standards on down payments and verification of income than were imposed by Wall Street during the housing boom.
The result is a spike in rates on some types of loans that can't be sold to Fannie or Freddie, such as prime, 30-year, fixed-rate jumbo loans, those above $417,000. Yesterday, the average rate on such loans was 7.44%, according to a survey by financial publishers HSH Associates. That's 0.84 percentage point higher than the average rate on "conforming" loans, those that meet Fannie and Freddie's standards. Typically over the past decade, the premium paid for jumbo loans has been around 0.20 to 0.30 point.
Even middle-class people often pay $500,000 to $700,000 for a humdrum home in high-cost areas. So the higher rates on jumbo loans could be "devastating" for the housing market in some areas, says Michael Menatian, president of Sanborn Mortgage Corp., a mortgage bank in West Hartford, Conn.
As lenders recoil from riskier types of mortgages, "we're turning a lot of people away now," says Jeff Lazerson, chief executive of Mortgage Grader, a mortgage broker in Laguna Niguel, Calif.
Many investors hope that alarm over the housing market will induce Ofheo to ease restraints on Fannie and Freddie.
But Joshua Rosner, an analyst at the New York research boutique Graham Fisher & Co., describes as "mass delusion" the idea that they can save the day for investors exposed to billions of dollars of ill-advised home loans now heading toward foreclosure. For one thing, he says, Ofheo has required Fannie and Freddie to follow stricter standards, recently imposed by banking regulators, in assessing borrowers' ability to repay. So they can't buy up loads of reckless loans to speculators or people failing to pay bills.
Richard Syron, chief executive of Freddie, agrees that there are limits to what his company can do. "Neither we nor anyone else can buy at par loans that probably shouldn't have been made in the first place," he says.
Freddie's Limited Help
Mr. Syron says Freddie can provide funding to refinance many subprime borrowers stuck with loans due to reset to sharply higher monthly payments, but not most of them. In addition, he says, Freddie could help the market by buying and holding more mortgage securities packaged by Wall Street if the cap on its holdings rises.
Fannie and Freddie may be able to buy subprime mortgage securities at discounts that more than make up for the credit risk, Kenneth Posner, an analyst at Morgan Stanley, said in a research note. They also may be able to charge more for providing guarantees on securities sold to others, he said: "We can't imagine anyone complaining -- right now there's no other game in town."
The flight of other investors from the mortgage market "does show the role and the need" for Freddie and Fannie to act as steady providers of mortgage funding, Mr. Syron says. Still, he says, Freddie isn't gloating: "You don't want to take a lot of joy in other people's suffering."
Write to James R. Hagerty at bob.hagerty@wsj.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7213 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Asking Freddie and Fannie for help - is still off the table, for now:
Marketwatch story |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7213 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Don't forget that Freddie will be reporting earnings tomorrow morning at 10am EST. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7213 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not a pretty sight, as Freddie reports its biggest loss ever and is now starving for more capital:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=asA4J74Q.qik&refer=home
| Quote: | A slump in the value of mortgages reduced core capital to $600 million more than its regulatory requirements, prompting Freddie Mac to seek more money. Fannie Mae, the largest buyer of mortgages, reported on Nov. 9 its loss more than doubled and said home prices will keep falling. Concern that the companies' credit expenses will rise further sent the stocks tumbling in the past four trading days to the lowest in a decade.
...
Freddie Mac's $713.1 billion portfolio as of September included $105 billion of securities backed by subprime mortgages.
``Even the strong credit managers with the best assets are not immune,'' said Jim Vogel, head of agency debt research at FTN Financial in Memphis, Tennessee. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7213 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Freddie due to report this Thursday. Following is a recap of the action in Freddie over the last six months courtesy of the Associated Press:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings Preview: Freddie Mac
Tuesday February 26, 3:30 pm ET
Weakening Mortgage and Housing Markets to Negatively Affect Freddie Mac's 4th-Quarter Earnings
NEW YORK (AP) -- Freddie Mac reports earnings for the fourth quarter on Thursday. The following is a summary of key developments and analyst opinion related to the period.
OVERVIEW: Mortgage financier and government sponsored enterprise Freddie Mac is facing major difficulties as the housing and mortgage markets continue to deteriorate. Freddie Mac is one of the largest purchasers of mortgages, along with fellow GSE Fannie Mae. The pair typically purchase only safe, traditional prime mortgages, but have some programs that allow for loans made to some riskier borrowers.
As defaults and delinquencies have risen across all loan types, not even Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae have been immune from having to take write-downs on the value of loans or to increase reserves to cover defaults.
Continued declines in home sales and house prices also limit Freddie Mac's growth potential as fewer mortgages are originated.
"The median U.S. house price has fallen 10 percent since its peak in the first quarter of 2007; we forecast a further 10 percent to 12 percent decline from current levels," Goldman Sachs Group Inc. analyst James Fotheringham, wrote in a recent note to clients. "House price depreciation is the key factor driving down growth in mortgage debt outstanding."
BY THE NUMBERS: Analysts polled by Thomson Financial, on average, forecast a loss of $2.34 per share for the quarter.
ANALYST TAKE: Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co. analyst Paul Miller expects Freddie Mac's fourth-quarter earnings to be affected by higher credit losses, wider credit spreads and possible write-downs.
Miller is anticipating the mortgage financier will lose $3 per share during the quarter. Miller said those losses will likely pressure Freddie Mac's capital requirements.
Fotheringham said he expects Freddie Mac's credit and derivative-related write-downs and credit costs to increase.
On Monday, Fotheringham cut his rating on Freddie Mac, to "Sell" from "Neutral" saying the nation is "only half way through this severe housing cycle." Fotheringham lowered his price target by 19 percent to $22.
WHAT'S AHEAD: Federal regulators have temporarily lifted the cap on the size of loans Freddie Mac can purchase in certain locations designated as high cost. Previously, Freddie Mac could only buy loans worth up to $417,000. Now the limit has been raised in some locations to as high as $729,750.
Miller said in the near-future, Freddie Mac will see little benefit from the increased loan limit, but if the higher limits are instituted permanently, it could increase market share and profitability. Though he cautioned that the increased profitability would also come with added risk on losses, because of the larger size of the loans.
STOCK PERFORMANCE: Shares of Freddie Mac fell 42 percent during the fourth quarter and 50 percent in 2007 to end the year at $34.07. Shares have since fallen an additional 23 percent, closing Monday at $26.18. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 6670 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd say the risk in this report is to the upside. The Agencies have already taken the hit from weak hands. No doubt there will be more. But these are Agencies, broad and deep. It may surprise many that the nation, as a whole, is still making payments on its homes. _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 6670 Location: Sunny California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7213 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 6670 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Freddie 25% under and there's the long nose of born-again Moody's once more:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/23385758 _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7213 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dknoester Senior Poster

Joined: 29 Jul 2005 Posts: 148 Location: Ontario
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 6670 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's in Bill's Top-Ten, as are another 4-5 bubbles in his top 12. He refined the search and found Texas--which you already knew, right ,Bill? I'm looking into his rec on Plano. But munis are clearly not the absolute they've always been taken to be. Becareful what you screen for is what you screen for. _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7213 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 6670 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's why he's a madman.
I like his Thornberg preferreds and even the charitible trust feature Annaly. _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nodoodahs Moderator


Joined: 06 May 2005 Posts: 1731 Location: TX
|
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rffrydr wrote: | | That's in Bill's Top-Ten, as are another 4-5 bubbles in his top 12. He refined the search and found Texas--which you already knew, right ,Bill? I'm looking into his rec on Plano. But munis are clearly not the absolute they've always been taken to be. Becareful what you screen for is what you screen for. | I have been short on time this week, and just started at the top! I'm sure that there are several good stories in those 30-odd locations, as well as some that had overly appreciated in the past and are falling in values now.
The other good thing is that it's a process; starting with a wider net than the 100 largest counties would get smaller municipalities that could be screened for growth and demographics ... if smaller munis are deemed to be attractive. _________________ He was wearing my Harvard tie. Can you believe it? My Harvard tie. Like oh, sure, HE went to Harvard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Please log in to view without the ad banners |
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|