| Author |
Global Warming Index Replies |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 16421 Location: Sunny California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11253 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11253 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
More on the global warming debate:
http://www.dailytech.com/New+Scandal+Erupts+over+NOAA+Climate+Data/article8347.htm
| Quote: | The theory of global warming began to explain one simple set of factsm-- surface temperature monitoring stations have shown a roughly one degree rise over the past century. But just where does these temperature readings come from? Most are reported by volunteer stations, usually no more than a thermometer inside a small wooden hut or below a roof overhang. In the US, 1,221 such stations exist, all administered by the National Climatic Data Center, a branch of the NOAA.
Two months ago, I reported on an effort to validate this network. A volunteer group headed by meteorologist Anthony Watts had found serious problems. Not only did sites fail to meet the NCDC's requirements, but encroaching development had put many in ridiculously unsuitable locations -- on hot black asphalt, next to trash burn barrels, beside heat exhaust vents, even attached to hot chimneys and above outdoor grills. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Geoffrey Junior Poster

Joined: 06 Apr 2006 Posts: 35
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Well, you know I'm already in the "denier" camp.
_________________
Bill R. |
More on the solar forcing that your link mentions.
http://www.realclimate.org/
see July 13, 2007 [It's the sun! (not)] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 16421 Location: Sunny California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mtvk Veteran Poster

Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Posts: 242
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
While USA could be leader in many scientific advancements, the
US auto industry is not. While US auto makers keep saying
any increase in price of car due to higher fuel efficiency will
reduce their sales, Japanese are selling more cars with
higher price and with higher fuel efficiency. Some times
I think if the auto industry bosses are given a kick back from
oil industry.
At present there is technology to have cars running at 7o or even
100 miles a gallon. PG&E demonstrated a Prius car with that high
fuel efficiency. http://www.google.org/recharge/ is taking the
leadership in this than the auto industry.
Many ingredients used in many cosmetics, home
construction, in cars and so on, are toxic and they do
have alternatives. But the industry doesn't like the change.
Leadership is missing. Whether global warming is a myth or
not, the awareness of the toxins and radiation to general
public need to be increased. Not just kept in research labs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nodoodahs Moderator

Joined: 06 May 2005 Posts: 2408
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lots of trade-offs involved, and no one with the moral authority to enforce them. Division of labor and capitalist exchange tends to increase pollutants by increasing industrial production, but it also increases quality of life and standards of living. The same production that pollutes enables millions to avoid starving from lack of food production, or dying in infancy from a lack of potable water or lack of access to simple chemical cures for childhood diseases.
Put me on the side of the polluters.
For what it's worth, the human tendency is to focus on problems after they've already passed their peak. See for reference the current war on smokers, when smoking was already on a decline for decades before the war commenced. _________________ I haven’t seen a beatin’ like that since somebody stuck a banana in my pants and turned a monkey loose. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mtvk Veteran Poster

Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Posts: 242
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
nodoodahs,
I understand deniers of Global warming. Global warming or
not, those who deny it can't close their eyes to diseases
that the air pollution has caused.
In the evolution of human beings, humans were not subjected
to this much air pollution. Same with radiation. In the name of
economic growth alone one can't close their eyes to these
side effects. While many human advancements were good
for the humans and the rest of the species, air pollution
caused by fossil fuel burning and other toxic chemicals
released by so many industries are not.
Chinese stock market may soar, but the health of many Chinese
may get worse. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nodoodahs Moderator

Joined: 06 May 2005 Posts: 2408
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, you know I'm already in the "denier" camp. _________________ I haven’t seen a beatin’ like that since somebody stuck a banana in my pants and turned a monkey loose.
Last edited by nodoodahs on Mon Mar 01, 2010 1:00 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11253 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ongoing debate about Global Warming. Note that I haven't done any research on this issue at this stage, but just wanted to post some arguments:
http://www.dailytech.com/NOAA+Global+Warming+Data+Challenged/article7723.htm
| Quote: | | California meteorologist Anthony Watts began surveying these sites recently, to see just how well they're being maintained. His site, surfacestations.org, has detailed a surprising number being operated in a manner guaranteed to compromise their data. The problem is recent development, which has placed many sites next to direct or indirect sources of heat. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 16421 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Drought scare, particularly world: Urals, Australia, etc. got grains pegged on highs. _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 16421 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Heat migrating up the Mississippi from to New Orleans to Chicago (vs. rising through Texas normally) robust early indicator of drought.
Of course there's a drought every year in the grain market. I'll be looking to exit short corn calls. _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nodoodahs Moderator

Joined: 06 May 2005 Posts: 2408
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 10:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
It might be fair to say that speculative interest in any commodity contract varies with said contract's movement, and speculative interest can create a feedback loop. Gold may be an extreme example; used by miners and industries to hedge their costs of production or streamline profits, when it moves up, it's primarily because the speculators create contracts with no intention of delivering (or accepting delivery).
Index construction is fraught with peril. The devil is truly in the details. _________________ I haven’t seen a beatin’ like that since somebody stuck a banana in my pants and turned a monkey loose. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Geoffrey Junior Poster

Joined: 06 Apr 2006 Posts: 35
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nodoodahs Moderator

Joined: 06 May 2005 Posts: 2408
|
Posted: Tue May 22, 2007 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Most likely, you'll be simply providing liquidity to an industry that needs a hedge. In other words, your profits (losses) will help stabilize the earnings flow of utilities providers.
Many if not most of the "deniers," myself included, will be ignoring those contracts. _________________ I haven’t seen a beatin’ like that since somebody stuck a banana in my pants and turned a monkey loose. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Please log in to view without the ad banners |
 |
|