MarketThoughts.com Home Page
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  StatisticsStatistics   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Global Warming Index

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Global Warming Index
Geoffrey
Junior Poster
Junior Poster


Joined: 06 Apr 2006
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 10:55 am    Post subject: Global Warming Index Reply with quote

http://www.ubs.com/1/e/media_overview/media_emea/mediareleases.html?newsId=117789

I like the idea of taking money from global warming deniers, assuming that's who would be on the opposite side of the trade.

Only based on 15 US cities so far, so not really global.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary
Author Global Warming Index Replies
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16421
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 10:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nothing is obvious:


http://www.economist.com/science-technology/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15543691
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11253
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One more piece. Sorry - I just have to put this on here. We have come full circle since April 1975, when Newsweek published an article on "Global Cooling."

http://www.wmconnolley.org.uk/sci/iceage/newsweek-coolingworld.pdf
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11253
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

More on the global warming debate:

http://www.dailytech.com/New+Scandal+Erupts+over+NOAA+Climate+Data/article8347.htm

Quote:
The theory of global warming began to explain one simple set of factsm-- surface temperature monitoring stations have shown a roughly one degree rise over the past century. But just where does these temperature readings come from? Most are reported by volunteer stations, usually no more than a thermometer inside a small wooden hut or below a roof overhang. In the US, 1,221 such stations exist, all administered by the National Climatic Data Center, a branch of the NOAA.

Two months ago, I reported on an effort to validate this network. A volunteer group headed by meteorologist Anthony Watts had found serious problems. Not only did sites fail to meet the NCDC's requirements, but encroaching development had put many in ridiculously unsuitable locations -- on hot black asphalt, next to trash burn barrels, beside heat exhaust vents, even attached to hot chimneys and above outdoor grills.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Geoffrey
Junior Poster
Junior Poster


Joined: 06 Apr 2006
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Well, you know I'm already in the "denier" camp.

_________________
Bill R.


More on the solar forcing that your link mentions.

http://www.realclimate.org/

see July 13, 2007 [It's the sun! (not)]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16421
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 3:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The New Carbon "Market":

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/06/20/business/money.php
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mtvk
Veteran Poster
Veteran Poster


Joined: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 242

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

While USA could be leader in many scientific advancements, the
US auto industry is not. While US auto makers keep saying
any increase in price of car due to higher fuel efficiency will
reduce their sales, Japanese are selling more cars with
higher price and with higher fuel efficiency. Some times
I think if the auto industry bosses are given a kick back from
oil industry.

At present there is technology to have cars running at 7o or even
100 miles a gallon. PG&E demonstrated a Prius car with that high
fuel efficiency. http://www.google.org/recharge/ is taking the
leadership in this than the auto industry.

Many ingredients used in many cosmetics, home
construction, in cars and so on, are toxic and they do
have alternatives. But the industry doesn't like the change.

Leadership is missing. Whether global warming is a myth or
not, the awareness of the toxins and radiation to general
public need to be increased. Not just kept in research labs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nodoodahs
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 2408

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lots of trade-offs involved, and no one with the moral authority to enforce them. Division of labor and capitalist exchange tends to increase pollutants by increasing industrial production, but it also increases quality of life and standards of living. The same production that pollutes enables millions to avoid starving from lack of food production, or dying in infancy from a lack of potable water or lack of access to simple chemical cures for childhood diseases.

Put me on the side of the polluters.

For what it's worth, the human tendency is to focus on problems after they've already passed their peak. See for reference the current war on smokers, when smoking was already on a decline for decades before the war commenced.
_________________
I haven’t seen a beatin’ like that since somebody stuck a banana in my pants and turned a monkey loose.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mtvk
Veteran Poster
Veteran Poster


Joined: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 242

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nodoodahs,

I understand deniers of Global warming. Global warming or
not, those who deny it can't close their eyes to diseases
that the air pollution has caused.

In the evolution of human beings, humans were not subjected
to this much air pollution. Same with radiation. In the name of
economic growth alone one can't close their eyes to these
side effects. While many human advancements were good
for the humans and the rest of the species, air pollution
caused by fossil fuel burning and other toxic chemicals
released by so many industries are not.

Chinese stock market may soar, but the health of many Chinese
may get worse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nodoodahs
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 2408

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, you know I'm already in the "denier" camp.
_________________
I haven’t seen a beatin’ like that since somebody stuck a banana in my pants and turned a monkey loose.


Last edited by nodoodahs on Mon Mar 01, 2010 1:00 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11253
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ongoing debate about Global Warming. Note that I haven't done any research on this issue at this stage, but just wanted to post some arguments:

http://www.dailytech.com/NOAA+Global+Warming+Data+Challenged/article7723.htm

Quote:
California meteorologist Anthony Watts began surveying these sites recently, to see just how well they're being maintained. His site, surfacestations.org, has detailed a surprising number being operated in a manner guaranteed to compromise their data. The problem is recent development, which has placed many sites next to direct or indirect sources of heat.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16421
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Drought scare, particularly world: Urals, Australia, etc. got grains pegged on highs.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16421
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2007 7:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Heat migrating up the Mississippi from to New Orleans to Chicago (vs. rising through Texas normally) robust early indicator of drought.

Of course there's a drought every year in the grain market. I'll be looking to exit short corn calls.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nodoodahs
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 2408

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 10:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It might be fair to say that speculative interest in any commodity contract varies with said contract's movement, and speculative interest can create a feedback loop. Gold may be an extreme example; used by miners and industries to hedge their costs of production or streamline profits, when it moves up, it's primarily because the speculators create contracts with no intention of delivering (or accepting delivery).

Index construction is fraught with peril. The devil is truly in the details.
_________________
I haven’t seen a beatin’ like that since somebody stuck a banana in my pants and turned a monkey loose.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Geoffrey
Junior Poster
Junior Poster


Joined: 06 Apr 2006
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 9:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Most likely, you'll be simply providing liquidity to an industry that needs a hedge.


I suspected as much. They would probably get less interest in the fund by calling it the "North American Weather Futures Index", and backtesting might give a chart like: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/new.Fig.D_lrg.gif

Whereas a true "Global Mean Surface Temperature Index", might look more like this: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.A2_lrg.gif
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nodoodahs
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 2408

PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 12:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Most likely, you'll be simply providing liquidity to an industry that needs a hedge. In other words, your profits (losses) will help stabilize the earnings flow of utilities providers.

Many if not most of the "deniers," myself included, will be ignoring those contracts.
_________________
I haven’t seen a beatin’ like that since somebody stuck a banana in my pants and turned a monkey loose.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Please log in to view without the ad banners
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


|Krakow House for Sale| Powered by phpBB