 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
January effect |
probtrader Senior Poster


Joined: 22 Oct 2005 Posts: 130
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 7:09 am Post subject: January effect |
|
|
Going long a microcap index and short the SP500 from the end of December to the end of January gives a very good expectancy based on stock market returns over the last 10 years.
Here I used DFSCX as a proxy for the microcap index:
Period: [1996-Jun-20/2006-Dec-14]
Trades: 10
Avg trade: 5.15686%
Std dev: 6.52797%
Skew: 94.5309
Pos trades: 8 (80%)
Neg trades: 2 (20%)
Avg pos: 6.74405%
Avg neg: -1.19191%
Best: 19.5775%
Worst: -1.21317%
Max cons pos: 6
Max cons neg: 1
Max Drawdown: -1.21317%
Problem is, I don't know of any product that I can use to leverage a microcap index position. There is a Value Line future, traded on the KBOT, but my broker doesn't support this exchange. The Russell 2000 e-mini, based on small caps, gives good results, but not as good as DFSCX.
Does anybody have an idea of how to implement the long side of the spread? I also looked at DITM IWC options but I'm not too familiar with options and spreads look very high.
--
DFSCX: Bought 1 4.79 1996-Dec-20 (Fri), Sold 1 5 1997-Jan-29 (Wed), Factor 1.04384
SP500: Shorted 1 748.87 1996-Dec-20 (Fri), Covered 1 772.5 1997-Jan-29 (Wed), Factor 0.969411
DFSCX: Bought 1 5.77 1997-Dec-22 (Mon), Sold 1 5.89 1998-Jan-29 (Thu), Factor 1.0208
SP500: Shorted 1 953.7 1997-Dec-22 (Mon), Covered 1 985.49 1998-Jan-29 (Thu), Factor 0.967742
DFSCX: Bought 1 5.26 1998-Dec-21 (Mon), Sold 1 5.65 1999-Jan-29 (Fri), Factor 1.07414
SP500: Shorted 1 1202.84 1998-Dec-21 (Mon), Covered 1 1279.64 1999-Jan-29 (Fri), Factor 0.939983
DFSCX: Bought 1 6.67 1999-Dec-20 (Mon), Sold 1 7.65 2000-Jan-28 (Fri), Factor 1.14693
SP500: Shorted 1 1418.09 1999-Dec-20 (Mon), Covered 1 1360.16 2000-Jan-28 (Fri), Factor 1.04259
DFSCX: Bought 1 6.42 2000-Dec-20 (Wed), Sold 1 7.74 2001-Jan-29 (Mon), Factor 1.20561
SP500: Shorted 1 1264.74 2000-Dec-20 (Wed), Covered 1 1364.17 2001-Jan-29 (Mon), Factor 0.927113
DFSCX: Bought 1 8.14 2001-Dec-20 (Thu), Sold 1 8.4 2002-Jan-29 (Tue), Factor 1.03194
SP500: Shorted 1 1139.93 2001-Dec-20 (Thu), Covered 1 1100.64 2002-Jan-29 (Tue), Factor 1.0357
DFSCX: Bought 1 7.32 2002-Dec-20 (Fri), Sold 1 7.22 2003-Jan-29 (Wed), Factor 0.986339
SP500: Shorted 1 895.76 2002-Dec-20 (Fri), Covered 1 864.36 2003-Jan-29 (Wed), Factor 1.03633
DFSCX: Bought 1 11.53 2003-Dec-22 (Mon), Sold 1 12.44 2004-Jan-29 (Thu), Factor 1.07892
SP500: Shorted 1 1092.94 2003-Dec-22 (Mon), Covered 1 1134.11 2004-Jan-29 (Thu), Factor 0.963698
DFSCX: Bought 1 13.56 2004-Dec-20 (Mon), Sold 1 13.14 2005-Jan-28 (Fri), Factor 0.969027
SP500: Shorted 1 1194.65 2004-Dec-20 (Mon), Covered 1 1171.36 2005-Jan-28 (Fri), Factor 1.01988
DFSCX: Bought 1 14.64 2005-Dec-20 (Tue), Sold 1 16.02 2006-Jan-27 (Fri), Factor 1.09426
SP500: Shorted 1 1259.62 2005-Dec-20 (Tue), Covered 1 1283.72 2006-Jan-27 (Fri), Factor 0.981226 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Author |
January effect Replies |
nodoodahs Moderator

Joined: 06 May 2005 Posts: 2408
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm gonna post on this on the blog, not your specific instance, but similar, so I'll keep it short here.
With in-the-money, the same risk capital (premium) controls fewer contracts. Your payout matrix at expiry is similar to long stock, in that you have to take a big adverse move to lose your risk capital. Each contract is x $ per y points of movement.
With at-the-money, you control more contracts, so each move past in-the-money is better and bigger. However, any adverse move causes loss of risk capital at expiry. You would need to trade out of the options at some point if they don't make it. However, if the move is in your favor, but still out of the money at trade time, you have exercised greater leverage (returns on risk capital) than you would have with in-the-money.
Similar thoughts with out-of-the-money, still more contracts and still more leverage, you need to trade prior to expiry if not in the money.
This is all assuming your bet size (risk capital allocated) is constant.
I haven't examined your trade in detail, but from some work I've done with equal bet sizes, non-in-the-money options provide the most $ per point moved and the least capital commitment, but! I don't like the payout matrix or the need to trade out of them. In the money, not as much $ per point, but less capital for an equal risk size and can hold to expiry.
Hope that helps. _________________ I haven’t seen a beatin’ like that since somebody stuck a banana in my pants and turned a monkey loose. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 16939 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, slip of the finger. But I'm really surprised your broker doesn't KBOT. The platforms now link pretty much globally--and if not, I've always been able to phone in the order (traded the old ECUnint bonds vs. German bonds--not good on the margin stats when one country is on catholic holiday schedule)
Futures 5% margin, way to go. Deep in the money options cost and bid/ask on the deep outs in the numbers you need to get the leverage will eat big chunks--and many ofthe ETF options are illiquid anyway.
This effect has also been demonstrated across nationalities so not entirely a tax-effect. But this isn't an ordinary year, and the large caps ARE now the contrary play. GE is taking off--could be defensiveness with consumer non-cycles. I've done this trade with the Russell; wouldn't do it with that now. And balance those dollar values!
PS I think the effect is stronger leaving out the last week. _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
probtrader Senior Poster


Joined: 22 Oct 2005 Posts: 130
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nodoodahs wrote: | At the money or deep out of the money will give you most leverage, if you equalize risk exposure. Of course, then you need to trade them prior to expiry ...
Spread is probably the least of your concerns if the trade is good.
Low vol means good low premiums. |
So let's see. Here's what I have from Yahoo options for March expiration:
Strike Symbol Last Chg Bid Ask Vol Open Int
50.00 IWCCX.X 6.40 0.00 8.10 8.60 5 5
54.00 IWCCB.X 3.30 0.00 4.70 5.10 1 7
55.00 IWCCC.X 5.00 0.00 3.90 4.30 1 24
56.00 IWCCD.X 3.60 0.00 3.20 3.60 1 30
57.00 IWCCE.X 1.70 0.00 2.50 2.90 1 1
58.00 IWCCF.X 1.25 0.00 2.00 2.20 3 3
60.00 IWCCH.X 1.45 0.00 1.00 1.25 3 3
The IWC is trading around $57.60, so I would go for the $50 strike. The spread is .50, that's around 6% of the premium.
Lets say I decide to buy 17 contracts at $8.60, the total cost would be 100*8.60*17 = $14,620 to control 1700*57.60 = $97,920 in IWC cash value.
6% spread of $14,620 premium is $877 or around 0.9% of cash value ($877 divided into $97,920).
That means I'm starting with a penalty of around 1% for a strategy that has an average 2.55% return.
Did I calculate this right?
Last edited by probtrader on Wed Dec 20, 2006 5:44 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
probtrader Senior Poster


Joined: 22 Oct 2005 Posts: 130
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nodoodahs wrote: | At the money or deep out of the money will give you most leverage, if you equalize risk exposure. Of course, then you need to trade them prior to expiry ...
Spread is probably the least of your concerns if the trade is good.
Low vol means good low premiums. |
So let's see. Here's what I have from Yahoo options for March expiration:
Strike Symbol Last Chg Bid Ask Vol Open Int
50.00 IWCCX.X 6.40 0.00 8.10 8.60 5 5
54.00 IWCCB.X 3.30 0.00 4.70 5.10 1 7
55.00 IWCCC.X 5.00 0.00 3.90 4.30 1 24
56.00 IWCCD.X 3.60 0.00 3.20 3.60 1 30
57.00 IWCCE.X 1.70 0.00 2.50 2.90 1 1
58.00 IWCCF.X 1.25 0.00 2.00 2.20 3 3
60.00 IWCCH.X 1.45 0.00 1.00 1.25 3 3
The IWC is trading around $57.60, so I would go for the $50 strike. The spread is .50, that's around 6% of the premium.
Lets say I decide to buy 17 contracts at $8.60, the total cost would be 100*8.60*17 = $14,620 to control 17*57.60 = $97,920 in IWC cash value.
6% spread of $14,620 premium is $877 or around 0.9% of cash value ($877 divided into $97,920).
That means I'm running the strategy starting with a penalty of around -1% (the average strategy return over the last 10 years is 5.15%).
Did I calculate this right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
probtrader Senior Poster


Joined: 22 Oct 2005 Posts: 130
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| rffrydr wrote: | | Check again, maybe they just don't want to. Any futures broker that trades grain trades the CBOT--and that means any broker who's been around for more than 10years. |
The value line index future trades on KBOT, not CBOT.
| Quote: | | You can also pick a basket of stocks--but may have margin problems or dead money problems. |
Yep, spreads on microcaps are too high. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nodoodahs Moderator

Joined: 06 May 2005 Posts: 2408
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
At the money or deep out of the money will give you most leverage, if you equalize risk exposure. Of course, then you need to trade them prior to expiry ...
Spread is probably the least of your concerns if the trade is good.
Low vol means good low premiums. _________________ I haven’t seen a beatin’ like that since somebody stuck a banana in my pants and turned a monkey loose. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
probtrader Senior Poster


Joined: 22 Oct 2005 Posts: 130
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HenryTo wrote: | | How about using IWC? The Russell microcap ETF? As opposed to a futures contract? |
Yea, but with an ETF I can only go 2:1. Given the worst trade over the last 10 years and that it's almost a market-risk free trade, I'd like to dare a little more.
I also checked deep-in-the-money options but those spreads look terrible to me, aren't they? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 16939 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Check again, maybe they just don't want to. Any futures broker that trades grain trades the KBOT--and that means any broker who's been around for more than 10years.
Make sure you have enough $ to equal dollar-ratio the two sides and still take the volitility. And watch that they give you the margin credit.
You can also pick a basket of stocks--but may have margin problems or dead money problems. _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Last edited by rffrydr on Tue Dec 19, 2006 11:24 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11740 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| How about using IWC? The Russell microcap ETF? As opposed to a futures contract? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nodoodahs Moderator

Joined: 06 May 2005 Posts: 2408
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
You've got 10 days to find another broker?
I like the thought process ... _________________ I haven’t seen a beatin’ like that since somebody stuck a banana in my pants and turned a monkey loose. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Please log in to view without the ad banners |
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB
|