| Author |
Latest ECRI Weekly Leading Index Readings Replies |
dash Veteran Poster

Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 488
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Annual ROC readings have progressed steadily from the mid-3s in early March. I had a quick look through the data presented here, which only go as far back as August 2005, and we haven't had any numbers in the 6s until very recently.
| Quote: | | Leads - the WLI has an average lead of 10 months at business cycle peaks and three months at business cycle troughs, which amounts to a longer overall lead than the LEI. |
The weakest numbers I could find were back in September 2006, roughly 3 months before the weak Q1 GDP numbers, and since then the data have gone from strength to strength. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11260 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Week ending 6/8/2007:
WLI = 143.8
Annual ROC = 6.9%
Last week's readings were revised to 143.2 and 6.7%, respectively. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11260 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Week ending 6/1/2007:
WLI = 142.9
Annual ROC = 6.3%
Last week's WLI reading was revised to 142.5. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11260 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Week ending 5/25/2007:
WLI = 142.4
Annual ROC = 6.3%
No revisions to last week's numbers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11260 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Week ending 5/18/2007:
WLI = 142.4
Annual ROC = 6.4%
Last week's WLI was again revised to 142.6, but this revision did not change the Annual ROC. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11260 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Week ending 5/11/2007:
WLI = 142.7
Annual ROC = 6.1%
Last week's WLI was revised to 142.6, but this revision did not change the Annual ROC. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11260 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Week ending 5/4/2007:
WLI = 142.7
Annual ROC = 5.2%
No revision to last week's numbers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11260 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Week ending 4/27/2007:
WLI = 142.4
Annual ROC = 4.4%
Last week's numbers were revised to 141.1 and 3.6%, respectively. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11260 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Week ending 4/20/2007:
WLI = 141.6
Annual ROC = 4.0%
Last week's numbers were not revised. The weak 1Q GDP number is a most probably a reflection of the weak ECRI numbers during August to early September of last year. Assuming that the ECRI numbers will continue to "work" going forward, we should see a rebound in the 2Q GDP numbers (the stock market is certainly discounting such a "reacceleration" scenario). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11260 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Week ending 4/13/2007:
WLI = 140.4
Annual ROC = 3.6%
Last week's numbers were revised to 140.3 and 3.6%, respectively. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11260 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Week ending 4/6/2007:
WLI = 140.6
Annual ROC = 3.8%
Last week's WLI number was revised to 140.2. No revision was made to the annual ROC. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11260 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Week ending 3/30/2007:
WLI = 140.3
Annual ROC = 3.9%
Last week's numbers were revised to 140.5 and 4.0%, respectively. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 16445 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
...Yes, though those categories are being blurred (to the extreme in the IBM/India article) and I'm still with Roach on the under-representation of manufacturing--it's my So. Cal. location bias. And the politco he's featured with does well to underscore the big (global) picture.
I also suspected (and posted) those summer cuts would be taken back but am still bearish going into Christmas. This is tied to credit contraction basis the slow burn in Assets. Office property hasn't yet begun. Start looking to places like South Carolina to be on more corporate letter-heads.
For better or worse this is still a quantitative model and judging him on his social skills he's a quant guy. That means he's been burned by human frailty sometime before and doesn't trust his own nature--revealed in his last minute freudian-slip of a "hunch" on the real estate market.
Something inside is telling him that Real Estate HAS to alright--and the cycle will trump "dislocations."
Others, myself included, exaggerate a point to say the opposite: Real Estate (Real Assets) ARE the cycle.
Another question: what good is ten-months warning in a bubble? How much do you loose trying to save 20%? --As a businessman. _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dash Veteran Poster

Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 488
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Achuthan interview on Payrolls and the "false" recession posted on Bloomberg.com today. |
Thanks rffrydr for pointing this out, I'd have missed it otherwise. For me the most important point he makes is with respect to service jobs creation, where the gain was 137K. It's ironic that most of the economic data which are reported relate to the manufacturing sector and very few give a picture of what's happening in the service sector. The jobs data does do this.
As he points out, the debate will probably now shift to whether the Fed needs to start hiking, and this will probably depend on how quickly the inflation data moderate. The short-end of the treasury curve is getting hit, and yields still look way too low to me, especially as you 'ride up the curve' with the passage of time.
We're back to being a bit overbought in the short-term, but it looks to me like the subprime worries were just what was needed to get people worried again and the selloff has once again created enough momentum for us to move on to new highs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 16445 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Achuthan interview on Payrolls and the "false" recession posted on Bloomberg.com today.
Note his comments on Globalization. _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Please log in to view without the ad banners |
 |
|