 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7177 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dash Veteran Poster

Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 473
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7177 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dash, thanks for the link.
I sat through a lunch hosted by Marty Fridson on high yield bonds yesterday - and after sitting through it, I had a huge urge to go out there and start placing a bet for these instruments to decline substantially in price.
I will post an update tonight in our mid-week commentary on high yields. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 6587 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nov. thru Feb. High Yield disappeared. _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 6587 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MS says indicies masking overvaluation (read oil). _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7177 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dash,
I just read the MS commentary - the last "full house" sell signal was April 2002, not early 2000. I will correct that in this weekend's commentary.
Thanks,
Henry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dash Veteran Poster

Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 473
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ooops. Just goes to show that MarketThoughts is a much more reliable source of info than Bespoke Thanks for the correction.
I don't follow the European markets closely, but I was a bit surprised to hear MS thinks stocks are expensive relative to bonds. Here in the US, until recently, the relative cheapness of stocks vs bonds has been one of the main arguments underpinning the rise. In fact a dividend yield of 5.90% still looks largely supportive, even with 10yr yields now at 5%. So it seems to me that the sudden rise in yields, rather than their absolute levels is the main concern at the moment.
Here's Citibank with a slightly different take on this:
| Quote: | | US equity investors have become far more concerned this week, as 10-year treasury yields have approached 5%, fearing that valuations will begin to be in jeopardy of contracting. We add equity risk premium to bond yields, which provides a stronger correlation with P/Es than the traditional Fed Model. This approach is still signaling strong gains for stocks ahead. Admittedly, if the 10-year treasury yield increased to 5.5%(all else equal), this would not be a positive sign for equities, but this is not in our forecast. We believe that investors are still skeptical, and our Panic/Euphoria model is nowhere near Euphoric levels as in 1987 or the last 1990s. Indeed, this gauge is signaling a better than 90% probability of positive six-month forward gains for US stocks. Our six- and 12-month outlook continues to be upbeat, and we do not expect small pullbacks to change our longer-term outlook. Thus, we would be buyers during market weakness. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7177 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dash, you're too kind, as always. I'll correct that in this weekend's commentary as well as list the dates of the prior signals.
Given the proliferation of hedge funds, private equity funds, and the huge weighting of the financial sector within the S&P 500, I would say that there is already some euphoria in the financial markets today, but that is not happening in equities as much as in other asset classes, such as real estate, commodities, EM securities, and high yield bonds.
Note the last chart I showed in the commentary this morning. If that isn't an indicator of euphoria, what is?
I am not sure why there isn't more speculation in equities, but perhaps the coupon payments, interest rates, yield spreads, and default risk is just much easier to model for hedge funds (even for a supercomputer) than equities are. Moreover, retail investors tend to speculate in equities as opposed to other vehicles, and they are still more or less out of the market right now, aside from mutual fund investments in their 401(k) or 403(b) porfolios. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7177 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 11:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| So my take on all this is: The final top in equities have not come yet, but if we endure a significant correction in the high yield, commodity, or EM security market, then that will no doubt drag stocks down as well. Most probably not to as much as the extent we saw in Fall 1998, but it is probably going to be at least the 10% correction we have been looking for. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dash Veteran Poster

Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 473
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, those were scary charts in the mid-week commentary, especially for anyone holding a lot of junk debt. This said, the recent rise in yields has hit treasuries just as hard as corporate debt, so, so far at least, interest rate rises don't seem to be happening because of a mass exit from high yield. Similarly, the selloff in late Feb was (supposedly) caused by a reduced appetite for risk. Stable corporate bond spreads aren't an indication that this is now happening, though demand for credit default swaps is on the rise.
Spreads on inflation linked treasuries have also been steady, so it doesn't seem like higher yileds are being driven by inflationary fears either.
Interestingly, the yield curve is now fully upward sloping as yields on medium to longer maturities have risen more than the short-end of the curve. An inverted curve didn't lead to a recession or a bear market (at least not so far), so will an upward sloping curve be an accurate indicator of a period of future economic strength? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 6587 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Citibank like a lotta investors is going down looking for the rabid retail investor--they'll never find him. He's paying his mortgage(s). To add insult to injury the Schwabs of the world are consolidating--out of weakness.
T-bills below funds:
It's not inflation, and not economic slowdown. The dollar isn't rallying and the spreads over treasuries are not coming off. It's that old bugaboo the Current Account as sparked by the China Bull and the disengaging from the dollar by petromoney. The stage was set weeks ago with big chinese buying of T-bills (over bonds); dollar selloff on their sovereign funds; Kuwait and Syria unpegging to the dollar; and PE going bonkers to suck up the bottom of the punchbowl. Then, the pricing of Blackstone as China commits. The new Japanese?
ps The Wed before expiration friday
It's not a bear until Apple and The GOOG join the party. _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dash Veteran Poster

Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 473
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm still having a hard time understanding MS comment about European P/Es being at record highs. Perhaps the Telegraph journalist misquotes him, but even if that's not the case the premise is that valuations have become much less attractive, and the latest market commentary also points out that equities are at their most expensive levels since May 2006.
Nevertheless, if you look at what's happened to P/E ratios since this bull market began (early 2003) then in the majority of cases we've actually seen a decline. Here's a post from Ticker Sense with the data:
http://tickersense.typepad.com/ticker_sense/2007/06/global_returns_.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 6587 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think it's the Oils/chemicals selling at peak cycle lows (and a few assorted related basic materials e.g. steel). Heavy representation in DAX. Less in the SP but still creates heavy skew. _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7177 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mr. Draaisma of Morgan Stanley is back again - this time says to go to cash again:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ddeb0f1c-915a-11dc-9590-0000779fd2ac.html
| Quote: | Teun Draaisma, head of the investment bank’s equity strategy team, called on investors to cash in recent profits in equities and said cash was now the investment class of choice.
Mr Draaisma’s equity team told investors to sell equities in June, just before the market began a downward spiral, and to buy in mid-August, just before the market resumed its climb.
Graham Secker, equity strategist and a member of Mr Draaisma’s team, said it was a confluence of signals, rather than any one factor, that led the group to alter its stance. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 6587 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
He's bullish on value...soon:
| Quote: | Valuation factors have underperformed similarly in the past around market turning points, lasting 12 months on average. Based on the US composite valuation factor, which goes back to 1973, we have identified three comparable periods when valuation factors have stopped driving returns - Aug79 to Nov80, Mar89 to Oct90 and May98 to Feb00. The average return and duration of these periods were minus 16% and 12 months respectively. Between Feb07 and Dec07, the composite valuation factor have produced a negative 14% return over 10 months, and hence, based on comparison with history, we believe we may be close to a turning point today. For the first two months of 2008, we have already seen a positive 1%
return on this composite valuation factor strategy in Europe, and +3% in the US.
We expect valuation factors to work again in 2008, as valuation spreads are at all-time highs, and some key fundamental factors are also
about to turn. Recession fears cause valuation spreads to widen as earnings and fundamentals are called into question, and that is what drove negative return among valuation factors in the last 6 to 12 months. At current levels, valuation dispersions are close to 3 standard deviations wider than usual in the US, which has always been a great signal for valuation factors to start working again. Our backtest shows that the composite valuation factor in Europe returns 18% in the subsequent 12 months after a +2 standard deviation signal, and such strategy has produced a positive return in all occasions. The comparable number in the US is 16%. For 2008, we are also expecting an earnings recession in Europe, return on equity to roll over and inflation to stabilise and/or fall, all of which have been good leading indicators for the turning point in valuation factors.
PM:
Key stock picking factors for 2008 will be cheap valuation, positive earnings revision, high cash flow and low leverage. Looking at the subsequent 12 month period when valuation factors start to work again, both in Europe and US, the most obvious conclusion is that valuation factors become the most important group of factors that drive return and momentum ceased to work in these periods. In addition, positive earnings revision,
strong liquidity positions, high cash flow and low leverage are also key in terms of drivers of returns. We currently also advocate a large cap bias.
Surprising turnaround pair trades if valuation factors come back to the fore. If valuation factors start to be important again later in 2008, as we expect, the following pair trades would be examples of what may start to work in the next 6-12 months – Long Kingfisher, short H&M or Inditex; Long UBS, short Julius Baer; Long UPM, short ENRC; Long Wolseley, short ABB or Alstom; Long Casino, short BAT; Long Ericsson, short SAP; Long Sanofi, short Qiagen; Long Deutsche Telekom, short Iliad; Long Centrica, short Verbund (see p.11 for more details). These trades would catch many investors off guard, including in some instances ourselves and our analysts.
PM:
Buy our valuation-based stock baskets. If we were on the buy side we would put up to one-third of our money in low turnover, quantitative stock picking tools that we believe in logically, and that have a good track record. The Joel-Greenblatt inspired long-short strategy, the Europe target equity screen and the Benjamin Graham inspired value screen are three of our favourite tools. In 2007, the Greenblatt long-short strategy returned 21%, the
Europe target equity screen outperformed by 3% and the Benjamin Graham screen underperformed by 4%. The performance numbers for the first two months of 2008 are +4%, +7% and +2% respectively. The following stocks appear on all three of our favourite screens – BP, Total, ENI, Barratt and Bang & Olufsen. |
_________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Please log in to view without the ad banners |
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|