MarketThoughts.com Home Page
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  StatisticsStatistics   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Peak Oil?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 25, 26, 27 ... 30, 31, 32  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Peak Oil?
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11260
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 12:24 pm    Post subject: Peak Oil? Reply with quote

Dear all,

I would like to start a discussion/argument on the validity of the Peak Oil theorists on this board. One of my subscribers had asked me to do this - and I believe it will be a very well worthwhile discussion!

I know there has been a lot of literature written about this - including recent books - but one thing that I find lacking is the fact that many of the commentators talk about the industry in VERY BROAD terms. That is, economists who are working with questionable data - questionable because of the lack of transparency in the oil markets, not because it is their fault.

I feel that Matt Simmons had done a great job in his efforts to focus on the Saudi oil machine. He spent an entire book just writing about the Saudi oil industry, and makes a very good argument which discredits the Saudis' claims that they can ramp up to 15 mm barrels a day in a few years. In all likelihood, he argues, Saudi oil output has peaked or is near peaking. We need similar analyses for the Russian oil industry, the North Sea, Iranian, and Venezuelan oil production.

Going forward, this author is bullish on the price of oil in the long-run, as I believe oil demand growth in both China and India will surpass the ability of the world to pump more oil - given current constraints and the lack of new, impressive discoveries.

I would definitely like everyone to chime in.

Best,

Henry



[[/img]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary
Author Peak Oil? Replies
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16445
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A new page in exploration--in our own backyards:

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-oil11apr11,0,6514396.story
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11260
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 1:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

McCain now adding his voice in urging the Administration to stop adding to the SPR:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120786930632206383.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Quote:
WASHINGTON -- Sen. John McCain broke with President Bush on how to manage the nation's emergency stockpile of petroleum, saying the administration should stop adding oil to the reserve at a time of high prices.


With oil prices exceeding $100 a barrel and "an adequate supply" in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, he said, "it is time to suspend purchases." Doing so, he added, would lessen world-wide demand for oil and possibly bring down the price of oil.

Sen. McCain, who was speaking in Brooklyn, N.Y. Thursday, also urged Americans to "consider how you can sacrifice a bit for the common good and cut back where you can on your energy use," though he didn't say how.

The comments by the Republican Party's likely presidential nominee highlight the anxiety that high gas prices are causing for some Republicans facing election in November.

In recent months, a number of Republicans have begun to question the administration's policy of adding to the nation's stockpile. Until yesterday only one Republican senator -- Maine's Susan Collins -- had joined Democrats in publicly prodding Mr. Bush to halt the practice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16445
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 10:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks like early quarter buying starting to fade under supply.

Saudis have rejected antagonistic OPEC members for special "cut" meeting this summer. In in the context of weakening endusers this amounts to an increase--without the hair-raising politics.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11260
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

From Briefing.com:

Quote:
The weekly oil inventory report from the Department of Energy indicated that reserves increased 7.3 million barrels. Analysts were expecting a build of 2.3 million barrels.


From the EIA:

Quote:
U.S. commercial crude oil inventories (excluding those in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve) increased by 7.4 million barrels from the previous week. At 319.2 million barrels, U.S. crude oil inventories are in the upper half of the average range for this time of year. Total motor gasoline inventories decreased by 4.5 million barrels last week, and are above the upper limit of the average range. Both finished gasoline inventories and gasoline blending components inventories decreased last week. Distillate fuel inventories decreased by 1.6 million barrels, and are in the lower half of the average range for this time of year. Propane/propylene inventories decreased by 0.5 million barrels last week. Total commercial petroleum inventories increased by 1.5 million barrels last week, and are in the upper half of the average range for this time of year.

Total products supplied over the last four-week period has averaged nearly 20.3 million barrels per day, down by 1.3 percent compared to the similar period last year. Over the last four weeks, motor gasoline demand has averaged about 9.2 million barrels per day, unchanged from the same period last year. Distillate fuel demand has averaged 4.2 million barrels per day over the last four weeks, down 3.1 percent compared to the same period last year. Jet fuel demand is 3.7 percent higher over the last four weeks compared to the same four-week period last year.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11260
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

More calls for Bush to release oil from the SPR:

http://www.bizjournals.com/pacific/stories/2008/03/31/daily5.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11260
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 9:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Truckers continue to take it on the chin. Rumors now flying of a trucking strike (by independent truckers) across the country:

http://www.myfoxcolorado.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=6187491&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=3.2.1
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16445
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 9:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Weekly COT data show oil market has lost around 48% of the non-commercial net long positions.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16445
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Exploring another "peak," japan's consumption down two-years in a row--providing slack for china's rising thirst:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601101&sid=a7WM_kEEWvCM&refer=japan
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16445
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oil Movements said on Thursday that westbound OPEC oil in the Atlantic basin is at a 3-year high. It said that the Atlantic basin oil will hit U.S. shores in April & early-May. While it’s still a bit early to see that oil, it suggests that if prices stage any kind of rally in late-Mar/early-Apr, the rally may have difficulty advancing above the $110.35 all-time high.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16445
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's the chinese and their coal trains trying to feed the added grid capacity (equivilient of France just last year) that have pushed diesel beyond the pale. This will definitely crimp european plans to introduce the "new-diesel" here.

Hard to think of what kind of war it would take in the modern context to move prices the way they've been moved here.

check greasel.com
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11260
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trucking industry now screaming for Bush to tap the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Note that diesel prices over here are now as high as $4.50 a gallon in parts of Beverly Hills, West LA, and Santa Monica.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Truckers Ask Bush to Tap Oil Reserves
Monday March 24, 4:27 pm ET
Trucking Trade Group Urges Bush to Tap Nation's Oil Reserves to Stop Rising Diesel Prices


WASHINGTON (AP) -- With diesel prices at record highs, the trucking industry's main trade group on Monday urged President Bush to release oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

In a letter to the White House, American Trucking Associations President and Chief Executive Bill Graves said surging diesel prices, which on Saturday hit nearly $4.04 a gallon, "will greatly magnify our current economic slowdown and delay our economic recovery."

The ATA, whose members include United Parcel Service Inc. and Knight Transportation Inc., last week said the nation's 3.5 million truck drivers are on pace to spend a record $135 billion on diesel fuel this year, up $22 billion from 2007. Graves said it now costs drivers more than $1,000 to fill a typical tractor-trailer.

But Bush already rejected similar release request from some in Congress. Late last year, the Reserve contained 694 million barrels of oil and has a capacity of more than 720 million barrels. The White House has repeatedly said the reserve is to be used only to counter a severe disruption in supply, not in reaction to prices.

Diesel fuel dipped nearly a penny overnight to about $4.03 a gallon Monday, according to AAA and the Oil Price Information Service. Meanwhile, light, sweet crude for May delivery fell 98 cents to settle at $100.86 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

Trucks haul 70 percent of all freight and rising fuel costs could raise the cost of their cargo, including food, retail and manufactured goods, according to the ATA.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16445
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bounced off the old highs at 98 and half. Fed Ex earnings showed consecutive declines in jetfuel usage.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nodoodahs
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 2408

PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dealbreaker notes rumors of additional margin increases for non-comm traders. FYI.
_________________
I haven’t seen a beatin’ like that since somebody stuck a banana in my pants and turned a monkey loose.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16445
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 9:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm one of the nannies calling for $80 oil before the selloff but here's the Madman with a differnent view. Whatever your view you gotta accept the detail:

Quote:
National Oilwell Varco (NOV - commentary - Cramer's Take) is down huge despite the fact that its order books are filled for years and years, as are Transocean's (RIG - commentary - Cramer's Take) books for that matter.

But then again, Transocean is nowhere near as low as it fell in the January clocking, to the teens. I like National Oilwell Varco because it has taken out its January low, one of the few quality names of the group that has actually taken out its January low.

I think that people have to recognize the levers here: every time we have two down days, oil traders go nuts and panic and you begin to hear talk of $80-a-barrel oil. Then no one buys them. No one at all.

Then you get the gang tackle from the oil service exchange-traded funds and the put-buying and call-selling in the Oil Service HOLDRs Trust (OIH - commentary - Cramer's Take) to try to take that thing down -- maybe to $165, which is where the puts seem to indicate -- and you get unnatural pressure that freaks people out and makes them think it must be over. Put in a little deleveraging -- hedge funds having to reduce margin and sell everything that's not nailed down -- and you get another nail in the alleged coffin.

And then you get some stability, the stocks charge up and everyone buys 'em higher.

The speeding train problem.

I remain committed to my $125 oil target. I am not shifting it because the "stocks" are indicating lower. The stocks haven't indicated much at all other than which hedge fund has charged in last.

That's no way to invest.

_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16445
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right here in the heart of the matter where conventional responses should be seen by now, proof how much of this madness is a financial phenomenon:


Oil price fails to spark merger activity

By Ed Crooks in London

Published: March 12 2008 02:00 | Last updated: March 12 2008 02:00

The soaring oil price did little to stimulate mergers and acquisitions activity in the oil and gas industry last year, according to the leading study of deals in the sector, published today.

The survey from John S. Herold, a research firm, and Standard Chartered, a bank, also found that the prices paid for oil and gas reserves were little changed from 2006 levels, even though oil on the commodities markets rose 55 per cent during the year.

Oil continued its ascent yesterday, reaching a record $109.72 a barrel, although it fell back later.

The global value of oil and gas M&A, including corporate and asset deals, was $154bn last year, down slightly from 2006, with a 40 per cent rise in asset deals offsetting a decline in corporate activity.

The average price paid for oil and gas in proved and probable reserves also declined slightly, to $4.67 a barrel equivalent from $5.18 in 2006.

Rodney Schmidt of Standard Chartered said: "While the commodity was going to $100 a barrel, costs were rising and the government take was rising, and people have factored that into deal values."

Costs in the upstream oil and gas industry have almost doubled since 2005, according to IHS, the consultancy that owns John S. Herold.

The biggest buyer last year was Rosneft, the state-controlled Russian oil company, which spent $22bn in the auction of assets formerly owned by the collapsed oil group Yukos.

The most active western buyer in 2007 was Eni, which spent $13bn.

Sovereign wealth funds and national oil companies accounted for a smaller share of activity than in 2006, with Chinese buyers disappearing, although Herold said it expected that absence from the market to be only temporary.

Middle-eastern buyers were much more active than in 2006, led by Taqa of Abu Dhabi, which bought PrimeWest Energy Trust in Canada for $5.1bn.

Towards the end of the year, the credit squeeze might have started to affect M&A activity, according to Andrew Bartlett, Standard Chartered's global head of oil & gas corporate advisory.

"If you are a super-major looking to finance a $10bn project, it will affect you much less than it would an Aim-listed exploration company," he said.

"But even if a company is in effect AAA rated, it is going to find finance a touch more expensive and a touch more difficult to raise than a year ago."
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Please log in to view without the ad banners
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 25, 26, 27 ... 30, 31, 32  Next
Page 26 of 32

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB