 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Prudent Bear Fund (BEARX) |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11742 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 12:43 pm Post subject: Prudent Bear Fund (BEARX) |
|
|
Down 4.07% for August after rising 6.23% during July - which was its best month since December 2002.
http://quicktake.morningstar.com/FundNet/TotalReturns.aspx?Country=USA&Symbol=BEARX&fdtab=returns
This is arguably the best fund in the Morningstar bear fund category, as the stats suggest (see the link above).
Also, on an upside/downside capture basis:
From January 1996 to June 2007:
* The fund had 63 up months vs. 75 down months, while the S&P 500 had 89 up months vs. 49 down months.
* The average upside monthly return was 5.28% vs. an average downside monthly return of -4.29%. On the other hand, the S&P 500 had an average upside monthly return of 3.36%, vs. a downside monthly return of -3.62%.
* Using the S&P 500 as a benchmark, the upside capture was -67.1%, while its downside capture was -259.3%. In a nutshell, that means, on average, when the S&P 500 is up by 1%, the fund loses 0.671%, but that when the S&P 500 declines by 1%, the fund usually rises by 2.593%.
From July 2002 to June 2007 (or over the last five years):
* The fund had 31 up months vs. 29 down months, while the S&P 500 had 43 up months vs. 17 down months.
* The average upside monthly return was 2.40% vs. an average downside monthly return of -2.60%. On the other hand, the S&P 500 had an average upside monthly return of 2.46%, vs. a downside monthly return of -3.02%.
* Using the S&P 500 as a benchmark, the upside capture was -39.3%, while its downside capture was -123.9%. In a nutshell, that means, on average, when the S&P 500 is up by 1%, the fund loses 0.393%, but that when the S&P 500 declines by 1%, the fund usually rises by 1.239%.
Note that the above post should not be construed as a recommendation to invest in the fund. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Author |
Prudent Bear Fund (BEARX) Replies |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11742 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Given both the long and short positions that the fund holds, however, a better comparison would be to use the Russell 2000 value index as a benchmark.
From July 2002 to June 2007 (or over the last five years):
* The fund had 31 up months vs. 29 down months, while the Russell 2000 Value had 39 up months vs. 21 down months.
* The average upside monthly return was 2.40% vs. an average downside monthly return of -2.60%. On the other hand, the Russell 2000 Value had an average upside monthly return of 3.70%, vs. a downside monthly return of -3.32%.
* Using the Russell 2000 Value as a benchmark, the upside capture was -29.4%, while its downside capture was -101.8%. In a nutshell, that means, on average, when the Russell 2000 Value is up by 1%, the fund loses 0.294%, but that when the Russell 2000 Value declines by 1%, the fund usually rises by 1.018%.
Note that the above numbers for BEARX are all on an after-fee basis.
However, there is a 1% redemption charge if the fund was held for less than 30 days. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Please log in to view without the ad banners |
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB
|