 |
|
| Author |
Sears (SHLD) Replies |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11742 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've been tardy in my reading - I've only just had a chance to read Eddie Lampert's February 28th letter to shareholders:
http://www.searsholdings.com/invest/
This is the part I liked best, especially in the general deleveraging environment I am looking for over the next 12 to 24 months:
| Quote: | Uses of cash
Over the last three years, we have spent a total of $4.3 billion on share repurchases. We have repurchased 33 million shares at an average cost of $132 per share. With this buyback activity, we have reduced our shares outstanding by 20%. For those investors who have sold their shares, we have helped provide liquidity to exit their investment. For those investors who have held onto their shares, they get to participate to a greater extent in the company’s future performance.
Debt reduction has been another area of significant focus for us over the last three years. We have reduced our total obligations by more than $3 billion, in the following two ways. First, we have repaid $1.8 billion of our debt. Our debt balance is currently only $2.3 billion ($3.0 billion with capital leases) – which is quite modest for a company of our size and with our earnings. This number includes the debt of Sears Canada and Orchard Supply Hardware. Excluding this subsidiary debt leaves a remaining balance of $1.6 billion.
Second, we have focused on reducing our pension and other retirement benefit obligations (as noted above, this is similar to debt). Over the past three years we have reduced this obligation by $1.3 billion, cutting our retirement benefit liabilities in half from their balance of $2.6 billion at the time of the merger. This reduction is mostly due to the $800 million we have contributed to pension plans, but the payments we have made for other legacy retiree benefits (like medical coverage and life insurance) and the investment returns generated by our pension assets have also contributed to the reduction in the liability.
In contrast to the attention that our share repurchases have received, it is generally not well understood or appreciated how much we have reduced our debt and pension obligations. Our decision to reduce debt stands in contrast to the practice of some other retail companies that have increased their debt levels significantly in recent years.
In addition to share repurchases and debt reduction, we have also invested in our business over this period, as we have devoted $1.7 billion to capital expenditures. The total investment in our business is $2.0 billion if you include the $300 million we deployed last year to increase our ownership in Sears Canada. We have remodeled hundreds of stores during that time and have invested significantly in new technology platforms and information systems to enhance our online, supply chain and merchandising capabilities.
As a public company we are always focused on shareholder returns. However, as you can see, we simultaneously reduced our obligations and invested in our businesses over this time period. As a result of these actions, we enter 2008 fortunate to have a strong balance sheet. This, accompanied by cash flow generation, can be a very powerful combination, especially in difficult economic times. Among other things, it provides the capacity to pursue opportunities which may become available due to the environment. At the end of the day, our goal is to create value by generating cash and using that cash wisely, not simply to accumulate cash. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 16939 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
He put the lotto in Sears.
I think this should be bought somewhere in this downturn: here in California they've basically become the hispanic go-to place. That's only getting bigger (Marque dos por ingles). And then their tools carry on with the mechanic trade--high margins. And "whitegoods" for the 50 and over crowd. Their online presence with store pickup works well (their catalogue really was the internet's first iteration) and as more and more online dealers get taxed (look for this to increase with state finances what they are).
And then there's their real estate holdings. If McDonnell can get this why not sears? _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11742 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Eddie Lampert has been the favorite "whipping boy" over the last few weeks. Following is courtesy of the WSJ:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lampert Admits Flubs, Sees Sears Turnaround
Chairman Says Repairing the Retailer
Will Take Longer Than Expected
By GARY MCWILLIAMS and GREGORY ZUCKERMAN
January 30, 2008; Page B1
There are no elixirs for corporate turnarounds, says Edward S. Lampert, chairman of Sears Holdings Corp., who acknowledged in an interview yesterday that he should have moved faster to revamp the troubled retailer.
The 45-year-old hedge-fund billionaire made clear his disappointment at misreading the economy last year and says Sears will address the company's latest financial swoon.
On Monday, Aylwin B. Lewis, CEO of Sears Holdings for less than 2˝ years, was ousted, and a search began for a manager to lead a business restructured into a five-unit holding company. Mr. Lampert, who has much of his own wealth tied up with Sears through his investment firm and has been accused of micromanaging the company, also announced that parts of the business will no longer report to him.
Speaking by phone from the company's Hoffman Estates, Ill., headquarters, Mr. Lampert bristled at critics who lost faith in Sears as its share price fell from $195 in April 2007 to about $104 now. Sears Holdings was formed in 2005 when Kmart Corp. merged with Sears, Roebuck & Co. and took the Sears name. The stock's performance since Kmart emerged from bankruptcy in May 2003 is a healthy 900% gain. "Instead of [the share price] being up 20 times since we took control of Kmart in 2003, it's up 10 times. The decline from our highs is in line with other department-store retailers."
He complains that Wall Street analysts have swung between two extremes, from praising the company a few months ago to savaging it now. Analysts have said Mr. Lampert has invested too little in upkeep of stores and that he hasn't made the major changes required to turn around the company. In the past three quarters, profits at the retailer have declined on a year-to-year basis despite new marketing, online and sales initiatives.
"What we're trying to do is not for the faint of heart," Mr. Lampert says. "This is a big challenge. We're trying to build a great company." He says he understands investors' doubts about turning the business around, because both Sears and Kmart have struggled for years to increase sales. But the criticism hurts efforts to keep existing employees and attract new ones, he says.
Critics have recently likened Mr. Lampert's efforts to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. To this, he responds, "I'm OK with whatever the criticism is, but I need to make people understand there is a way forward."
Mr. Lampert is dealing with heavy personal losses from Sears's recent stumbles. He's told investors in his ESL Investments Inc. that virtually his entire net wealth is tied up in the hedge fund, except for personal real estate.
He concedes the five-year turnaround he envisioned at Sears three years ago will take longer than that to achieve. But he says he's never been interested in swapping long-term profit for short-term gains. He believes his new plan can reinvigorate the 121-year-old retailer in a way not otherwise possible.
The past two years have taught him it wasn't enough to put good managers in a structure that didn't work. "I used to think getting all those people in a room was enough. We got collaboration, but at the end of the day, there was no one who owned the decision. That's what we're trying to drive here," he says.
The new design, he says, will allow managers running individual businesses to make their own choices rather than relying on corporate bosses. "In a large company, the structure is very, very important. That's the thing, I feel, we haven't been able to get right," he says.
The restructuring won't happen overnight. There will be conflicts between managers over decisions on whether to sell real estate or divest themselves of brands that invariably will need to be resolved by the new holding-company CEO. But he sees such disagreements as no different than those dealt with by any CEO overseeing a portfolio of businesses.
Other large, complex businesses have successfully adopted the business-portfolio model. He compares Sears with Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc., in which managers are given a long leash to run businesses, and Mr. Buffett doesn't get involved in their day-to-day operations. He also says Sears can be rebuilt with a strong management culture, similar to General Electric Co., and Procter & Gamble Inc.
Mr. Lampert described the company's next CEO as a "mission-driven" leader who feels comfortable balancing multiple interests. "I want someone who will be able to deal well with complexity, who will be able to make decisions under conditions of uncertainty, and is someone people will want to step up and work for."
He pointedly says he's not looking to give up his chairman's title.
Mr. Lampert has often stressed that he doesn't focus on same-store sales performance as others do in the retail business, arguing that profits are much more important than sales. As such, he has pushed Sears to focus on more profitable sales. But he acknowledges that recent results have been disappointing.
"We were on the path to achieving 10% Ebitda [earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization] to sales," he says, referring to a metric comparing how much cash profit comes from each sale. "As, you can see from our recent results, we've fallen off that path and we need to get back there."
He wants to see more "transformational" ideas, which can be as simple as "better assortments, better marketing, better presentation. ... We've been at it awhile but it takes awhile," he says.
Mr. Lampert says he isn't worried about backlash from unhappy investors in his hedge fund, whom he will meet with next month.
He wouldn't comment on ESL's performance.
Mr. Lampert has never disclosed many details about his strategy to investors in ESL. For years, that didn't matter because Mr. Lampert turned in outsize performance at the fund.
But last year, ESL lost more than 25%. He raised even more money from investors, including Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and wealthy clients of the firm, last summer -- right before tumbles in shares of Sears and other ESL holdings, such as AutoZone Inc., the auto-parts retailer, and banking giant Citigroup Inc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11742 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Barron's on SHLD:
| Quote: | SEARS HOLDINGS GOT SMOKED THURSDAY, falling more than 10%, to around $104, after the retailer disclosed a shockingly bad third quarter.
Earnings fell 99%, from $1.27 a share a year earlier to just a penny. Sales at stores open at least a year sank 4.2%. Gross margins, or what Sears (ticker: SHLD) and Kmart earn before figuring in general administrative and sales costs, also sank far more than analysts anticipated. Obviously, Sears had to indulge in heavy discounting just to clear its floors. And yet inventories still grew 4.5%. Hedge-fund manager Eddie Lampert, whose ESL owns more than 45% of Sears, saw the company's selling expenses rise relative to sales, despite extensive cost-cutting.
In an Oct. 22 article entitled "A Storied Name on Sale?", we argued that the stock, then around 134, was cheap in relation to Sears' net asset value, mostly its real estate and valuable brands like Kenmore and Craftsman. Yet we warned that it might be a long slog before these values were monetized, since Lampert seems bent on using Sears' cash flow to buy in its stock.
Deutsche Bank analyst William Dreher apparently agrees with our thesis, though he has cut his 12-month price target on the stock from $182 to $161, which more closely approximates his $150-a-share estimate of Sears' net asset value. We think that number is conservative. Lampert, now caught in what Dreher calls the current "Bermuda Triangle of retailing," may speed up his restructuring plans. If successful in his offer last Monday for Restoration Hardware (RSTO), he'd have an excellent potential tenant for some of Sears' mall space.
In the meantime, at least one hedge fund we contacted said it is backing up the truck to buy more Sears shares. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Please log in to view without the ad banners |
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB
|