 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
DEADShort term sentimentsDEAD |
vin Senior Poster

Joined: 06 Jul 2006 Posts: 82 Location: Buenos Aires
|
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 8:35 pm Post subject: DEADShort term sentimentsDEAD |
|
|
New here – mostly swing trading. I’ve been searching for a serious site and believe I have found it here. Mr. To’s commentaries are excellent. Let’s cut to it - I for one am spooked short term (1-3 weeks). Here are my reasons:
First, the current rally just doesn’t seem to have teeth. The move up on June 29 seemed exaggerated. It was just a big ‘Hurrah, the Fed did what we expected.’ Many read a future pause into Bernanke’s statement but who knows? It’s almost as if the market ‘willed’ a rally.
Second, after this delayed follow through day the major indexes responded with a pullback on increased volume (modest in percentage loss).
Third, two days prior (June 27th) all three indices had what I call a ‘heave day.’ They climbed over the previous day’s high only to close lower than the previous day’s low – all on increased volume.
Fourth, there was no doubt some end of the quarter window dressing and short covering.
What has happened since? Some call it consolidation; I call it distribution and selling into bounces. The accumulation volume has been anemic. Although the holiday week clouds things the leading events remain.
Lastly, the most important thing is the gut. Something makes me feel very uneasy (see below). Maybe it was the synthesis of what I mentioned above; maybe I am worried about locking in gains on this recent move up. Nevertheless, I liquidated everything except LEN as I don’t think homebuilders can get beat up much more (gee, wonder where I got that idea?).
North Korea lobbing missiles into the sea doesn’t help. I think there will be one more shakeout before we test old highs again. I don’t know if we’ll sink to (or below) the mid-June lows, but it could be painful. Predictions are pretty much worthless until events transpire. I’m only building an arguable case. The market doesn’t care or need reasons to steamroll every naysayer out there. Let the tape decide.
Side note: I was reading my Bible before the market opened and came across these verses:
“With her enticing speech she caused him to yield, with her flattering lips she seduced him. Immediately he went after her, as an ox goes to the slaughter, or as a fool to the correction of the stocks…” Proverbs 7:21-22
I don’t claim to have divine intervention on my side, and starting my day with this verse might have been what spooked me. Take it for what it’s worth, but the wording in this verse is uncanny in its application to bulls running up a blind (r)alley. The Bible remains the best book on investing ever written (not to mention the invaluable spiritual content). If you don’t have one, get one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Author |
DEADShort term sentimentsDEAD Replies |
dash Veteran Poster

Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 473
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
diesel Moderator


Joined: 05 Oct 2006 Posts: 412 Location: Australia & New Zealand
|
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
The last time we had a confirmed hindenburg omen was last year before the March to August rout in the stock market.
For the record dash I arent expecting the big top in the USA stock market just yet. All i'm looking for is a correction to clear out some of the leverage etc which is necessary for a healthy bull market IMO. For the record I think we are a few years out from the big top yet.
I will be more than willing to eat my humble pie in a few months if your stock investments beat out my risk free rate of return of 5%.
Cheerio. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dash Veteran Poster

Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 473
|
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Of interest as well is that a Hindenburg omen was generated on Wednesday. |
There were lots of articles on safehaven about the last one which was generated before a major rally sometime last year. It seems completely bogus to me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7688 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No one has a good explanation for us but I think breadth data - especially when looking at daily data - is looking less reliable as an overbought/oversold indicator.
One reason may be because of the small and mid cap bull market we have seen over the last few years. Coupled with a huge cyclical boom where nearly all stocks have gone up, I am not surprised that the correlation of individual stocks to the major indices have gone up in recent years. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
diesel Moderator


Joined: 05 Oct 2006 Posts: 412 Location: Australia & New Zealand
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here you go straight from Wikipedia.
| Quote: |
The Hindenburg Omen is a technical analysis signal that attempts to predict a forthcoming stock market crash. It is named after the Hindenburg disaster, the crash of the German zeppelin of the same name in May 1937.
The Hindenburg Omen is the alignment of several technical factors that measure the underlying condition of the stock market - specifically the NYSE - such that the probability that a stock market crash occurs is higher than normal, and the probability of a severe decline is quite high. The rationale behind the indicator is that, under normal conditions, either a substantial number of stocks establish new annual highs or a large number set new lows - but not both. When both new highs and new lows are large, it indicates the stock market is undergoing a period of extreme divergence. Such divergence is not usually conducive to future rising prices. A healthy market requires some degree of internal uniformity, whether the direction of that uniformity is up or down.
Criteria
The traditional definition of a Hindenburg Omen has five criteria:
1. That the daily number of NYSE new 52 Week Highs and the daily number of new 52 Week Lows must both be greater than 2.2 percent of total NYSE issues traded that day.
2. That the smaller of these numbers is greater than 79.
3. That the NYSE 10 Week moving average is rising.
4. That the McClellan Oscillator is negative on that same day.
5. That new 52 Week Highs cannot be more than twice the new 52 Week Lows (however it is ok for new 52 Week Lows to be more than double new 52 Week Highs). This condition is absolutely mandatory.
These measures are calculated each evening using Wall Street Journal figures for consistency.
The occurrence of all five criteria on one day is often referred to as an unconfirmed Hindenburg Omen.
A confirmed Hindenburg Omen occurs if a second (or more) Hindenburg Omen signals occur during a 36-day period from the first signal.
Conclusions
The probability of a move greater than 5% to the downside after a confirmed Hindenburg Omen within the next 41 days after its occurrence is 77%, the probability of a panic sellout is 41% and the probability of a real big stock market crash is 25%.
The occurrence of a confirmed Hindenburg Omen does not necessarily mean that the stock market will go down. On the other hand there has never been a significant stock market decline in history, that was not preceded by a confirmed Hindenburg Omen.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 7645 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Hindenberg Omen," I like the sound of that. What is it??? _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
diesel Moderator


Joined: 05 Oct 2006 Posts: 412 Location: Australia & New Zealand
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Of interest as well is that a Hindenburg omen was generated on Wednesday. These technical indications are usually seen at significant tops. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dash Veteran Poster

Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 473
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks diesel for the analysis. The market does seem to be putting in a number of quite extreme readings recently. I've been focussing more on beadth (TRIN in March, and A/D these last 10 trading days), so it's interesting to hear how the recent rise in interest rates could affect things.
I suspect we haven't properly retested the recent low yet, and whether we bounce or break down further is still the key event I'm going to be taking my cue from.
Here's another unusual breadth factoid from sentimentrader:
| Quote: | Anyway, another unusual occurrence is that yesterday more than 80% of stocks on the NYSE closed in negative territory, while today more than 80% of stocks closed in positive territory. This is such a quick reversal, and of such magnitude, that we've seen similar situations only four times in the past four decades.
Those four occurrences were 6/6/67, 3/28/80, 4/5/94 and 3/6/07. After each of them, prices came back down again to test the lows, and those tests were successful. A month later, the S&P 500 was positive every time by an average of +2.6%, and three months later the average return had climbed to +7.2%. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
diesel Moderator


Joined: 05 Oct 2006 Posts: 412 Location: Australia & New Zealand
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK, but then lets looks at things from a yield perspective.
Since 1984, there have been three times the yield on the 10 year has exceeded the 100 month average closing price. The first time was Oct 94 when the S&P was at 472. It fell to 444 within days.
The second time was December 99, the S&P was at 1470 and hit 1366 within 30 days.
The third time was April 06 when the S&P was at 1310 and hit 1220 within 30 days.
We have now started our fourth attempt. The S&P was at 1531 on May 31. Using the average decline, we should be looking for a print at 1430 in the near future.
One last observation. This is the first time the 10 year has closed above the 100 month average yield without yields already being more than 2 standard deviations, 5 month over 20 month. We are less than .2 SD's.
Also, this is the first time the S&P has closed more than 3 SD's 5/20 month and the 10 year yield been above the 100 month average price.
There has not been a time where the 10 closed above its 100 month average where the S&P did not get back to the 10 month average price, which is at 1411 as of 5/31. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dash Veteran Poster

Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 473
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Impressive bounce today. Probably too soon to say this was a successful retest of the low, but the odds must have increased of it being so.
Breadth heavily skewed in favour of advancing issues, with another >1000 day today. Historically, clusters of extreme breadth readings have been following by higher prices. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 7645 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like we've got something for everyone. It must be options expiration week.
Swap spreads matching 2003 bear market highs...without the corresponding volitility. _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lion hunter Senior Poster

Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 108
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Increasing new lows is not a positive imo.
Im always on the lookout for divergences.
Im short until proven otherwise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7688 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes, the intraday reversal today was probably key. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 7645 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
129 after rally to unchanged.....I think we're on our way. Diesel??? _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dash Veteran Poster

Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 473
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
New Highs - New Lows below 20 again today. Breadth has been consistently negative recently. An interesting stat from sentimentrader: this is the first time since July 2006 that for 5 out of the last 6 days breadth has been higher (ie more negative) than -1000 on the SPX.
Seems to me like we're going to retest Thursday's low and that we're also at a key juncture: if all is well, we should put in an intermediate-term bottom around these levels. A failure to bounce would signal trouble IMO. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Please log in to view without the ad banners |
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB
|