 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Supercomputing Updates at IBM |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11742 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 8:58 pm Post subject: Supercomputing Updates at IBM |
|
|
IBM just awarded a contract (along with Cray) by DARPA to develop a 10 petaflop computer.
-------------------------------------------------
Do the Math: IBM Wins
By Jack Uldrich
November 22, 2006
Sometimes my head hurts. It hurts from trying to keep up with the advances in supercomputing. More specifically, it hurts from trying to comprehend how these behemoths will change the business landscape in the near future.
Earlier this year, I noted that IBM (NYSE: IBM) was working with Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) to develop a supercomputer capable of 70 trillion calculations per second. At the time, I mused that it would take a person using a handheld calculator 60 million years to perform what this machine could do in a second. Then, this summer, Big Blue announced that it was working with the National Nuclear Security Administration to install a supercomputer capable of 1 quadrillion (1,000 trillion) calculations per second.
And now, just yesterday, the U.S. government's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) revealed it had awarded $244 million to IBM and another $250 million to Cray (Nasdaq: CRAY) to design a new generation of supercomputers. This next generation would be 100 times more powerful than today's supercomputers, but simpler to program and easier to use. (The loser in the competition was Sun Microsystems (Nasdaq: SUNW), which was not awarded a contract).
If all goes according to plan, one or both of these companies will have a supercomputer churning out a brain-rattling 10 quadrillion operations per second by 2010. This is 10 petaflops in geek-speak, or if you prefer to use my hand-calculator time analogy, it would take you a mere 8 billion years to do what these computers will be able to do in one second.
I am convinced that IBM is going to be the best blue chip of 2007, but not just because it is a leader in the development and creation of supercomputers. Rather, it is because I believe that IBM's Global Consulting business, working in conjunction with its Center for Business Optimization (whose small staff specializes in applying advanced mathematics to business problems), will be able to first help businesses harness the power of these powerful computers to crunch data and then translate that data into meaningful -- and profitable -- insights.
For example, IBM's Center for Business Optimization recently helped a company that had more than 70,000 SKUs (stock keeping units) with an inventory problem. Normally, finding the best way to manage this number of products would have taken six hours. With a supercomputer, it took 17 seconds.
What this implies in more practical terms is that the company, instead of waiting overnight for results, now gets them immediately. More importantly, because the results are available immediately, the company can now insert different variables into the program to find an even better way to optimize its inventory.
Supercomputers' potential, however, far transcends inventory management. I remain convinced that these machines will also lead to startling scientific breakthroughs in medicine, material science, and nanotechnology. And because IBM is positioned at the confluence of how these findings might be used by business, it will also be able to generate substantial revenue for its consulting businesses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Author |
Supercomputing Updates at IBM Replies |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11742 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11742 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11742 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11742 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11742 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11742 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IBM: Envisioning the world's fastest supercomputer
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10410044-92.html
| Quote: | IBM will release a radical new chip next year that will go into a University of Illinois supercomputer in a quest to build what may become the world's fastest supercomputer.
That university's supercomputer center is a storied place, home to both famous fictional and real supercomputers. The notorious HAL 9000 sentient supercomputer in "2001: A Space Odyssey" was built in Urbana, Illinois, presumably on the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign campus.
Though not aspiring to artificial intelligence, the IBM Blue Waters project supercomputer, like the HAL 9000 series, will be able to do massively complex calculations in an instant and, like HAL, be built in Urbana-Champaign. It is being housed in a special building on the Urbana-Champaign campus specifically for the computer that will theoretically be capable of achieving 10 petaflops, about 10 times as fast as the fastest supercomputer today. (A petaflop is 1 quadrillion floating point operations per second, a key indicator of supercomputer performance.) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mtvk Veteran Poster

Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Posts: 242
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thinking of the electrical power needed, probably we need a mega
nuclear reactor
We may need a district worth of computing and personnel. Support
personal will be all over the globe I guess.
To house the computer and all personnel we need a district or a small
IBM country
Just imagination. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 11742 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 2:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thomas Watson once said that the world only needed five computers. Apparently, he was wrong. The world only needs one:
http://www.dailytech.com/IBM+Proposes+One+Computer+to+Run+Entire+Internet/article10612c.htm
| Quote: | IBM launched an Epic project with an almost unfathomable goal -- to develop a single supercomputer capable of running the entire internet as a web application. The project, codenamed Kittyhawk (detailed in a white paper by IBM) created quite the stir in internet technology community.
While the software details descend quickly into the realm of the cerebral, one number that jumps off the page is the estimate for the number of cores and memory for the finished proposed system -- 67.1 million cores with 32PB of memory.
The system is based on IBM's Blue Gene/P architecture, which takes millions of cores and arranges them in a hierarchal architecture. At the lowest level four 850 MHz Power PC cores run on a single chip, with built in memory controllers and interconnects. The next level up is the card, which contains 32 of these quad core chips known as "nodes." Up a level, 16 cards compose a midplane. A server rack has two midplanes, yielding a total of 1024 nodes, or 4096 processors. Each server rack has 2TB of memory to play with. A maximum of 16,384 racks can be networked to yield the finally staggering metrics. As each rack has an I/O bandwidth of 640Gb/s, a "full" 67.1m core system would sport 10.4Pb/s of bandwidth. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Please log in to view without the ad banners |
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB
|