MarketThoughts.com Home Page
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  StatisticsStatistics   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Technology Review on Solar Energy
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Technology Review on Solar Energy
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11742
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:14 am    Post subject: Technology Review on Solar Energy Reply with quote

Assembly line should be ready by sometime next year:

Quote:
Much more efficient solar cells may soon be possible as a result of technology that more efficiently captures and uses light. StarSolar, a startup based in Cambridge, MA, aims to capture and use photons that ordinarily pass through solar cells without generating electricity. The company, which is licensing technology developed at MIT, claims that its designs could make it possible to cut the cost of solar cells in half while maintaining high efficiency. This would make solar power about as cheap as electricity from the electric grid.


Story here: http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/18415/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary
Author Technology Review on Solar Energy Replies
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11742
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 1:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scientific American on the potential of solar - but concludes that subsidies are needed from now till 2020 in order to develop the infrastructure:

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-solar-grand-plan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16939
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 4:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's so concentrated on state subsidy with grid parity some 300% efficiencies away--and the the biggest "market," stepping back (and simultaneously embracing coal as a political counter to Russia).

Thermal shows the way forward.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11742
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 12:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The solar energy industry in Texas isn't going anywhere nowadays:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/5824209.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11742
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 11:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Google, Chevron, and Goldman continue their efforts on solar energy:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&refer=home&sid=a_TUtlIwV7Fw
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11742
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A different take on what solar could be going forward:

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=9275
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11742
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Google flips on solar installation:

http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/32526/113/

Quote:
The roof mounted cells generate 1.6 megawatts which is enough electricity for about 1000 homes. Google says the solar cells will give about one-third of the campus’ electrical needs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11742
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A 2015 target sounds good to me - but if we have some kind of rolling brownouts or natural gas/coal price spike again over the next few years, then this could come faster than we initially anticipated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11742
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

More latest news on solar energy from Technology Review:

http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/18910/

Quote:
Such high output may be just the beginning. Raed Sherif, director of concentrator products at Spectrolab, says there is every reason to believe that these metamorphic solar cells will top 45 percent and perhaps even 50 percent efficiency. Sherif says those efficiencies, combined with the vast reduction in materials made possible by 1,000-fold concentrators, could rapidly reduce the cost of producing solar power. "Concentrated photovoltaics are a relatively late entry in the field, but it will catch up very quickly in terms of cost," he predicts.

Sherif says that right now his company is focusing commercialization efforts on the older and better-known designs, which currently deliver 35 to 37 percent efficient modules and could improve to 40 percent efficiency within two to three years. But he says the metamorphic approach is more likely to achieve the 45 percent efficiency level the company hopes to hit within six to seven years. Sherif estimates that a 40 percent module would reduce overall cost by about 14 percent if Spectrolab holds at its current $10-per-square-centimeter module price, while a 45 percent cell would trim system costs by an additional 9 to 10 percent.

Boeing anticipates further cost reductions as other components improve or are mass-produced. Under a $29.8 million concentrated-photovoltaic development partnership with the Department of Energy announced this spring, Boeing promises to cut the delivered price of electricity via concentrated solar to 15 cents per kilowatt hour by 2010, from an estimated 32 cents per kilowatt hour today, and to cut that price in half again by 2015. That would make solar power less expensive than electricity from the grid in much of the United States, where the average price of electricity in recent months has been about 10 cents per kilowatt hour.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Please log in to view without the ad banners
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Page 6 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB