The Obama Stimulus

[HenryTo]

Greg Mankiw comments on the Obama stimulus plan:

http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2009/01/obamas-multipliers.html

FYI, any posts that discusses politics or any conjectures without sufficient data backing will be deleted.

[rffrydr]

It was always here but SBA loans are getting some juice. At 10% this will probably be another money-maker for US. We are a long long way from dropping money from a helicopter.



http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-1016-sba-microloans-20101016,0,6343162.story
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!

[HenryTo]

Latest stimulus plan passed. More plans on the way to provide funding to cash-strapped state and local governments:

[diesel]

[rffrydr]

Some call it the Post Office.

--"a cause to hope but not celebrate."
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!

[Ven]

[diesel]

All this talk about stimulus after stimulus is getting old. The US should just get on with it show some leadership and let the deficit float.

After they do that they could offer a job to anyone who applies, at a fixed rate of pay. This would result in full employment, by definition. It would also eliminate the need for such legislation as unemployment compensation and a minimum wage.

The new class of government employees, which we could call supplementary, would function as an automatic stabilizer, the way unemployment currently does. A strong economy with rising labor costs would result in supplementary employees leaving their government jobs, as the private sector lures them with higher wages. (The government must allow this to happen, and not increases wages to compete.) This reduction of government expenditures is a contractionary fiscal bias. If the economy slows, and workers are laid off from the private sector, they will immediately assume supplementary government employment. The resulting increase in government expenditures is an expansionary bias. As long as the government does not change the supplementary wage, it becomes the defining factor for the currency- the price around which free market prices in the private sector evolve.
_________________
All cats are gray in the dark.

[rffrydr]

"Wind Energy Jobs not Blowing Anyone Away"

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-green-jobs2-2010feb02,0,6156904.story


The grid gets in the way....again. Hard to believe we're here now, after where we were then.

Gotta luv the compound lie here:

[rffrydr]

[rffrydr]

Tom Graff
GSE news and market impact
12/29/2009 7:57 AM EST

[rffrydr]

Rural broadband out of the gate:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10417294-38.html
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!

[HenryTo]

The "Jobs for Main Street Act of 2010" a.k.a. "Stimulus II" needs to go through in order to prevent a deeper financial calamity in California:

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/1385600.html

[HenryTo]

The main provisions of the "Jobs for Main Street Act of 2010":
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
House narrowly approves Democratic jobs plan
By ANDREW TAYLOR (AP) – 7 hours ago

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's Democratic allies in the House Wednesday muscled through a year-end plan to create jobs, mixing about $50 billion for public works projects with another almost $50 billion for cash-strapped state and local governments.

The unemployed would get continued benefits. But conspicuously absent from the plan were Obama's recently announced initiatives to give Social Security recipients $250 payments, a tax credit for small businesses that create jobs and a program awarding tax credits to people who make their homes more energy efficient.

Not a single Republican voted for the plan, which passed on a 217-212 vote after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., worked the floor for an hour before it passed. The measure now goes to the Senate, which won't consider the measure until next year and which generally has a smaller appetite for such deficit-financed economic stimulus measures.

Given increasing anxiety among Democrats over massive budget deficits and the party's poor marks with voters for its free-spending ways, the measure could face a tough road. Almost 40 Democrats voted against the plan, mostly moderates and junior members elected from swing districts.

According to documents released by Democrats, the measure would cost $154 billion. But there's also another $20 billion from the federal treasury to keep the highway trust fund afloat.

The measure blends a familiar mix of money for highway, transit and water projects and aid to help communities retain teachers and firefighters. There's also $41 billion for a six-month extension of more generous unemployment benefits and $12 billion to renew health insurance subsidies.

Many of the ideas are renewals of programs started in February's $787 billion economic stimulus bill, which has earned mixed reviews from the public as unemployment has hit 10 percent.

The idea behind the "Jobs for Main Street Act" was to enact fast-acting steps that would quickly boost employment. The bill also reflects concerns among rank-and-file Democrats that the original stimulus measure didn't have enough money for infrastructure projects.

But infrastructure spending is notoriously slow to spend out as projects need to be planned and can require a lengthy contracting process. Most of the so-called shovel ready projects have already been funded.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, less than half of the $39 billion in the measure for transportation and housing projects would be spent over the next decade, with just $1.7 billion being spent through next September.

Democrats claimed $75 billion of the measure is "paid for" with unused money from the Wall St. bailout. Republicans countered that the bill is really financed with red ink since the bailout money would otherwise revert to the Treasury to lower the deficit.

Republicans branded the new bill "Son of Stimulus" and were withering in their assessments.

"More spending, more debt. Same lousy policies that haven't produced jobs all year," said House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio.

Democrats also say that economists largely credit the earlier stimulus measure for the fledgling economic recovery and the improving unemployment picture.

"The situation is worse than we thought and getting better more slowly than we hoped but it's clearly getting better," said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass.

Democrats said that the measure would prevent a double-dip recession by giving state and local governments $23 billion to retain teachers and lesser amounts to keep firefighters and police officers. And it would help prevent tax increases by state governments by giving them $23.5 billion for the Medicaid program for the poor and disabled.

Republicans also distributed a chart showing that roughly half the money goes into accounts brimming with cash from the earlier stimulus bill.

"The agencies are awash with money coming through the pipeline," said Rep. Jerry Lewis, R-Calif.

But Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey, D-Wis., countered that most of the earlier stimulus money has been committed if not actually spent.

The measure also includes money for Amtrak construction, school renovation and job training. There's also $1.1 billion for part-time college jobs, summer employment for low-income teenagers and money for workers in national parks and forests.

The bill also allows very poor people with as little as no income to claim a $1,000-per-child tax credit in what Republicans charged was simply a welfare payment to 16 million poor families.

The bill also would extend federal surface transportation programs through the end of next September.

Democratic leaders had to scramble to find the votes for the measure, which came up right after the House approved a $290 billion increase in the government's ability to borrow. That 218-214 vote reflected unhappiness by moderate Democrats about adding to the nation's red ink.

[rffrydr]

This aspect of the GDP report,...

[rffrydr]

We forget, credit is a two-way street:

http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-Economy/idUSTRE57560Q20090806
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!

[rffrydr]

"Late" infrastructure coming right on time:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124942875620406143.html

And, despite the "shovel-ready" propaganda, as planned.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!