MarketThoughts.com Home Page
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  StatisticsStatistics   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Trouble on the Home Front
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14 ... 16, 17, 18  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Trouble on the Home Front
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11254
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 9:14 am    Post subject: Trouble on the Home Front Reply with quote

FYI:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trouble on the Home Front
By Nicholas Yulico
TheStreet.com Staff Reporter
1/25/2006 9:48 AM EST
URL: http://www.thestreet.com/markets/realestate/10263958.html

Homebuilders Centex (CTX:NYSE) and Ryland (RYL:NYSE) both reported strong quarterly earnings, but their new-order numbers, which will drive future growth, look dismal.

Calabasas, Calif.-based Ryland said its net income rose 49% to $162 million, or $3.32 per share, compared to $108.7 million, or $2.17 per share, a year earlier. The results handily beat the consensus $3.12 estimate on First Call.

But Ryland's unit orders fell 5% year-over-year for its latest quarter. The lackluster performance led A.G. Edwards analyst Greg Gieber to cut his rating on Ryland to sell. He also dropped his 2006 EPS estimate to $10.25 from $10.90. In a research note Wednesday morning, Gieber noted that the only area of strength in Ryland's orders came from Texas, where unit sales were up 27%. However, the average selling price in Texas is 36% below the company's average, with equally low gross margins, he said.

"Using our new 2006 EPS estimate, Ryland currently trades at a 7.3 times multiple. That is a 12% premium to the group's current average 2006 multiple of 6.5 times. We don't believe Ryland warrants any premium to the group," Gieber wrote.

Centex, which reported a 30% increase in its quarterly earnings, reported order growth, but it was weaker than analysts expected.

The Dallas-based builder said its new orders rose 4% to 8,128 homes. Sales were strongest in the Southwest, where orders spiked 28% year over year. On the West Coast, orders rose 10%. But orders fell 15% in the Southeast, 8% in the mid-Atlantic and 3% in the Midwest.

"This is not particularly positive to hit only 4%, though we don't know all the details behind it," says Gieber, who was expecting nearly 11% order growth.

Centex said net income rose to $329.3 million, or $2.49 a share, for its fiscal third quarter ending Dec. 31, up from $253.8 million, or $1.91 a share, a year earlier. Excluding discontinued items, Centex posted earnings of $332.7 million, or $2.52 a share. Analysts expected earnings of $2.48 a share, according to Thomson First Call.

Revenue rose 25% to $3.74 billion, shy of analysts forecast of $3.81 billion.

Centex's earnings growth came amid an 18% increase in home closings, which rose to 9,504 units from 8,047, and a 130-basis-point jump in operating margin.

The weak orders will likely be a focus on both companies' conference calls Wednesday morning. Homebuilder Meritage (MTH:NYSE) will also report earnings today at an unspecified time.

The existing home sales data comes out at 10 a.m. EST from the National Association of Realtors.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary
Author Trouble on the Home Front Replies
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16435
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Again, foreign money stepping up:

http://www.sacbee.com/103/story/646521.html
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16435
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

While we were all looking at the the second and third derivatives of the past the actual market moved on:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/22679136

5.42 ain't bad on a 30year fixed. Master H., whattya think of PMI's rec on Houston? Guess they like the lack of appreciation this last few years. But it's been a builder's extravaganza, no? --city building, not just residential, right?
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16435
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DJ Cleveland Sues 21 Banks Over Foreclosure Crisis
2008-01-11 09:07 (New York)



CLEVELAND (AP)--The city of Cleveland, an epicenter of the U.S.'s home
foreclosure crisis, has sued 21 banks, claiming subprime mortgage lending in
inner-city neighborhoods has created a public nuisance that hurt property
values and city tax collections.
The one-of-a-kind suit, filed in Cuyahoga County, Ohio Common Pleas Court,
accuses venerable institutions such as Deutsche Bank (DB), Goldman Sachs (GS),
Merrill Lynch (MER) and Wells Fargo (WFC) of creating a public nuisance. The
lawsuit seeks to recover hundreds of millions of dollars in damages, including
lost taxes from devalued property and money spent demolishing and boarding up
thousands of abandoned houses.
"To me, this is no different than organized crime or drugs," Mayor Frank
Jackson told The Plain Dealer. He arranged a news conference Friday to detail
the city's legal strategy.
"It has the same effect as drug activity in neighborhoods. It's a form of
organized crime that happens to be legal in many respects," Jackson said.
On Tuesday, Baltimore sued Wells Fargo, alleging the bank intentionally sold
high-interest mortgages more to blacks than to whites in violation of federal
law.
Cleveland based its legal challenge on a state law that relates to public
nuisances.
Jackson and city Law Director Robert Triozzi said Cleveland should have been
excluded from the frenzy of selling mortgage-backed securities to investors.
The practice, known as securitization, became popular during the housing boom
earlier this decade.
The city said Cleveland housing prices remained relatively flat amid
industrial layoffs as real estate values jumped elsewhere. The suit claimed
that even though these issues were well documented, investment bankers pushed
loans to investors at the expense of borrowers.

(END) Dow Jones Newswires
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16435
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

One man's trouble is another....

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ft/20080110/bs_ft/fto011020080347221414
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11254
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Motley Fool on the latest housing statistics:

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2008/01/02/another-dose-of-housing-hogwash.aspx
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16435
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

...And how community comes together. IRA investing takes it up a notch:


http://www.cnbc.com/id/22398678
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16435
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 8:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And the mighty shall become meek: how a community goes down.

http://www.sacbee.com/103/story/593143.html

Pay attention muni investors--yes, china.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16435
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thy neighbor's keeper:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/22398678
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16435
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 8:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's a crime:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/25/us/25fraud.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16435
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

But the prop tax remains:

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071223/taxed_out.html
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16435
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The spillover effect:


http://www.sacbee.com/103/story/586093.html
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11254
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Freddie sees more losses over the next few years. Look for liquidity in the mortgage market to contract significantly over the next few months, as the additional fees and other "cautionary" measures start to kick in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Freddie Sees $5.5B-$12B More Losses
Tuesday December 11, 11:45 am ET
By Marcy Gordon, AP Business Writer
Freddie Mac Chief Says Business Will 'Get Tougher Before It Gets Better' As Defaults Rise

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The chief executive of Freddie Mac estimated Tuesday the mortgage finance company will lose an additional $5.5 billion to $7.5 billion over the next few years as the housing crisis worsens and home-loan defaults rise.

The government-sponsored company has already logged about $4.5 billion in projected losses during the first nine months of this year.

"I honestly think it's going to get tougher before it gets better," Richard Syron, the company's chairman and CEO, said in a discussion with financial analysts in New York.

Freddie's shares fell $1.80, or more than 5 percent, to $33.24 in morning trading.

While the mortgage crisis has brought a rising wave of foreclosure notices into public view, less evident have been "pictures of people standing with furniture on the lawn" after being forcibly evicted from their homes, Syron said. "As that begins to happen, and it will happen, I am afraid of the impact that this has."

Syron's remarks came a day after Freddie Mac and its larger government-sponsored rival Fannie Mae said they are changing their criteria for purchasing delinquent home loans they've guaranteed, in order to reduce the number they buy from investors.

On Tuesday, Freddie Mac announced it was imposing a 0.25 percent fee on all new home loans it buys or guarantees with settlement dates starting March 9, matching an earlier move by Fannie Mae.

The two companies, which together own or guarantee around two-fifths of U.S. home-mortgage debt, have cut their dividends and sold billions of dollars of special stock recently to buttress their finances after posting stunning third-quarter losses. They have been forced to set aside billions of extra dollars to account for bad home loans, eroding their profits at a time when home prices are falling and defaults are spiking on high-risk mortgages made to borrowers with weak credit histories.

Fannie's shares declined $1.85, or 5 percent, to $35.06.


Last edited by HenryTo on Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:14 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11254
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fannie and Freddie adding fuel to the fire, as they quietly add a new 0.25% upfront fee on all new mortgages that it buys or guarantees:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119733436109620199.html?mod=yahoo_hs&ru=yahoo

Quote:
Fannie Mae, the giant government-sponsored mortgage investor, last week raised costs for many borrowers by quietly adding a 0.25% up-front charge on all new mortgages that it buys or guarantees. On a $400,000 mortgage, that would mean an extra $1,000 in fees, almost certain to be passed on to the consumer. Freddie Mac, the other big government-sponsored mortgage investor, is expected to impose a similar fee soon, according to a person familiar with the situation.

The new charge from Fannie Mae adds to the general gloom over the housing market. It comes as mortgage interest rates are heading up again after a recent dip -- as well as increases in mortgage-insurance costs, tougher requirements on down payments and other moves by lenders to ration credit. And last month, Fannie and Freddie imposed surcharges for mortgage borrowers with lower credit scores.

Loan applications have been so slow lately, says Lou Barnes, a mortgage banker in Boulder, Colo., that it feels like "our client base today is limited to people who don't read the newspaper or watch television."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
dknoester
Veteran Poster
Veteran Poster


Joined: 29 Jul 2005
Posts: 164
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 2:05 pm    Post subject: San Frandisco Chronicle on the Mortgage Meltdown Reply with quote

"The ticking time bomb in the U.S. banking system is not resetting subprime mortgage rates. The real problem is the contractual ability of investors in mortgage bonds to require banks to buy back the loans at face value if there was fraud in the origination process."

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/12/09/IN5BTNJ2V.DTL

DK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16435
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Our good friend the Realtors are calling a (data) bottom...again:


http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/pending-home-sales-index-rises/story.aspx?guid=%7BF169379B-F26A-45FA-BC8D-EE2125E78898%7D
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Please log in to view without the ad banners
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14 ... 16, 17, 18  Next
Page 13 of 18

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB