MarketThoughts.com Home Page
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  StatisticsStatistics   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Trouble on the Home Front
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14, 15, 16  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Trouble on the Home Front
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 9319
Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 9:14 am    Post subject: Trouble on the Home Front Reply with quote

FYI:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trouble on the Home Front
By Nicholas Yulico
TheStreet.com Staff Reporter
1/25/2006 9:48 AM EST
URL: http://www.thestreet.com/markets/realestate/10263958.html

Homebuilders Centex (CTX:NYSE) and Ryland (RYL:NYSE) both reported strong quarterly earnings, but their new-order numbers, which will drive future growth, look dismal.

Calabasas, Calif.-based Ryland said its net income rose 49% to $162 million, or $3.32 per share, compared to $108.7 million, or $2.17 per share, a year earlier. The results handily beat the consensus $3.12 estimate on First Call.

But Ryland's unit orders fell 5% year-over-year for its latest quarter. The lackluster performance led A.G. Edwards analyst Greg Gieber to cut his rating on Ryland to sell. He also dropped his 2006 EPS estimate to $10.25 from $10.90. In a research note Wednesday morning, Gieber noted that the only area of strength in Ryland's orders came from Texas, where unit sales were up 27%. However, the average selling price in Texas is 36% below the company's average, with equally low gross margins, he said.

"Using our new 2006 EPS estimate, Ryland currently trades at a 7.3 times multiple. That is a 12% premium to the group's current average 2006 multiple of 6.5 times. We don't believe Ryland warrants any premium to the group," Gieber wrote.

Centex, which reported a 30% increase in its quarterly earnings, reported order growth, but it was weaker than analysts expected.

The Dallas-based builder said its new orders rose 4% to 8,128 homes. Sales were strongest in the Southwest, where orders spiked 28% year over year. On the West Coast, orders rose 10%. But orders fell 15% in the Southeast, 8% in the mid-Atlantic and 3% in the Midwest.

"This is not particularly positive to hit only 4%, though we don't know all the details behind it," says Gieber, who was expecting nearly 11% order growth.

Centex said net income rose to $329.3 million, or $2.49 a share, for its fiscal third quarter ending Dec. 31, up from $253.8 million, or $1.91 a share, a year earlier. Excluding discontinued items, Centex posted earnings of $332.7 million, or $2.52 a share. Analysts expected earnings of $2.48 a share, according to Thomson First Call.

Revenue rose 25% to $3.74 billion, shy of analysts forecast of $3.81 billion.

Centex's earnings growth came amid an 18% increase in home closings, which rose to 9,504 units from 8,047, and a 130-basis-point jump in operating margin.

The weak orders will likely be a focus on both companies' conference calls Wednesday morning. Homebuilder Meritage (MTH:NYSE) will also report earnings today at an unspecified time.

The existing home sales data comes out at 10 a.m. EST from the National Association of Realtors.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary
Author Trouble on the Home Front Replies
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 9319
Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 8:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Federal Reserve unveils its $500 billion GSE mortgaged-backed securities buying program - revealing the four money managers that will be running the program as well as its target (next June) for finishing the purchases. This should dramatically lower conforming fixed mortgage rates across the yield curve spectrum:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601208&sid=a160y41WSJvk&refer=finance
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 11498
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Qualitative overview of housing here in So. Cal:

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-cover21-2008dec21,0,1066800.story
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 11498
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 12:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

More moving out of sunny southern CA than in...4yrs in a row:

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-leaving-california18-2008dec18,0,5838.story
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 9319
Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Treasury working on plans to bring mortgage rates down by as much as 100 bps, per the WSJ. Assuming a 30-year fixed rate mortgage, a decline from 5.5% to 4.5% should reduce one's monthly payments by about 12%, all else equal.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122833771718976731.html?mod=testMod

Quote:
The plan, which is in the development stages, would use mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to bring loan rates down as low as 4.5%, a full percentage point lower than the prevailing rates for 30-year fixed mortgages.

Government officials are under pressure to stem foreclosures, which underpin much of the current financial crisis. Treasury has struggled for months to come up with a plan that would ease the market without appearing to bail out homeowners and lenders.

Under the plan, Treasury would buy securities underpinning loans guaranteed by the two mortgage giants, which are temporarily under the control of the government, as well as those guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration. Fannie and Freddie guarantee a large proportion of all new home loans made in the U.S.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 9319
Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's the empirical evidence. The Feds buying another $500 billion of agency MBS at current levels would add a significant amount of liquidity to the US economy via another round of refinancing and lower mortgage rates across the board - the latter of which would also put a cushion under housing prices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mortgage applications surge by record amount
Wednesday December 3, 7:13 am ET

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Mortgage applications surged by the largest amount on record last week as a new Federal Reserve program pushed interest rates down to their lowest level in more than 3 years, data from an industry group showed on Wednesday.

The Mortgage Bankers Association said its seasonally adjusted index of mortgage applications, which includes both purchase and refinance loans, for the week ended November 28 soared a record 112.1 percent to 857.7, the highest reading since the week ended March 21 when it reached 965.9.

Potential borrowers were lured by enticing mortgage rates, which dropped dramatically after the Federal Reserve unveiled a plan last week to buy up to $500 billion of mortgage securities backed by government-sponsored enterprises, Fannie Mae (Pacific:FNM - News), Freddie Mac (Pacific:FRE - News), and Ginnie Mae. The program also entails buying up to $100 billion of debt issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks.

"Many borrowers missed an opportunity to take advantage when rates dropped sharply for a brief period when the GSEs were placed under conservatorship," Orawin Velz, Associate Vice President of Economic Forecasting, said in a statement.

"When rates plummeted following the Fed's announcement that it would buy GSE debt and MBS, many of those on the sidelines decided to quickly jump in and take advantage of lower rates before they began to rebound," she said.

Borrowing costs on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages, excluding fees, averaged 5.47 percent, down a whopping 0.52 percentage point from the previous week, the largest drop since 1990 when the MBA started conducting the weekly survey.

Interest rates are at their lowest level since the week ended June 24, 2005, when they reached the same level. Interest rates are sharply below the peak of 6.59 percent reached during the summer, but only slightly below the 2008 low of 5.49 percent in January, according to the trade group.

Interest rates were below year-ago levels of 5.82 percent.

The MBA's seasonally adjusted purchase index rose 38.0 percent to 361.1, the largest rise since the week ended February 24, 1995. The index, however, came in well below its year-ago level of 464.3, a drop of 22.2 percent.

Overall mortgage applications last week were 8.3 percent above their year-ago level. The four-week moving average of mortgage applications, which smooths the volatile weekly figures, was up 29.7 percent.

WEEKLY REFINANCING ACTIVITY SURGES

Cameron Findlay, chief economist at LendingTree.com based in Charlotte, North Carolina, said they are seeing a positive uptick in refinancing volume due to the drop in interest rates.

"Consumers who were previously on the fence to refinance or purchase a home are in a position to take advantage of the decline in rates," said on Tuesday.

"Now it'll be a matter of qualification as lenders evaluate each borrower individually," he said.

The low interest rates can help many drop their monthly payments, and is especially good news for those who have adjustable- rate mortgages and are looking to lock in a secure fixed-rate mortgage, he said.

The group's seasonally adjusted index of refinancing applications jumped 203.3 percent to 3,802.8, the largest rise on record. The index was up 37.7 percent from its year-ago level of 2,761.3.

The refinance share of applications increased to 69.1 percent from 49.3 percent the previous week. The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share of activity decreased to 1.4 percent, down from 3.0 percent the previous week.

Fixed 15-year mortgage rates averaged 5.13 percent, down from 5.78 percent the previous week. Rates on one-year ARMs decreased to 6.61 percent from 6.87 percent.

The U.S. housing market is currently suffering the worst downturn since the Great Depression. A huge supply of unsold homes, tighter lending standards and record foreclosures have pushed down home prices, deflating a bubble from the early part of this decade.

While U.S. housing market indexes tend to be volatile, data from the MBA may help gauge how the hard-hit sector is faring.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 11498
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 2:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From 6.28 to 5.5 on 30yr fixed in one day! My friend in the Mortgage biz phones did not stop ringing:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aQ86JoZr_VFY&refer=home
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 9319
Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree - this gives the best "bang for the buck" in terms of inducinig investors to invest not just in GSE-backed MBS, but also other assets aside from Treasuries, such as bank loans, bank debt, etc. This will also directly lower the cost of buying a new house. $500 billion (four times the size of the PIMCO Total Return Fund) should be sufficient to bring GSE MBS spreads back in, as this purchase represents about 10% of the entire agency MBS market:

http://www.sifma.org/research/pdf/AgencyMortgageOutstanding.pdf
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 11498
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 8:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Finally--straight into MBS
Quote:

For release at 8:15 a.m. EST

The Federal Reserve announced on Tuesday that it will initiate a program to purchase the direct obligations of housing-related government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs)–Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks–and mortgage-backed securities (MBS) backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae. Spreads of rates on GSE debt and on GSE-guaranteed mortgages have widened appreciably of late. This action is being taken to reduce the cost and increase the availability of credit for the purchase of houses, which in turn should support housing markets and foster improved conditions in financial markets more generally.


http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/mortgage_rates/blog/33819.aspx
Purchases of up to $100 billion in GSE direct obligations under the program will be conducted with the Federal Reserve’s primary dealers through a series of competitive auctions and will begin next week. Purchases of up to $500 billion in MBS will be conducted by asset managers selected via a competitive process with a goal of beginning these purchases before year-end. Purchases of both direct obligations and MBS are expected to take place over several quarters. Further information regarding the operational details of this program will be provided after consultation with market participants.

_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 11498
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 7:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rents showing effects of overbuilding....not just homes:

http://seekingalpha.com/article/105728-how-to-solve-the-excess-supply-in-housing?source=feed
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 11498
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Economists trying to discount a housing bottom based on inventory (all important vacant inventory), or spiking starts that are just coming to fruition are forgetting the number three rules of RE: location, location, location.

The boom vastly increased supply in marginal areas (excluding Las Vegas which could be said to be one of these in its entirety). Some of these are so far out (ie Baker in CA) that no bulldozers are necessary. They will just sit. And while livable structures succomb to the demographics of household creation (still 2X supply) this outside supply will stand as if it has never existed. And those were the subprime loans already well written off.

Quote:
Foreclosure of a dream

Published: November 13 2008 15:00 | Last updated: November 13 2008 22:41

Let us return to the root of the financial crisis, the US housing market. It is still rotting. Prices in the 20 cities covered by the Case-Schiller index have been falling for almost two years. Data from RealtyTrac released on Thursday shows that in the month of October alone, a quarter of a million US households received foreclosure filings. In Nevada, a state suffering from some of the worst fall-out from the housing boom, there has been one filing for every 11 homes so far this year. Estimates vary, but roughly a quarter of mortgaged homes in the US are worth less than the debt secured against them.

It is difficult to see any moderation of the trends in the coming months. Thanks to the excesses in subprime lending, the relationship between unemployment and repossession numbers broke down – mortgage delinquencies began rising while the economy was still in decent shape. However, the link is not broken. The October jump in foreclosures – up by a quarter year-on-year – reflects the latest rise in the unemployment rate to 6.5 per cent, from 5 per cent as recently as April. The economic consensus is for this to hit 7.8 per cent by the end of 2009.

What should policymakers do? The only approach that has so far appeared to slow the rise in subprime and Alt-A mortgage delinquency numbers has been the $100bn worth of Federal tax rebate cheques distributed over the summer. Giving borrowers greater notice before foreclosure, as California recently forced banks to do, merely delays the inevitable. Meanwhile, research by the Federal Reserve of St Louis suggests that modification of mortgages, while politically popular, provides only a short-term fix. Changing the rules of the game discourages future lending by the banks. Until an end to the recession is in sight, there is very little that can be done.

_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 11498
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 9:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So.....at long last: Citi et. al. are suspending foreclosures and setting mortgage payments at 38% income. This cudda/shudda/wudda been done for subprime a year-half ago. With govt. buying in structures and negotiating them out at cost and it'd be a differnet world right now. Rolling Eyes
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 11498
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nodoodahs wrote:
My opinion remains this is a financial speculation event far more than a broad economic event.


As abetted by the gov. hard-sell: "this sucker could go down," chopping down LEH without regard to the roots.

But we'll never know 'cause the two factors are not independent. Farmers already reining in their planting for lack of fertilizer funding--it doesn't get any more economic than that. But deeper than that, you'll never be able to say what's economic and what's not when the object of that speculation is the most hard of hard assets, the american house--and the most abstract, the american home. They call it a "dream" I think.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nodoodahs
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 2166

PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FWIW, I am still taking the "over" on hard economic numbers in the U.S. This includes housing, GDP, etc. My opinion remains this is a financial speculation event far more than a broad economic event.

Not that there's no bleedover ... just that mainstream perception of that bleedover is overestimated.
_________________
I haven’t seen a beatin’ like that since somebody stuck a banana in my pants and turned a monkey loose.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 9319
Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

New home sales surprise on the upside. Home Depot rallying in response:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aCnoEGB5FdDo&refer=home

Quote:
The median price of a new home decreased 9.1 percent from a year earlier to $218,400, the lowest since September 2004.

Sales were down 33 percent from September 2007, the Commerce report showed.

On a positive note, builders cut inventories at a record pace. The number of homes for sale fell to a seasonally adjusted 394,000, the fewest since June 2004. The 7.3 percent decline from August was the biggest since record keeping began in 1963.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 9319
Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Housing starts drops to its lowest level since January 1991. This should help clear out more "idle" inventory going forward:

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/96e3994e-9c4f-11dd-a42e-000077b07658.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Please log in to view without the ad banners
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14, 15, 16  Next
Page 4 of 16

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB