| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
cblanchb Newbie

Joined: 16 Jan 2008 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| How do you guys think IMB will do with this home crisis? They already laid off quite a few employees and recently their default ratings were reduced to junk. Think they will pull through or are they goners? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 6702 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Again, here's a bold stock...mortgage REIT:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=RWT&t=1y
Classic "retest" on lower low on much lighter volume...but do you really want to own this at July's levels? _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 6702 Location: Sunny California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7239 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The potential government solutions are now piling up - as we have suggested earlier:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120294935869166831.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news
| Quote: | The banking industry, struggling to contain the fallout from the mortgage debacle, is urgently shopping proposals to Congress and the Bush administration that could shift some of the risk for troubled loans to the federal government.
One proposal, advanced by officials at Credit Suisse Group, would expand the scope of loans guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration. The proposal would let the FHA guarantee mortgage refinancings by some delinquent borrowers.
Credit Suisse officials have met with senior officials from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which runs the FHA, and other policy makers to discuss the proposal.
The risk: If delinquent borrowers default on their refinanced loans, the federal government would have to absorb the loss.
The fact that the plan is receiving serious consideration suggests the level of concern in Washington as housing problems worsen and early efforts by the Bush administration fall short. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 6702 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Some ground-up solutions made possible by, you know what:
http://finance.yahoo.com/real-estate/article/104429/I'll-Buy-Your-House-If-You-Buy-Mine;_ylt=AvYNdFFPU.8BeLJnkVQmXOlO7sMF
10 percent price not a problem with 12 percent out of the realtors hide. _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 6702 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Valuing" CA res RE:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120276871472760255.html?mod=djemTEW
I suspect the selloff won't be as far as he's looking: two-income, immigrant co-habs and chinese wealth influx, the rise of the international local SD, LA, SF (and concomitant dollar discount). _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 6702 Location: Sunny California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mtvk Veteran Poster

Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Posts: 170
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why should govt absorb the loss? It looks like Chavez country.
Its like taking someones money (debt) and giving to someone else
without any constitutional basis.
"govt" indirectly here is all tax payers.
In the name of govt, all things done are making this a pseudo-socialistic/dictatorship country.
Its sad in this dreamers country, people vote for promises of liars and not
see the truth of Ron Paul.
Here is an article on ultimate sell signal on US:
http://tinyurl.com/256ypx |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 6702 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spurt of refis last month fading fast:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/23366843 _________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nodoodahs Moderator


Joined: 06 May 2005 Posts: 1734 Location: TX
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
The OFHEO Home Price Report (PDF) shows their all-transactions House Price Index (HPI) rose 0.1 percent over the latest quarter and 0.8 percent over the latest year. Of the 291 cities on OFHEO’s list of "ranked" MSAs, 192 had positive four-quarter appreciation and 99 had price declines. Of the 20 ranked cities with the greatest price declines over the latest four quarters, all but two were in California or Florida (Nevada and Michigan accounted for the remainder). 40 of the 51 "states" (they include D.C.) showed appreciation, and while 11 showed losses in value, there were nine that showed average annual gains of 5% or more, year over year.
http://www.ofheo.gov/media/hpi/4q07hpi.pdf
See also:
http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2007/08/home-price-appreciation-and-its-measurement/
http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2007/08/compare-and-constrast-on-home-price-appreciation-indices/
http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2007/08/calculating-the-home-price-impact/
The differences between OFHEO HPI and S&P C-S HPI are important; neither is perfect, but I would lean towards the OFHEO version as more indicative of overall economic impact.
While the OFHEO is "higher" now than the C-S index is, there have been (and will be in the future) times when that relationship is reversed. _________________ He was wearing my Harvard tie. Can you believe it? My Harvard tie. Like oh, sure, HE went to Harvard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7239 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bill, thanks, that is a great update.
Note that for folks looking at investing in either Fannie or Freddie, the OFHEO HPI and the other OFHEO sub-indices are the ones to watch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anti Junior Poster

Joined: 07 Jun 2007 Posts: 28
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very interesting update Bill.
I didn't go thru the OFHEO data, But may be you could answer a question
regarding Fannie/Freedie transactions used.....
Do they diferentiate between purchase and refi tranctions ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nodoodahs Moderator


Joined: 06 May 2005 Posts: 1734 Location: TX
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
OFHEO publishes both indices separately, sales only and including refis. The all-transactions includes refis.
Check the link (PDF) for the sales only data, it's in the summary at the beginning of the doc. _________________ He was wearing my Harvard tie. Can you believe it? My Harvard tie. Like oh, sure, HE went to Harvard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenryTo Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 7239 Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rffrydr Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 6702 Location: Sunny California
|
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've been harping on the need for the Fed to start taking in ABS, mortgages specifically, in the manner of the (much criticized) ECB. The Madman is thinking similarly. Thornberg breaking january lows bodes ill so says he:
| Quote: |
Back on crisis watch, not where we want to be. That's how I feel after Thornburg's (TMA - commentary - Cramer's Take) near collapse. TMA is the first financial of consequence to take out its January low when the Fed felt the need to come in and act swiftly.
The bankruptcy of TMA is a frightening prospect. I don't think it will happen. They have assets; they will sell them and meet those margin calls. But the common may not be worth more than it is now, like when Countrywide Financial (CFC - commentary - Cramer's Take) was at $5-$6.
The more important concern is that TMA is the best of the best and if the best of the best could be rumored to go under -- and that by a major investment bank writing about it -- what does it say about the middling lenders, the Washington Mutuals and the Countrywides? The latter is backstopped by BAC but the former looks like it is headed to its $10 January low.
The other two that are floundering around their 52 week lows are Fannie Mae and Freddie. I have no idea how to value these two -- they are public companies that are being told to take one for the team, and that shouldn't be their role. It should be the role of the FHA, which has the full faith and credit of the Feds sticking behind it and can be a guarantor of refinanced mortgages, if the Fed would cut rates low enough.
In other words, someone has to take a beating. It shouldn't be FNM, it should be FHA!
In either case, the TMA action is telling the Fed that there is no money from banks to give to responsible non-bank originators.
It's another wake-up call in the endless series of wake-up calls that the Fed has to start taking in AAA mortgages in order to help stem this crisis. |
_________________ Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Please log in to view without the ad banners |
 |
|