MarketThoughts.com Home Page
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  StatisticsStatistics   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

What is Up with Natural Gas?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 19, 20, 21  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author What is Up with Natural Gas?
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11743
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 11:00 am    Post subject: What is Up with Natural Gas? Reply with quote

Since our December 17th commentary was published ("What is Up with Natural Gas?"), natural gas prices (basis the January 2007 contract) are already down by more than $1/MMBtu.

The contract is way oversold but a solid bottom is still nowhere in sight. For now, I prefer to sit and wait on the sidelines before buying anything natural-gas related (regulated pipelines notwithstanding). Watch out for Canadian producers especially since I believe the Canadian dollar is still way overvalued.

Best,

Henry

[/img]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary
Author What is Up with Natural Gas? Replies
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11743
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Natural gas sentiment as bearish as it gets but I have to agree the short-term fundamentals are still pretty bearish. Would not be purchasing UNG anytime soon.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-24/natural-gas-puts-rise-to-most-expensive-level-since-09-amid-glut-options.html?cmpid=yhoo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11743
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

UNG down nearly 3% today on a benign EIA natural gas storage report.

Quote:
Working gas in storage was 2,595 Bcf as of Friday, February 17, 2012, according to EIA estimates. This represents a net decline of 166 Bcf from the previous week. Stocks were 753 Bcf higher than last year at this time and 744 Bcf above the 5-year average of 1,851 Bcf. In the East Region, stocks were 300 Bcf above the 5-year average following net withdrawals of 97 Bcf. Stocks in the Producing Region were 343 Bcf above the 5-year average of 650 Bcf after a net withdrawal of 58 Bcf. Stocks in the West Region were 102 Bcf above the 5-year average after a net drawdown of 11 Bcf. At 2,595 Bcf, total working gas is above the 5-year historical range.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11743
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

State of the natural gas hedge fund industry.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exclusive: As natural gas wild ways return, funds fail to thrive

(Reuters) - For the dozen or so niche hedge funds that make their money in the natural gas market, January's wild trading should have come as a welcome relief.

After three years of calmer, range-bound activity, gas prices fell into a dramatic tailspin and volatility spiked, providing the kind of directional movement and intra-day swings amid which such funds typically thrive.
Memories of the mid-2000s, when fortunes were made and lost in days, returned.

But with only a few exceptions, the month was a wash for these billion-dollar funds, with managers in Houston and Connecticut failing to capitalize on the 16 percent slump in prices to a 10-year low amid tepid winter weather and an unyielding glut of shale gas.

According to a Reuters analysis of performance data provided by industry sources, the gap is widening between a handful of big winners and those who are trying to regain momentum after 2011, the worst year in over a decade for many commodity managers.

"When hedge funds see a lot of volatility in natural gas, they hop in to get a piece of the action," said Kiplin Perkins, market data analyst at Parity Energy, an online platform for energy options trading.

Natural gas has historically been more volatile than many energy commodities as it a smaller, U.S.-confined market compared to a global play like crude oil. Unlike oil or gold, where big macro-funds are active players, natural gas has tended to attract only a handful of specialized fund managers, with a total of about $12 billion or of capital, according to data on the capital holdings of the funds involved.

Last year, gas was also one of the worst performing commodities, with prices falling more than a third while a few top funds in the business posted some of the largest gains across the hedge fund universe.

That decline accelerated in January, when traders also saw a return to the kind of gyrations that were common in the years prior to 2008, when the financial crisis and rise of shale gas production cast a pall on the market.
Prices rose or fell by more than 8 percent on five days in January, more times than in all of 2011. Implied volatility -- a measure of options pricing -- doubled to more than 60 percent, the highest in three years.

The roller-coaster ride has greased the profit wheels of a few acclaimed hedge fund managers in gas, including David Coolidge of Velite Capital and Todd Esse of Sasco Energy.

Houston-based Velite stood out last year for its persistently bearish bet against gas, notching a 51 percent return. The streak continued in January, with the $1.4 billion fund gaining 14 percent, one industry source said. It has averaged a 12 percent gain for each of the past three months.
Sasco, founded by former senior Sempra Energy trader Esse in 2008, gained more than 5 percent on average over the last three months, including a nearly 8 percent rise in January, according to an investor in the Westport, Connecticut-based fund, which manages nearly $500 million.
While little is known of the exact trades put on by these funds as the swings accelerated in January, analysts believe a creative mix of futures and options were deployed to profit from prices that sunk to 2002 lows before rebounding 14 percent at one point.

And while the majority were naturally short on prices given the oversupplied physical gas market, a few admitted going long when technical charts indicated an oversold market.

Returns for the sector's most famous member -- Enron legend John Arnold's Centaurus fund -- were not immediately available. The $4 billion fund returned about 9 percent last year.

Representatives at the funds named this story, including Velite and Sasco, declined to comment on their performance or strategy.

A DOWN MONTH

Other gas-focused funds had modest -- even negative -- returns for November through January, data gathered by Reuters showed, showing that most struggled to turn the market's ups and downs to their advantage.

AAA Capital, a $1.4 billion fundamentally oriented fund group founded 15 years ago by Houston veteran Anthony Annunziato, ended the month almost unchanged after a 4 percent gain in December, the source said.

Whiteside Energy, also located in Houston and managed by former Citadel energy trader Carey Metz, fell more than 4 percent over the three months, the sources said. Its January loss was more than 6 percent.

The average energy hedge fund rose 2.4 percent in January, although monthly gain since November averaged only about 0.4 percent, according to New York-based industry database investment Alliance.

Analysts said one of the more successful trades in gas since November could have been the use of "straddles", considered the most aggressive play on volatility.

The strategy involves buying put and call options on gas at the same strike price. If prices move sharply in either direction, one side of the trade reaps gains and the other loses. The maximum loss is the premium paid for the options, while the potential for profit is unlimited.

Some funds used more plain strategies: going short when they suspected prices were too high and long when they believed the selling was overdone.

"We were short outright," said a trader at one of the better performing gas funds, speaking on condition of anonymity. "Sometimes we were structurally short, meaning we were short on the price curves we thought were overvalued and long on those we thought were undervalued."

"I think the rest probably traded more options than we did. They may have had options strategies pinned on the market being somewhat quiet and they may have sold off on volatility and lost money there."

GAS MARKET GOES FROM CALM TO VIOLENT

Natural gas spent much of last year trading in a fairly stable range of between $4 and $4.50 per mmBtu. Prices were essentially capped by record supplies of gas tapped from a relatively new and abundant source: shale.

With few traders anticipating a price swing amid the glut, implied volatility held relatively steady at between 35 and 40 percent through the third quarter. In January, it reached about 65 percent -- its highest in nearly three years.

"When you see volatility over 50 percent, it indicates there is not a lot of certainty about prices," said Frank Hayden, principal at Risk & Decision LLC, a risk management consulting firm in Houston.

While futures activity in gas was tame during most of last year, the market for options - which basically provide investors an insurance against sudden, adverse moves -- was even weaker.

"Options are protection. When prices are stable, people don't want to pay for protection," said a U.S. East Coast trader in gas options.

The first signs of a price breakdown came in late summer and early autumn, when oversupply drove gas firmly below the $4 support.

"When winter didn't materialize, the fundamentals did not support a $4 price. Then the question became: 'How low can gas go?'" the East Coast trader said. "Suddenly, people were buying puts for protection."

Prices continued to erode into winter, falling below $2.50 in January to a 10-year low of $2.23, as unseasonably warm weather slowed demand for heating and left a huge surplus in gas supplies.

Gas futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange slid 24 percent during eight sessions in January, their steepest eight-day drop in six years. A week later, the market bounced 14 percent, after several gas producers said they would trim production in response to low prices.

"There were surely some traders that got crushed at the $2.50 level," said Parity Energy's Perkins. "When they tried to cover their shorts, the got squeezed and volatility got pushed even higher."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11743
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interior Department to unveil rules on fracking.

http://www.garp.org/risk-news-and-resources/risk-headlines/story.aspx?newsid=42390
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11743
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 5:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UNG plans 1-for-4 reverse split.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-02/natural-gas-fund-plans-reverse-split-with-price-near-record-low.html?cmpid=yhoo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16939
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Navistar, in face of direct demand, at long last makes a commitment to natgas fleet (largely thanks to the EPA guidelines)....rolling off line in six months.

Think of this fleet-to-be more like a train than truck however....dedicated to follow the "track" of pumps.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16939
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Obama choosing to showcase UPS's "blue highway" natgas hub in his stop in Las Vegas today.

Local "pump" prices at still high at about $2/"gallon" with 30% inefficiency premium.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16939
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 9:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The "homefield advantange" combined with the liquid gas premium working behind the scenes:

Quote:
Let's look today at two energy companies making some very interesting news -- Apache (APA) and Chesapeake (CHK). Are either or both of these worthy of buying right now?

Apache has spent $2.85 billion to buy the privately owned Cordillera Energy, doubling its exposure in the Anadarko basin. This is another in a long list of majors buying more and more domestic natural gas shale assets in the past three years. But for Apache, this acquisition is different in two important ways.

First, by increasing its exposure into Oklahoma and Texas, Apache is in effect diluting its exposure to Egypt, a connection that cost shareholders dearly in 2011 during the conflict of the Arab Spring. While that exposure even before this acquisition was a very manageable 17%, management at Apache must still believe that transfer into domestic assets is a more reliable move over the long term. It's hard to argue with that.

Second, plays in the Anadarko basin shale are relatively more productive for natural gas liquids than for the more traditional "dry" gas that is represented by the $2.40 price on the Nymex. These "wet" products -- such as butane, hexane and heptane -- are still at very strong prices in open markets and represent great production margins, enough to keep some exploration & production companies working in fields even with battered "dry" gas pricing in place.

But the bottom line on Apache is that this deal shouldn't matter much; the purchase was at a reasonable premium, in areas Apache is already well established. Still, I have long believed Apache shares are wildly undervalued. We'll see whether this deal provides a catalyst to further interest and upside.


http://realmoney.thestreet.com/articles/01/23/2012/big-news-energy
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11743
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Morningstar on CHK's cutting production.

Quote:
Chesapeake Energy CHK on Monday announced plans to significantly cut its dry gas drilling rig count in 2012 in response to record-low natural gas prices and a dry gas hedge book that leaves the firm exposed to the lowest price levels in the past 10 years. Chesapeake intends to immediately curtail 500 million cubic feet of equivalent per day of gross operated production and could double this amount if low gas prices continue. The firm will lay down rigs in the Haynesville, Barnett, and Marcellus shales and will look to defer completions and pipeline connections wherever possible. We had been projecting Chesapeake's net gas production to increase 1% in 2012, to 2.721 bcfe/d. We estimate the company's revised operating plan will probably lead to a dry gas production decline of close to 300 mmcfe/d, or 10% year over year. Assuming an approximate 60% combined working interest across the Haynesville, Barnett, and Marcellus, this implies a gross reduction of 500 mmcfe/d, or less than 1% of U.S. natural gas supply. Accordingly, while we applaud Chesapeake's move to preserve shareholder value, we believe it will take more than a modest reduction in supply to solve the gas glut that exists in the United States. Chesapeake also disclosed plans to spend $1.4 billion (net of joint venture reimbursements) on undeveloped leasehold in 2012, all targeting liquids-rich acreage in plays in which the company is already active. Accordingly, look for more joint venture activity in the quarters ahead. Our fair value estimate remains unchanged at $32 per share.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16939
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 9:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chesapeake slashing production.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16939
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Manhattan, the last holdout, takes the pain:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/22/business/heating-oil-costs-surge-and-many-in-northeast-cant-switch.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&hp

Quote:
“As a consumer, I’m very frustrated,” said Nancy T. Schmitt, an energy-sector investment adviser whose Upper East Side co-op burns the densest form of oil. Her complex of about 50 units is weighing whether to switch to natural gas or to a lighter fuel to meet the new rules. “I’m paying a high price for a dirty fuel, and I’ve got a cleaner fuel available and I want to see it happen,” said Ms. Schmitt, who was trained as an environmental engineer.

But by one estimate, she said, it would cost $2 million to connect her complex to the existing lines. Con Ed has been working to help organize buildings into clusters for conversion, to lower costs and diminish the inconvenience.


Really this is a question of infrastructure--and how much it really costs.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11743
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

February gas plunges 5% to just $2.34. UNG down a similar percentage to $5.10 a share. To think I actually had bought some of this a few years ago at >$40 a share (pre reverse 1-for-2 split!).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 16939
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 7:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's all in the lease contracts....yet again american socialism, the "property law," gets in the way. Now cheaper than coal in many places! That's a social good comminism could never have delivered.

First signs of winter last week and new steel plants (making fracking piping of course!) may be snake zeroing in on its tail!
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11743
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How low can this go? February gas nears $2.50/MMBtu. Folks now calling this a "catastrophic surplus."

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-16/gas-speculators-turning-bearish-on-catastrophic-surplus-energy-markets.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 11743
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A battle of shale gas in Europe.

http://the-american-interest.com/article-bd.cfm?piece=1168
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Please log in to view without the ad banners
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 19, 20, 21  Next
Page 3 of 21

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB